Cargando…
Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials are considered exogenous potentials, that is, the responses obtained are highly dependent upon the characteristic of the stimulus used to evoke them. AIM: To investigate the influence of the click stimulus polarity in the study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiom...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19082355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5 |
_version_ | 1784783531429330944 |
---|---|
author | de Lima, Janaina Patricio de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia Foelkel, Tábata Pierini Monteiro, Camila Zotelli Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio |
author_facet | de Lima, Janaina Patricio de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia Foelkel, Tábata Pierini Monteiro, Camila Zotelli Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio |
author_sort | de Lima, Janaina Patricio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials are considered exogenous potentials, that is, the responses obtained are highly dependent upon the characteristic of the stimulus used to evoke them. AIM: To investigate the influence of the click stimulus polarity in the study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) at different intensities, using insertion-canal earphones. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 33 individuals, aged between 18 and 28, with no auditory alteration were submitted to BERA testing, with click stimulus on the rarefaction, condensation and alternate polarities, in different intensities. RESULTS: The absolute latencies of the V wave proved to be lower in the rarefaction polarity when compared to the others and, at 80 dBnHL, there was a significant difference between rarefaction and the other polarities for interpeak latencies III-V and I-V. There was a high correlation between the condensation and alternating polarities for absolute and interpeak latencies at 80 dBnHL. CONCLUSION: the click stimulus polarity has a significant influence on BERA. In the routine use of the TDH 39 earphone, with alternating polarity, we suggest that condensation polarity is more adequate for standardized comparison purposes, due to the higher similarity of the latencies found in this insertion earphone study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9445932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94459322022-09-09 Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials de Lima, Janaina Patricio de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia Foelkel, Tábata Pierini Monteiro, Camila Zotelli Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials are considered exogenous potentials, that is, the responses obtained are highly dependent upon the characteristic of the stimulus used to evoke them. AIM: To investigate the influence of the click stimulus polarity in the study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) at different intensities, using insertion-canal earphones. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 33 individuals, aged between 18 and 28, with no auditory alteration were submitted to BERA testing, with click stimulus on the rarefaction, condensation and alternate polarities, in different intensities. RESULTS: The absolute latencies of the V wave proved to be lower in the rarefaction polarity when compared to the others and, at 80 dBnHL, there was a significant difference between rarefaction and the other polarities for interpeak latencies III-V and I-V. There was a high correlation between the condensation and alternating polarities for absolute and interpeak latencies at 80 dBnHL. CONCLUSION: the click stimulus polarity has a significant influence on BERA. In the routine use of the TDH 39 earphone, with alternating polarity, we suggest that condensation polarity is more adequate for standardized comparison purposes, due to the higher similarity of the latencies found in this insertion earphone study. Elsevier 2015-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9445932/ /pubmed/19082355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article de Lima, Janaina Patricio de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia Foelkel, Tábata Pierini Monteiro, Camila Zotelli Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
title | Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
title_full | Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
title_fullStr | Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
title_full_unstemmed | Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
title_short | Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
title_sort | polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19082355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delimajanainapatricio polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials AT defreitasalvarengakatia polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials AT foelkeltabatapierini polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials AT monteirocamilazotelli polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials AT agostinhoraquelsampaio polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials |