Cargando…

Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials

Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials are considered exogenous potentials, that is, the responses obtained are highly dependent upon the characteristic of the stimulus used to evoke them. AIM: To investigate the influence of the click stimulus polarity in the study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Lima, Janaina Patricio, de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia, Foelkel, Tábata Pierini, Monteiro, Camila Zotelli, Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19082355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5
_version_ 1784783531429330944
author de Lima, Janaina Patricio
de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia
Foelkel, Tábata Pierini
Monteiro, Camila Zotelli
Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio
author_facet de Lima, Janaina Patricio
de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia
Foelkel, Tábata Pierini
Monteiro, Camila Zotelli
Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio
author_sort de Lima, Janaina Patricio
collection PubMed
description Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials are considered exogenous potentials, that is, the responses obtained are highly dependent upon the characteristic of the stimulus used to evoke them. AIM: To investigate the influence of the click stimulus polarity in the study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) at different intensities, using insertion-canal earphones. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 33 individuals, aged between 18 and 28, with no auditory alteration were submitted to BERA testing, with click stimulus on the rarefaction, condensation and alternate polarities, in different intensities. RESULTS: The absolute latencies of the V wave proved to be lower in the rarefaction polarity when compared to the others and, at 80 dBnHL, there was a significant difference between rarefaction and the other polarities for interpeak latencies III-V and I-V. There was a high correlation between the condensation and alternating polarities for absolute and interpeak latencies at 80 dBnHL. CONCLUSION: the click stimulus polarity has a significant influence on BERA. In the routine use of the TDH 39 earphone, with alternating polarity, we suggest that condensation polarity is more adequate for standardized comparison purposes, due to the higher similarity of the latencies found in this insertion earphone study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94459322022-09-09 Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials de Lima, Janaina Patricio de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia Foelkel, Tábata Pierini Monteiro, Camila Zotelli Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials are considered exogenous potentials, that is, the responses obtained are highly dependent upon the characteristic of the stimulus used to evoke them. AIM: To investigate the influence of the click stimulus polarity in the study of Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) at different intensities, using insertion-canal earphones. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 33 individuals, aged between 18 and 28, with no auditory alteration were submitted to BERA testing, with click stimulus on the rarefaction, condensation and alternate polarities, in different intensities. RESULTS: The absolute latencies of the V wave proved to be lower in the rarefaction polarity when compared to the others and, at 80 dBnHL, there was a significant difference between rarefaction and the other polarities for interpeak latencies III-V and I-V. There was a high correlation between the condensation and alternating polarities for absolute and interpeak latencies at 80 dBnHL. CONCLUSION: the click stimulus polarity has a significant influence on BERA. In the routine use of the TDH 39 earphone, with alternating polarity, we suggest that condensation polarity is more adequate for standardized comparison purposes, due to the higher similarity of the latencies found in this insertion earphone study. Elsevier 2015-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9445932/ /pubmed/19082355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
de Lima, Janaina Patricio
de Freitas Alvarenga, Kátia
Foelkel, Tábata Pierini
Monteiro, Camila Zotelli
Agostinho, Raquel Sampaio
Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
title Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
title_full Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
title_fullStr Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
title_full_unstemmed Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
title_short Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
title_sort polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19082355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5
work_keys_str_mv AT delimajanainapatricio polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials
AT defreitasalvarengakatia polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials
AT foelkeltabatapierini polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials
AT monteirocamilazotelli polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials
AT agostinhoraquelsampaio polaritystimulationeffectsonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentials