Cargando…
Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009 |
_version_ | 1784783546482688000 |
---|---|
author | Ertogrul, Rodi Sahin, Koray Celik, Haluk Kapicioglu, Mehmet Ersen, Ali Bilsel, Kerem |
author_facet | Ertogrul, Rodi Sahin, Koray Celik, Haluk Kapicioglu, Mehmet Ersen, Ali Bilsel, Kerem |
author_sort | Ertogrul, Rodi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05). CONCLUSION: HO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9445996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94459962022-09-07 Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? Ertogrul, Rodi Sahin, Koray Celik, Haluk Kapicioglu, Mehmet Ersen, Ali Bilsel, Kerem JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05). CONCLUSION: HO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes. Elsevier 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9445996/ /pubmed/36081692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Shoulder Ertogrul, Rodi Sahin, Koray Celik, Haluk Kapicioglu, Mehmet Ersen, Ali Bilsel, Kerem Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
title | Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
title_full | Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
title_fullStr | Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
title_short | Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
title_sort | is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? |
topic | Shoulder |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ertogrulrodi iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury AT sahinkoray iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury AT celikhaluk iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury AT kapicioglumehmet iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury AT ersenali iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury AT bilselkerem iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury |