Cargando…

Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ertogrul, Rodi, Sahin, Koray, Celik, Haluk, Kapicioglu, Mehmet, Ersen, Ali, Bilsel, Kerem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009
_version_ 1784783546482688000
author Ertogrul, Rodi
Sahin, Koray
Celik, Haluk
Kapicioglu, Mehmet
Ersen, Ali
Bilsel, Kerem
author_facet Ertogrul, Rodi
Sahin, Koray
Celik, Haluk
Kapicioglu, Mehmet
Ersen, Ali
Bilsel, Kerem
author_sort Ertogrul, Rodi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05). CONCLUSION: HO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9445996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94459962022-09-07 Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury? Ertogrul, Rodi Sahin, Koray Celik, Haluk Kapicioglu, Mehmet Ersen, Ali Bilsel, Kerem JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis. METHODS: Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05). CONCLUSION: HO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes. Elsevier 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9445996/ /pubmed/36081692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Ertogrul, Rodi
Sahin, Koray
Celik, Haluk
Kapicioglu, Mehmet
Ersen, Ali
Bilsel, Kerem
Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
title Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
title_full Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
title_fullStr Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
title_full_unstemmed Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
title_short Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
title_sort is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9445996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.04.009
work_keys_str_mv AT ertogrulrodi iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury
AT sahinkoray iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury
AT celikhaluk iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury
AT kapicioglumehmet iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury
AT ersenali iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury
AT bilselkerem iscoracoclavicularossificationacomplicationoragoodprognosticfactoraftersurgicaltreatmentofacromioclavicularjointinjury