Cargando…

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values

Hearing loss in the elderly is one of the most incapacitating communication disorders, preventing them to fully perform their tasks in society. AIM: This study aimed to determine what is the best tool that together with the audiometric tests better represents the hearing loss reported by the elderly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Freitas Kasper Calviti, Karin Christine, Desgualdo Pereira, Liliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20209277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30539-5
_version_ 1784783572295483392
author de Freitas Kasper Calviti, Karin Christine
Desgualdo Pereira, Liliane
author_facet de Freitas Kasper Calviti, Karin Christine
Desgualdo Pereira, Liliane
author_sort de Freitas Kasper Calviti, Karin Christine
collection PubMed
description Hearing loss in the elderly is one of the most incapacitating communication disorders, preventing them to fully perform their tasks in society. AIM: This study aimed to determine what is the best tool that together with the audiometric tests better represents the hearing loss reported by the elderly and which frequencies in the audiometric test must be considered to determine the hearing loss degree. STUDY: Clinical prospective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 elderly with ages between 60 and 82 years old were assessed. The subjects were submitted to a conventional audiometric assessment and a Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) questionnaire. Three audiometric averages were analyzed and compared with the results obtained in the complete form (HHIE) and in its reduced form (HHIE-S). RESULTS: specificity showed values between 43.5% and 58.5% for HHIE with the different audiometric averages and values between 50% and 63.4% for the HHIE-S. CONCLUSION: audiometric average pure tone thresholds in the frequencies of 4kHz and 6kHz found in the audiometric assessment did not contribute to the self-reported hearing handicap perception. The correlation between HHIE-S and PTA1 had the best specificity (63.4%) and best positive predictive value (62.5%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446100
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94461002022-09-09 Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values de Freitas Kasper Calviti, Karin Christine Desgualdo Pereira, Liliane Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article Hearing loss in the elderly is one of the most incapacitating communication disorders, preventing them to fully perform their tasks in society. AIM: This study aimed to determine what is the best tool that together with the audiometric tests better represents the hearing loss reported by the elderly and which frequencies in the audiometric test must be considered to determine the hearing loss degree. STUDY: Clinical prospective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 71 elderly with ages between 60 and 82 years old were assessed. The subjects were submitted to a conventional audiometric assessment and a Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) questionnaire. Three audiometric averages were analyzed and compared with the results obtained in the complete form (HHIE) and in its reduced form (HHIE-S). RESULTS: specificity showed values between 43.5% and 58.5% for HHIE with the different audiometric averages and values between 50% and 63.4% for the HHIE-S. CONCLUSION: audiometric average pure tone thresholds in the frequencies of 4kHz and 6kHz found in the audiometric assessment did not contribute to the self-reported hearing handicap perception. The correlation between HHIE-S and PTA1 had the best specificity (63.4%) and best positive predictive value (62.5%). Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9446100/ /pubmed/20209277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30539-5 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
de Freitas Kasper Calviti, Karin Christine
Desgualdo Pereira, Liliane
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
title Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
title_full Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
title_fullStr Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
title_short Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
title_sort sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446100/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20209277
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30539-5
work_keys_str_mv AT defreitaskaspercalvitikarinchristine sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofhearinglosstodifferentaudiometricmeanvalues
AT desgualdopereiraliliane sensitivityspecificityandpredictivevaluesofhearinglosstodifferentaudiometricmeanvalues