Cargando…

Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI+) on image quality and diagnostic evaluation in abdominal dual-energy CT scans with impaired portal-venous contrast. METHODS: We screened 11,746 patients who underwent portal-venous abdominal dual-energy CT for ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahmoudi, Scherwin, Lange, Marvin, Lenga, Lukas, Yel, Ibrahim, Koch, Vitali, Booz, Christian, Martin, Simon, Bernatz, Simon, Vogl, Thomas, Albrecht, Moritz, Scholtz, Jan-Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20220006
_version_ 1784783586572894208
author Mahmoudi, Scherwin
Lange, Marvin
Lenga, Lukas
Yel, Ibrahim
Koch, Vitali
Booz, Christian
Martin, Simon
Bernatz, Simon
Vogl, Thomas
Albrecht, Moritz
Scholtz, Jan-Erik
author_facet Mahmoudi, Scherwin
Lange, Marvin
Lenga, Lukas
Yel, Ibrahim
Koch, Vitali
Booz, Christian
Martin, Simon
Bernatz, Simon
Vogl, Thomas
Albrecht, Moritz
Scholtz, Jan-Erik
author_sort Mahmoudi, Scherwin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI+) on image quality and diagnostic evaluation in abdominal dual-energy CT scans with impaired portal-venous contrast. METHODS: We screened 11,746 patients who underwent portal-venous abdominal dual-energy CT for cancer staging between 08/2014 and 11/2019 and identified those with poor portal-venous contrast. Standard linearly-blended image series and VMI+ image series at 40, 50, and 60 keV were reconstructed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of abdominal organs and vascular structures were calculated. Image noise, image contrast and overall image quality were rated by three radiologists using 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: 452 of 11,746 (4%) exams were poorly opacified. We excluded 190 cases due to incomplete datasets or multiple exams of the same patient with a final study group of 262. Highest CNR values in all abdominal organs (liver, 6.4 ± 3.0; kidney, 17.4 ± 7.5; spleen, 8.0 ± 3.5) and vascular structures (aorta, 16.0 ± 7.3; intrahepatic vein, 11.3 ± 4.7; portal vein, 15.5 ± 6.7) were measured at 40 keV VMI+ with significantly superior values compared to all other series. In subjective analysis, highest image contrast was seen at 40 keV VMI+ (4.8 ± 0.4), whereas overall image quality peaked at 50 keV VMI+ (4.2 ± 0.5) with significantly superior results compared to all other series (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Image reconstruction using VMI+ algorithm at 50 keV significantly improves image contrast and image quality of originally poorly opacified abdominal CT scans and reduces the number of non-diagnostic scans. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We validated the impact of VMI+ reconstructions in poorly attenuated DECT studies of the abdomen in a big data cohort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94461562022-09-13 Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction Mahmoudi, Scherwin Lange, Marvin Lenga, Lukas Yel, Ibrahim Koch, Vitali Booz, Christian Martin, Simon Bernatz, Simon Vogl, Thomas Albrecht, Moritz Scholtz, Jan-Erik BJR Open Original Research OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI+) on image quality and diagnostic evaluation in abdominal dual-energy CT scans with impaired portal-venous contrast. METHODS: We screened 11,746 patients who underwent portal-venous abdominal dual-energy CT for cancer staging between 08/2014 and 11/2019 and identified those with poor portal-venous contrast. Standard linearly-blended image series and VMI+ image series at 40, 50, and 60 keV were reconstructed. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of abdominal organs and vascular structures were calculated. Image noise, image contrast and overall image quality were rated by three radiologists using 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: 452 of 11,746 (4%) exams were poorly opacified. We excluded 190 cases due to incomplete datasets or multiple exams of the same patient with a final study group of 262. Highest CNR values in all abdominal organs (liver, 6.4 ± 3.0; kidney, 17.4 ± 7.5; spleen, 8.0 ± 3.5) and vascular structures (aorta, 16.0 ± 7.3; intrahepatic vein, 11.3 ± 4.7; portal vein, 15.5 ± 6.7) were measured at 40 keV VMI+ with significantly superior values compared to all other series. In subjective analysis, highest image contrast was seen at 40 keV VMI+ (4.8 ± 0.4), whereas overall image quality peaked at 50 keV VMI+ (4.2 ± 0.5) with significantly superior results compared to all other series (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Image reconstruction using VMI+ algorithm at 50 keV significantly improves image contrast and image quality of originally poorly opacified abdominal CT scans and reduces the number of non-diagnostic scans. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: We validated the impact of VMI+ reconstructions in poorly attenuated DECT studies of the abdomen in a big data cohort. The British Institute of Radiology. 2022-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9446156/ /pubmed/36105416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20220006 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mahmoudi, Scherwin
Lange, Marvin
Lenga, Lukas
Yel, Ibrahim
Koch, Vitali
Booz, Christian
Martin, Simon
Bernatz, Simon
Vogl, Thomas
Albrecht, Moritz
Scholtz, Jan-Erik
Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
title Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
title_full Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
title_fullStr Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
title_short Salvaging low contrast abdominal CT studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
title_sort salvaging low contrast abdominal ct studies using noise-optimised virtual monoenergetic image reconstruction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20220006
work_keys_str_mv AT mahmoudischerwin salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT langemarvin salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT lengalukas salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT yelibrahim salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT kochvitali salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT boozchristian salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT martinsimon salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT bernatzsimon salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT voglthomas salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT albrechtmoritz salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction
AT scholtzjanerik salvaginglowcontrastabdominalctstudiesusingnoiseoptimisedvirtualmonoenergeticimagereconstruction