Cargando…

Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder

BACKGROUND: Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in patients with frozen shoulder (FS). However, the necessity of MRI and its diagnostic value is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to clarify whether routine MRI could identify additional shoulder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dimitriou, Dimitris, Winkler, Elin, Zindel, Christoph, Grubhofer, Florian, Wieser, Karl, Bouaicha, Samy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009
_version_ 1784783596190433280
author Dimitriou, Dimitris
Winkler, Elin
Zindel, Christoph
Grubhofer, Florian
Wieser, Karl
Bouaicha, Samy
author_facet Dimitriou, Dimitris
Winkler, Elin
Zindel, Christoph
Grubhofer, Florian
Wieser, Karl
Bouaicha, Samy
author_sort Dimitriou, Dimitris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in patients with frozen shoulder (FS). However, the necessity of MRI and its diagnostic value is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to clarify whether routine MRI could identify additional shoulder pathologies not previously suspected in the clinical examination and if any change in the treatment plan based on these additional MRI findings in FS patients was observed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who presented in our outpatient clinic with a diagnosis of FS from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, the number of patients who received a shoulder MRI, changes in the diagnosis or identification of structural shoulder pathologies following MRI examination (if performed), as well as any alternation in the initially suggested treatment plan were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 609 patients (male: 241, female: 368) diagnosed with an FS and an average age of 52 ± 10 (range: 18 to 81) years were identified. In 403 of the 609 patients (66%), a shoulder MRI was performed. An additional structural shoulder pathology was identified in 89 of 403 (22%) patients following the shoulder MRI, mostly rotator cuff tears (partial: 46/403 [11.4%], full-thickness: 30/403 [7.4%], rerupture following reconstruction: 10/403 [2.5%]) and labrum tears (3/403 [0.7%]). At minimum 2-year follow-up, 11 of 403 (2.7%) patients were treated surgically for the additional pathology identified on the MRI scan consisting of an arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction in 10 patients and a labrum refixation in one patient. Five of the 609 (0.8%) patients were treated for refractory FS by arthroscopic capsulotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although additional pathologies were identified in 22% of the patients, a change in treatment plan due to the MRI findings was only observed in 2.7% (37 MRIs needed to identify 1 patient with FS requiring surgery for the additional MRI findings). Therefore, routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with FS but without suspicion of an additional pathology may not be indicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94461952022-09-07 Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder Dimitriou, Dimitris Winkler, Elin Zindel, Christoph Grubhofer, Florian Wieser, Karl Bouaicha, Samy JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly performed in patients with frozen shoulder (FS). However, the necessity of MRI and its diagnostic value is questionable. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to clarify whether routine MRI could identify additional shoulder pathologies not previously suspected in the clinical examination and if any change in the treatment plan based on these additional MRI findings in FS patients was observed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of all patients who presented in our outpatient clinic with a diagnosis of FS from January 2017 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, the number of patients who received a shoulder MRI, changes in the diagnosis or identification of structural shoulder pathologies following MRI examination (if performed), as well as any alternation in the initially suggested treatment plan were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 609 patients (male: 241, female: 368) diagnosed with an FS and an average age of 52 ± 10 (range: 18 to 81) years were identified. In 403 of the 609 patients (66%), a shoulder MRI was performed. An additional structural shoulder pathology was identified in 89 of 403 (22%) patients following the shoulder MRI, mostly rotator cuff tears (partial: 46/403 [11.4%], full-thickness: 30/403 [7.4%], rerupture following reconstruction: 10/403 [2.5%]) and labrum tears (3/403 [0.7%]). At minimum 2-year follow-up, 11 of 403 (2.7%) patients were treated surgically for the additional pathology identified on the MRI scan consisting of an arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction in 10 patients and a labrum refixation in one patient. Five of the 609 (0.8%) patients were treated for refractory FS by arthroscopic capsulotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although additional pathologies were identified in 22% of the patients, a change in treatment plan due to the MRI findings was only observed in 2.7% (37 MRIs needed to identify 1 patient with FS requiring surgery for the additional MRI findings). Therefore, routine use of shoulder MRI scans in patients with FS but without suspicion of an additional pathology may not be indicated. Elsevier 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9446195/ /pubmed/36081696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Dimitriou, Dimitris
Winkler, Elin
Zindel, Christoph
Grubhofer, Florian
Wieser, Karl
Bouaicha, Samy
Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
title Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
title_full Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
title_fullStr Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
title_full_unstemmed Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
title_short Is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
title_sort is routine magnetic resonance imaging necessary in patients with clinically diagnosed frozen shoulder? utility of magnetic resonance imaging in frozen shoulder
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.009
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrioudimitris isroutinemagneticresonanceimagingnecessaryinpatientswithclinicallydiagnosedfrozenshoulderutilityofmagneticresonanceimaginginfrozenshoulder
AT winklerelin isroutinemagneticresonanceimagingnecessaryinpatientswithclinicallydiagnosedfrozenshoulderutilityofmagneticresonanceimaginginfrozenshoulder
AT zindelchristoph isroutinemagneticresonanceimagingnecessaryinpatientswithclinicallydiagnosedfrozenshoulderutilityofmagneticresonanceimaginginfrozenshoulder
AT grubhoferflorian isroutinemagneticresonanceimagingnecessaryinpatientswithclinicallydiagnosedfrozenshoulderutilityofmagneticresonanceimaginginfrozenshoulder
AT wieserkarl isroutinemagneticresonanceimagingnecessaryinpatientswithclinicallydiagnosedfrozenshoulderutilityofmagneticresonanceimaginginfrozenshoulder
AT bouaichasamy isroutinemagneticresonanceimagingnecessaryinpatientswithclinicallydiagnosedfrozenshoulderutilityofmagneticresonanceimaginginfrozenshoulder