Cargando…

Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: This study compares patient-reported outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between adults with an AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samborski, S. Andrew, Haws, Brittany E., Karnyski, Steven, Soles, Gillian, Gorczyca, John T., Nicandri, Gregg, Voloshin, Ilya, Ketz, John P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.006
_version_ 1784783609498959872
author Samborski, S. Andrew
Haws, Brittany E.
Karnyski, Steven
Soles, Gillian
Gorczyca, John T.
Nicandri, Gregg
Voloshin, Ilya
Ketz, John P.
author_facet Samborski, S. Andrew
Haws, Brittany E.
Karnyski, Steven
Soles, Gillian
Gorczyca, John T.
Nicandri, Gregg
Voloshin, Ilya
Ketz, John P.
author_sort Samborski, S. Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study compares patient-reported outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between adults with an AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients >60 years of age treated with nonoperative management, ORIF, or RSA for AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures from 2015 to 2018. Visual analog scale pain scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, ROM values, and complication and reoperation rates were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi square analysis for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included: 41 nonoperative, 23 ORIF, and 24 RSA. At the 2-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale scores and lower PROMIS pain interference scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale, PROMIS pain interference, and PF scores and better ROM (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS pain interference and PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. There was a significantly higher complication rate in the ORIF group than in the non-operative and RSA groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The management of AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures in older adults with RSA or ORIF led to early decreased pain and improved physical function and ROM compared to nonoperative management at the expense of a higher complication rate in the ORIF group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94462482022-09-07 Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty Samborski, S. Andrew Haws, Brittany E. Karnyski, Steven Soles, Gillian Gorczyca, John T. Nicandri, Gregg Voloshin, Ilya Ketz, John P. JSES Int Shoulder BACKGROUND: This study compares patient-reported outcomes and range of motion (ROM) between adults with an AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type C proximal humerus fracture managed nonoperatively, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients >60 years of age treated with nonoperative management, ORIF, or RSA for AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures from 2015 to 2018. Visual analog scale pain scores, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores, ROM values, and complication and reoperation rates were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi square analysis for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included: 41 nonoperative, 23 ORIF, and 24 RSA. At the 2-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale scores and lower PROMIS pain interference scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-week follow-up, ORIF and RSA had lower visual analog scale, PROMIS pain interference, and PF scores and better ROM (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 3-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS pain interference and PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. At the 6-month follow-up, ORIF and RSA had better ROM and PROMIS PF scores (P < .05) than nonoperative treatment. There was a significantly higher complication rate in the ORIF group than in the non-operative and RSA groups (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The management of AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 11C proximal humerus fractures in older adults with RSA or ORIF led to early decreased pain and improved physical function and ROM compared to nonoperative management at the expense of a higher complication rate in the ORIF group. Elsevier 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9446248/ /pubmed/36081702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.006 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Shoulder
Samborski, S. Andrew
Haws, Brittany E.
Karnyski, Steven
Soles, Gillian
Gorczyca, John T.
Nicandri, Gregg
Voloshin, Ilya
Ketz, John P.
Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_full Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_fullStr Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_short Outcomes for type C proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
title_sort outcomes for type c proximal humerus fractures in the adult population: comparison of nonoperative treatment, locked plate fixation, and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
topic Shoulder
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2022.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT samborskisandrew outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT hawsbrittanye outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT karnyskisteven outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT solesgillian outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT gorczycajohnt outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT nicandrigregg outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT voloshinilya outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty
AT ketzjohnp outcomesfortypecproximalhumerusfracturesintheadultpopulationcomparisonofnonoperativetreatmentlockedplatefixationandreverseshoulderarthroplasty