Cargando…

Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States

The COVID-19 pandemic presents a continued public health challenge. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States use RT-rtPCR for animal testing, and many laboratories are certified for testing human samples; hence, ensuring that laboratories have sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 testing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, Kaiping, Uhlig, Steffen, Goodman, Laura B., Ip, Hon S., Killian, Mary Lea, Nemser, Sarah M., Ulaszek, Jodie, Kiener, Shannon, Kmet, Matthew, Frost, Kirstin, Hettwer, Karina, Colson, Bertrand, Nichani, Kapil, Schlierf, Anja, Tkachenko, Andriy, Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang, Scott, Andrew, Reddy, Ravinder, Tyson, Gregory H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387221115702
_version_ 1784783616848429056
author Deng, Kaiping
Uhlig, Steffen
Goodman, Laura B.
Ip, Hon S.
Killian, Mary Lea
Nemser, Sarah M.
Ulaszek, Jodie
Kiener, Shannon
Kmet, Matthew
Frost, Kirstin
Hettwer, Karina
Colson, Bertrand
Nichani, Kapil
Schlierf, Anja
Tkachenko, Andriy
Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang
Scott, Andrew
Reddy, Ravinder
Tyson, Gregory H.
author_facet Deng, Kaiping
Uhlig, Steffen
Goodman, Laura B.
Ip, Hon S.
Killian, Mary Lea
Nemser, Sarah M.
Ulaszek, Jodie
Kiener, Shannon
Kmet, Matthew
Frost, Kirstin
Hettwer, Karina
Colson, Bertrand
Nichani, Kapil
Schlierf, Anja
Tkachenko, Andriy
Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang
Scott, Andrew
Reddy, Ravinder
Tyson, Gregory H.
author_sort Deng, Kaiping
collection PubMed
description The COVID-19 pandemic presents a continued public health challenge. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States use RT-rtPCR for animal testing, and many laboratories are certified for testing human samples; hence, ensuring that laboratories have sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 testing methods is a critical component of the pandemic response. In 2020, the FDA Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN) led an interlaboratory comparison (ILC1) to help laboratories evaluate their existing RT-rtPCR methods for detecting SARS-CoV2. All participating laboratories were able to detect the viral RNA spiked in buffer and PrimeStore molecular transport medium (MTM). With ILC2, Vet-LIRN extended ILC1 by evaluating analytical sensitivity and specificity of the methods used by participating laboratories to detect 3 SARS-CoV2 variants (B.1; B.1.1.7 [Alpha]; B.1.351 [Beta]) at various copy levels. We analyzed 57 sets of results from 45 laboratories qualitatively and quantitatively according to the principles of ISO 16140-2:2016. More than 95% of analysts detected the SARS-CoV2 RNA in MTM at ≥500 copies for all 3 variants. In addition, for nucleocapsid markers N1 and N2, 81% and 92% of the analysts detected ≤20 copies in the assays, respectively. The analytical specificity of the evaluated methods was >99%. Participating laboratories were able to assess their current method performance, identify possible limitations, and recognize method strengths as part of a continuous learning environment to support the critical need for the reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 in potentially infected animals and humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94462912022-09-07 Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States Deng, Kaiping Uhlig, Steffen Goodman, Laura B. Ip, Hon S. Killian, Mary Lea Nemser, Sarah M. Ulaszek, Jodie Kiener, Shannon Kmet, Matthew Frost, Kirstin Hettwer, Karina Colson, Bertrand Nichani, Kapil Schlierf, Anja Tkachenko, Andriy Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang Scott, Andrew Reddy, Ravinder Tyson, Gregory H. J Vet Diagn Invest Full Scientific Reports The COVID-19 pandemic presents a continued public health challenge. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States use RT-rtPCR for animal testing, and many laboratories are certified for testing human samples; hence, ensuring that laboratories have sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 testing methods is a critical component of the pandemic response. In 2020, the FDA Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN) led an interlaboratory comparison (ILC1) to help laboratories evaluate their existing RT-rtPCR methods for detecting SARS-CoV2. All participating laboratories were able to detect the viral RNA spiked in buffer and PrimeStore molecular transport medium (MTM). With ILC2, Vet-LIRN extended ILC1 by evaluating analytical sensitivity and specificity of the methods used by participating laboratories to detect 3 SARS-CoV2 variants (B.1; B.1.1.7 [Alpha]; B.1.351 [Beta]) at various copy levels. We analyzed 57 sets of results from 45 laboratories qualitatively and quantitatively according to the principles of ISO 16140-2:2016. More than 95% of analysts detected the SARS-CoV2 RNA in MTM at ≥500 copies for all 3 variants. In addition, for nucleocapsid markers N1 and N2, 81% and 92% of the analysts detected ≤20 copies in the assays, respectively. The analytical specificity of the evaluated methods was >99%. Participating laboratories were able to assess their current method performance, identify possible limitations, and recognize method strengths as part of a continuous learning environment to support the critical need for the reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 in potentially infected animals and humans. SAGE Publications 2022-08-18 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9446291/ /pubmed/35983593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387221115702 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Full Scientific Reports
Deng, Kaiping
Uhlig, Steffen
Goodman, Laura B.
Ip, Hon S.
Killian, Mary Lea
Nemser, Sarah M.
Ulaszek, Jodie
Kiener, Shannon
Kmet, Matthew
Frost, Kirstin
Hettwer, Karina
Colson, Bertrand
Nichani, Kapil
Schlierf, Anja
Tkachenko, Andriy
Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang
Scott, Andrew
Reddy, Ravinder
Tyson, Gregory H.
Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
title Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
title_full Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
title_fullStr Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
title_short Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
title_sort second round of an interlaboratory comparison of sars-cov2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the united states
topic Full Scientific Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983593
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387221115702
work_keys_str_mv AT dengkaiping secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT uhligsteffen secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT goodmanlaurab secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT iphons secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT killianmarylea secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT nemsersarahm secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT ulaszekjodie secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT kienershannon secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT kmetmatthew secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT frostkirstin secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT hettwerkarina secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT colsonbertrand secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT nichanikapil secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT schlierfanja secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT tkachenkoandriy secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT mlalazioyinloyemothomang secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT scottandrew secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT reddyravinder secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates
AT tysongregoryh secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates