Cargando…
Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States
The COVID-19 pandemic presents a continued public health challenge. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States use RT-rtPCR for animal testing, and many laboratories are certified for testing human samples; hence, ensuring that laboratories have sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 testing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387221115702 |
_version_ | 1784783616848429056 |
---|---|
author | Deng, Kaiping Uhlig, Steffen Goodman, Laura B. Ip, Hon S. Killian, Mary Lea Nemser, Sarah M. Ulaszek, Jodie Kiener, Shannon Kmet, Matthew Frost, Kirstin Hettwer, Karina Colson, Bertrand Nichani, Kapil Schlierf, Anja Tkachenko, Andriy Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang Scott, Andrew Reddy, Ravinder Tyson, Gregory H. |
author_facet | Deng, Kaiping Uhlig, Steffen Goodman, Laura B. Ip, Hon S. Killian, Mary Lea Nemser, Sarah M. Ulaszek, Jodie Kiener, Shannon Kmet, Matthew Frost, Kirstin Hettwer, Karina Colson, Bertrand Nichani, Kapil Schlierf, Anja Tkachenko, Andriy Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang Scott, Andrew Reddy, Ravinder Tyson, Gregory H. |
author_sort | Deng, Kaiping |
collection | PubMed |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic presents a continued public health challenge. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States use RT-rtPCR for animal testing, and many laboratories are certified for testing human samples; hence, ensuring that laboratories have sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 testing methods is a critical component of the pandemic response. In 2020, the FDA Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN) led an interlaboratory comparison (ILC1) to help laboratories evaluate their existing RT-rtPCR methods for detecting SARS-CoV2. All participating laboratories were able to detect the viral RNA spiked in buffer and PrimeStore molecular transport medium (MTM). With ILC2, Vet-LIRN extended ILC1 by evaluating analytical sensitivity and specificity of the methods used by participating laboratories to detect 3 SARS-CoV2 variants (B.1; B.1.1.7 [Alpha]; B.1.351 [Beta]) at various copy levels. We analyzed 57 sets of results from 45 laboratories qualitatively and quantitatively according to the principles of ISO 16140-2:2016. More than 95% of analysts detected the SARS-CoV2 RNA in MTM at ≥500 copies for all 3 variants. In addition, for nucleocapsid markers N1 and N2, 81% and 92% of the analysts detected ≤20 copies in the assays, respectively. The analytical specificity of the evaluated methods was >99%. Participating laboratories were able to assess their current method performance, identify possible limitations, and recognize method strengths as part of a continuous learning environment to support the critical need for the reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 in potentially infected animals and humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9446291 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94462912022-09-07 Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States Deng, Kaiping Uhlig, Steffen Goodman, Laura B. Ip, Hon S. Killian, Mary Lea Nemser, Sarah M. Ulaszek, Jodie Kiener, Shannon Kmet, Matthew Frost, Kirstin Hettwer, Karina Colson, Bertrand Nichani, Kapil Schlierf, Anja Tkachenko, Andriy Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang Scott, Andrew Reddy, Ravinder Tyson, Gregory H. J Vet Diagn Invest Full Scientific Reports The COVID-19 pandemic presents a continued public health challenge. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States use RT-rtPCR for animal testing, and many laboratories are certified for testing human samples; hence, ensuring that laboratories have sensitive and specific SARS-CoV2 testing methods is a critical component of the pandemic response. In 2020, the FDA Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN) led an interlaboratory comparison (ILC1) to help laboratories evaluate their existing RT-rtPCR methods for detecting SARS-CoV2. All participating laboratories were able to detect the viral RNA spiked in buffer and PrimeStore molecular transport medium (MTM). With ILC2, Vet-LIRN extended ILC1 by evaluating analytical sensitivity and specificity of the methods used by participating laboratories to detect 3 SARS-CoV2 variants (B.1; B.1.1.7 [Alpha]; B.1.351 [Beta]) at various copy levels. We analyzed 57 sets of results from 45 laboratories qualitatively and quantitatively according to the principles of ISO 16140-2:2016. More than 95% of analysts detected the SARS-CoV2 RNA in MTM at ≥500 copies for all 3 variants. In addition, for nucleocapsid markers N1 and N2, 81% and 92% of the analysts detected ≤20 copies in the assays, respectively. The analytical specificity of the evaluated methods was >99%. Participating laboratories were able to assess their current method performance, identify possible limitations, and recognize method strengths as part of a continuous learning environment to support the critical need for the reliable diagnosis of COVID-19 in potentially infected animals and humans. SAGE Publications 2022-08-18 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9446291/ /pubmed/35983593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387221115702 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Full Scientific Reports Deng, Kaiping Uhlig, Steffen Goodman, Laura B. Ip, Hon S. Killian, Mary Lea Nemser, Sarah M. Ulaszek, Jodie Kiener, Shannon Kmet, Matthew Frost, Kirstin Hettwer, Karina Colson, Bertrand Nichani, Kapil Schlierf, Anja Tkachenko, Andriy Mlalazi-Oyinloye, Mothomang Scott, Andrew Reddy, Ravinder Tyson, Gregory H. Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United States |
title | Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular
detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United
States |
title_full | Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular
detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United
States |
title_fullStr | Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular
detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United
States |
title_full_unstemmed | Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular
detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United
States |
title_short | Second round of an interlaboratory comparison of SARS-CoV2 molecular
detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the United
States |
title_sort | second round of an interlaboratory comparison of sars-cov2 molecular
detection assays used by 45 veterinary diagnostic laboratories in the united
states |
topic | Full Scientific Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446291/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35983593 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387221115702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dengkaiping secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT uhligsteffen secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT goodmanlaurab secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT iphons secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT killianmarylea secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT nemsersarahm secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT ulaszekjodie secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT kienershannon secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT kmetmatthew secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT frostkirstin secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT hettwerkarina secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT colsonbertrand secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT nichanikapil secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT schlierfanja secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT tkachenkoandriy secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT mlalazioyinloyemothomang secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT scottandrew secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT reddyravinder secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates AT tysongregoryh secondroundofaninterlaboratorycomparisonofsarscov2moleculardetectionassaysusedby45veterinarydiagnosticlaboratoriesintheunitedstates |