Cargando…
P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120042 |
_version_ | 1784783623112622080 |
---|---|
author | Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo Rabelo, Camila Maia Moreira, Renata Rodrigues Matas, Carla Gentile Schochat, Eliane Samelli, Alessandra Giannella |
author_facet | Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo Rabelo, Camila Maia Moreira, Renata Rodrigues Matas, Carla Gentile Schochat, Eliane Samelli, Alessandra Giannella |
author_sort | Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This prospective study enrolled 25 individuals with normal hearing thresholds. The subjects were divided into two groups: individuals exposed to occupational noise (13 subjects; case group) and individuals not exposed to occupational noise (12 subjects; control group). The P300 test was used with verbal and non-verbal stimuli. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between ears for any of the stimuli or between groups. The groups had no statistically significant difference for verbal or non-verbal stimuli. Case group subjects had longer latencies than controls. In qualitative analysis, a greater number of altered P300 test results for verbal and non-verbal stimuli was seen in the case group, despite the absence of statistically significant differences between case and control subjects. CONCLUSION: Individuals exposed to high sound pressure levels had longer P300 latencies in verbal and non-verbal stimuli when compared to controls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9446350 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94463502022-09-09 P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo Rabelo, Camila Maia Moreira, Renata Rodrigues Matas, Carla Gentile Schochat, Eliane Samelli, Alessandra Giannella Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This prospective study enrolled 25 individuals with normal hearing thresholds. The subjects were divided into two groups: individuals exposed to occupational noise (13 subjects; case group) and individuals not exposed to occupational noise (12 subjects; control group). The P300 test was used with verbal and non-verbal stimuli. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between ears for any of the stimuli or between groups. The groups had no statistically significant difference for verbal or non-verbal stimuli. Case group subjects had longer latencies than controls. In qualitative analysis, a greater number of altered P300 test results for verbal and non-verbal stimuli was seen in the case group, despite the absence of statistically significant differences between case and control subjects. CONCLUSION: Individuals exposed to high sound pressure levels had longer P300 latencies in verbal and non-verbal stimuli when compared to controls. Elsevier 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9446350/ /pubmed/23306577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120042 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo Rabelo, Camila Maia Moreira, Renata Rodrigues Matas, Carla Gentile Schochat, Eliane Samelli, Alessandra Giannella P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
title | P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
title_full | P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
title_fullStr | P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
title_full_unstemmed | P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
title_short | P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
title_sort | p300 in workers exposed to occupational noise |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446350/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT massacamilagoncalvespolo p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise AT rabelocamilamaia p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise AT moreirarenatarodrigues p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise AT matascarlagentile p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise AT schochateliane p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise AT samellialessandragiannella p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise |