Cargando…

P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise

The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo, Rabelo, Camila Maia, Moreira, Renata Rodrigues, Matas, Carla Gentile, Schochat, Eliane, Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306577
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120042
_version_ 1784783623112622080
author Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo
Rabelo, Camila Maia
Moreira, Renata Rodrigues
Matas, Carla Gentile
Schochat, Eliane
Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
author_facet Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo
Rabelo, Camila Maia
Moreira, Renata Rodrigues
Matas, Carla Gentile
Schochat, Eliane
Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
author_sort Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo
collection PubMed
description The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This prospective study enrolled 25 individuals with normal hearing thresholds. The subjects were divided into two groups: individuals exposed to occupational noise (13 subjects; case group) and individuals not exposed to occupational noise (12 subjects; control group). The P300 test was used with verbal and non-verbal stimuli. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between ears for any of the stimuli or between groups. The groups had no statistically significant difference for verbal or non-verbal stimuli. Case group subjects had longer latencies than controls. In qualitative analysis, a greater number of altered P300 test results for verbal and non-verbal stimuli was seen in the case group, despite the absence of statistically significant differences between case and control subjects. CONCLUSION: Individuals exposed to high sound pressure levels had longer P300 latencies in verbal and non-verbal stimuli when compared to controls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94463502022-09-09 P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo Rabelo, Camila Maia Moreira, Renata Rodrigues Matas, Carla Gentile Schochat, Eliane Samelli, Alessandra Giannella Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article The harm upon the central auditory pathways of workers exposed to occupational noise has been scarcely studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess the central auditory pathways by testing the long latency auditory evoked potentials (P300) of individuals exposed to occupational noise and controls. METHOD: This prospective study enrolled 25 individuals with normal hearing thresholds. The subjects were divided into two groups: individuals exposed to occupational noise (13 subjects; case group) and individuals not exposed to occupational noise (12 subjects; control group). The P300 test was used with verbal and non-verbal stimuli. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between ears for any of the stimuli or between groups. The groups had no statistically significant difference for verbal or non-verbal stimuli. Case group subjects had longer latencies than controls. In qualitative analysis, a greater number of altered P300 test results for verbal and non-verbal stimuli was seen in the case group, despite the absence of statistically significant differences between case and control subjects. CONCLUSION: Individuals exposed to high sound pressure levels had longer P300 latencies in verbal and non-verbal stimuli when compared to controls. Elsevier 2015-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9446350/ /pubmed/23306577 http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120042 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Massa, Camila Gonçalves Polo
Rabelo, Camila Maia
Moreira, Renata Rodrigues
Matas, Carla Gentile
Schochat, Eliane
Samelli, Alessandra Giannella
P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
title P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
title_full P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
title_fullStr P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
title_full_unstemmed P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
title_short P300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
title_sort p300 in workers exposed to occupational noise
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23306577
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1808-8694.20120042
work_keys_str_mv AT massacamilagoncalvespolo p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise
AT rabelocamilamaia p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise
AT moreirarenatarodrigues p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise
AT matascarlagentile p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise
AT schochateliane p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise
AT samellialessandragiannella p300inworkersexposedtooccupationalnoise