Cargando…

Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a priority health problem affecting 36% of Egyptians. Adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) have multidifferentiation capacity and the ability to restore several types of cells including damaged renal cells. Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) is k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morsy, Shereen, Mansour, Mona F., Abdo, Mohamed, El‐Wazir, Yasser
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065849
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15448
_version_ 1784783634655346688
author Morsy, Shereen
Mansour, Mona F.
Abdo, Mohamed
El‐Wazir, Yasser
author_facet Morsy, Shereen
Mansour, Mona F.
Abdo, Mohamed
El‐Wazir, Yasser
author_sort Morsy, Shereen
collection PubMed
description Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a priority health problem affecting 36% of Egyptians. Adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) have multidifferentiation capacity and the ability to restore several types of cells including damaged renal cells. Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) is known to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to the peripheral circulation. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of endogenous CD34(+) cells mobilization and exogenous ADMSCs administration in the treatment of a rat model of adriamycin (ADR)‐induced CKD. A total of 48 male albino rats of the local strain (200 ± 50 g) were equally divided into four groups: control negative, ADR (control positive), ADMSCs group, and G‐CSF group. Six rats from each group were sacrificed after 4 weeks and the other 6 after 12 weeks. Renal function was assessed frequently by measuring serum creatinine, albumin, urea, 24‐h urinary protein level, and hemoglobin level throughout the study. Oxidative stress markers malondialdehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant (TAO) were measured on day 28. CD‐34(+) cell percentage was measured on day 9. After the sacrification of the rats, kidneys were removed for histopathological assessment. Results revealed that both ADMSCs and G‐CSF significantly improved serum creatinine, albumin, urea, 24‐h urinary protein level, and histopathological damage score, with the G‐CSF‐treated group showing better improvement in 24‐h urinary protein level, serum albumin, and histopathological damage score compared with ADMSCs‐treated group. The G‐CSF group also had significantly higher levels of CD34(+) cells. Oxidative stress markers (MDA and TAO) levels were significantly improved with both therapies. We conclude that mobilization of endogenous hematopoietic stem cells by G‐CSF is more effective than exogenously injected ADMSCs in protecting the kidneys against AD‐induced toxicity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94464042022-09-09 Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease? Morsy, Shereen Mansour, Mona F. Abdo, Mohamed El‐Wazir, Yasser Physiol Rep Original Articles Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a priority health problem affecting 36% of Egyptians. Adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs) have multidifferentiation capacity and the ability to restore several types of cells including damaged renal cells. Granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) is known to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells from bone marrow to the peripheral circulation. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of endogenous CD34(+) cells mobilization and exogenous ADMSCs administration in the treatment of a rat model of adriamycin (ADR)‐induced CKD. A total of 48 male albino rats of the local strain (200 ± 50 g) were equally divided into four groups: control negative, ADR (control positive), ADMSCs group, and G‐CSF group. Six rats from each group were sacrificed after 4 weeks and the other 6 after 12 weeks. Renal function was assessed frequently by measuring serum creatinine, albumin, urea, 24‐h urinary protein level, and hemoglobin level throughout the study. Oxidative stress markers malondialdehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant (TAO) were measured on day 28. CD‐34(+) cell percentage was measured on day 9. After the sacrification of the rats, kidneys were removed for histopathological assessment. Results revealed that both ADMSCs and G‐CSF significantly improved serum creatinine, albumin, urea, 24‐h urinary protein level, and histopathological damage score, with the G‐CSF‐treated group showing better improvement in 24‐h urinary protein level, serum albumin, and histopathological damage score compared with ADMSCs‐treated group. The G‐CSF group also had significantly higher levels of CD34(+) cells. Oxidative stress markers (MDA and TAO) levels were significantly improved with both therapies. We conclude that mobilization of endogenous hematopoietic stem cells by G‐CSF is more effective than exogenously injected ADMSCs in protecting the kidneys against AD‐induced toxicity. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9446404/ /pubmed/36065849 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15448 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Morsy, Shereen
Mansour, Mona F.
Abdo, Mohamed
El‐Wazir, Yasser
Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
title Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
title_full Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
title_fullStr Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
title_full_unstemmed Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
title_short Can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
title_sort can mobilization of bone marrow stem cells be an alternative regenerative therapy to stem cell injection in a rat model of chronic kidney disease?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36065849
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15448
work_keys_str_mv AT morsyshereen canmobilizationofbonemarrowstemcellsbeanalternativeregenerativetherapytostemcellinjectioninaratmodelofchronickidneydisease
AT mansourmonaf canmobilizationofbonemarrowstemcellsbeanalternativeregenerativetherapytostemcellinjectioninaratmodelofchronickidneydisease
AT abdomohamed canmobilizationofbonemarrowstemcellsbeanalternativeregenerativetherapytostemcellinjectioninaratmodelofchronickidneydisease
AT elwaziryasser canmobilizationofbonemarrowstemcellsbeanalternativeregenerativetherapytostemcellinjectioninaratmodelofchronickidneydisease