Cargando…
Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
OBJECTIVE: To perform a preliminary usability evaluation of a novel, compact pneumatic compression device in patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm trial had two phases: the first focused on the fitting of the pneumatic compression device (Aria Free(TM), Aria Health, San Die...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555221096298 |
_version_ | 1784783638946119680 |
---|---|
author | Devitt, Martin Ramanan, Dinesh Armitstead, Jeff Zhu, Xueling Mackie, Helen |
author_facet | Devitt, Martin Ramanan, Dinesh Armitstead, Jeff Zhu, Xueling Mackie, Helen |
author_sort | Devitt, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To perform a preliminary usability evaluation of a novel, compact pneumatic compression device in patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm trial had two phases: the first focused on the fitting of the pneumatic compression device (Aria Free(TM), Aria Health, San Diego CA, USA) and the second focused on evaluating the comfort of the entire system during a 45-min usage period. Both phases were conducted in a monitored clinical environment. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of lower limb lymphoedema who had used a pneumatic compression device for ≥3 months were eligible. Patients rated subjective fit, comfort and usability on an 11-point Likert scale (where higher scores indicate better fit/comfort/usability). The truncated cone method was used to infer limb volume before and after therapy in phase 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were screened, and 15 were enrolled (80% female; mean age 62 years); all completed both study phases. Patients rated the garment as easy to set up and fit (median score 6.5), and all reported that the therapy was comfortable (median score 10; p < 0.001 vs. reference score of 6). There was a 1.85% reduction in limb volume after device use for 45 min (p = 0.018 vs. before therapy). No safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The new pneumatic compression device fitted well, was easy to use and reduced leg oedema. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9446425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94464252022-09-07 Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study Devitt, Martin Ramanan, Dinesh Armitstead, Jeff Zhu, Xueling Mackie, Helen Phlebology Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To perform a preliminary usability evaluation of a novel, compact pneumatic compression device in patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm trial had two phases: the first focused on the fitting of the pneumatic compression device (Aria Free(TM), Aria Health, San Diego CA, USA) and the second focused on evaluating the comfort of the entire system during a 45-min usage period. Both phases were conducted in a monitored clinical environment. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of lower limb lymphoedema who had used a pneumatic compression device for ≥3 months were eligible. Patients rated subjective fit, comfort and usability on an 11-point Likert scale (where higher scores indicate better fit/comfort/usability). The truncated cone method was used to infer limb volume before and after therapy in phase 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were screened, and 15 were enrolled (80% female; mean age 62 years); all completed both study phases. Patients rated the garment as easy to set up and fit (median score 6.5), and all reported that the therapy was comfortable (median score 10; p < 0.001 vs. reference score of 6). There was a 1.85% reduction in limb volume after device use for 45 min (p = 0.018 vs. before therapy). No safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The new pneumatic compression device fitted well, was easy to use and reduced leg oedema. SAGE Publications 2022-05-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9446425/ /pubmed/35503339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555221096298 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Devitt, Martin Ramanan, Dinesh Armitstead, Jeff Zhu, Xueling Mackie, Helen Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study |
title | Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device
for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study |
title_full | Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device
for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study |
title_fullStr | Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device
for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study |
title_full_unstemmed | Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device
for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study |
title_short | Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device
for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study |
title_sort | usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device
for the treatment of lymphoedema: pilot study |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555221096298 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devittmartin usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy AT ramanandinesh usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy AT armitsteadjeff usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy AT zhuxueling usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy AT mackiehelen usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy |