Cargando…

Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study

OBJECTIVE: To perform a preliminary usability evaluation of a novel, compact pneumatic compression device in patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm trial had two phases: the first focused on the fitting of the pneumatic compression device (Aria Free(TM), Aria Health, San Die...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devitt, Martin, Ramanan, Dinesh, Armitstead, Jeff, Zhu, Xueling, Mackie, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555221096298
_version_ 1784783638946119680
author Devitt, Martin
Ramanan, Dinesh
Armitstead, Jeff
Zhu, Xueling
Mackie, Helen
author_facet Devitt, Martin
Ramanan, Dinesh
Armitstead, Jeff
Zhu, Xueling
Mackie, Helen
author_sort Devitt, Martin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To perform a preliminary usability evaluation of a novel, compact pneumatic compression device in patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm trial had two phases: the first focused on the fitting of the pneumatic compression device (Aria Free(TM), Aria Health, San Diego CA, USA) and the second focused on evaluating the comfort of the entire system during a 45-min usage period. Both phases were conducted in a monitored clinical environment. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of lower limb lymphoedema who had used a pneumatic compression device for ≥3 months were eligible. Patients rated subjective fit, comfort and usability on an 11-point Likert scale (where higher scores indicate better fit/comfort/usability). The truncated cone method was used to infer limb volume before and after therapy in phase 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were screened, and 15 were enrolled (80% female; mean age 62 years); all completed both study phases. Patients rated the garment as easy to set up and fit (median score 6.5), and all reported that the therapy was comfortable (median score 10; p < 0.001 vs. reference score of 6). There was a 1.85% reduction in limb volume after device use for 45 min (p = 0.018 vs. before therapy). No safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The new pneumatic compression device fitted well, was easy to use and reduced leg oedema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94464252022-09-07 Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study Devitt, Martin Ramanan, Dinesh Armitstead, Jeff Zhu, Xueling Mackie, Helen Phlebology Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To perform a preliminary usability evaluation of a novel, compact pneumatic compression device in patients with lymphoedema. METHODS: This open-label, single-arm trial had two phases: the first focused on the fitting of the pneumatic compression device (Aria Free(TM), Aria Health, San Diego CA, USA) and the second focused on evaluating the comfort of the entire system during a 45-min usage period. Both phases were conducted in a monitored clinical environment. Patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of lower limb lymphoedema who had used a pneumatic compression device for ≥3 months were eligible. Patients rated subjective fit, comfort and usability on an 11-point Likert scale (where higher scores indicate better fit/comfort/usability). The truncated cone method was used to infer limb volume before and after therapy in phase 2. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were screened, and 15 were enrolled (80% female; mean age 62 years); all completed both study phases. Patients rated the garment as easy to set up and fit (median score 6.5), and all reported that the therapy was comfortable (median score 10; p < 0.001 vs. reference score of 6). There was a 1.85% reduction in limb volume after device use for 45 min (p = 0.018 vs. before therapy). No safety issues were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The new pneumatic compression device fitted well, was easy to use and reduced leg oedema. SAGE Publications 2022-05-03 2022-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9446425/ /pubmed/35503339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555221096298 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Devitt, Martin
Ramanan, Dinesh
Armitstead, Jeff
Zhu, Xueling
Mackie, Helen
Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
title Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
title_full Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
title_fullStr Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
title_short Usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: Pilot study
title_sort usability evaluation of a novel compact pneumatic compression device for the treatment of lymphoedema: pilot study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02683555221096298
work_keys_str_mv AT devittmartin usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy
AT ramanandinesh usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy
AT armitsteadjeff usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy
AT zhuxueling usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy
AT mackiehelen usabilityevaluationofanovelcompactpneumaticcompressiondeviceforthetreatmentoflymphoedemapilotstudy