Cargando…

The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery

BACKGROUND: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sundelin, Maria Ordell, Paltved, Charlotte, Kingo, Pernille Skjold, Kjölhede, Henrik, Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2
_version_ 1784783667846971392
author Sundelin, Maria Ordell
Paltved, Charlotte
Kingo, Pernille Skjold
Kjölhede, Henrik
Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
author_facet Sundelin, Maria Ordell
Paltved, Charlotte
Kingo, Pernille Skjold
Kjölhede, Henrik
Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
author_sort Sundelin, Maria Ordell
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy. METHODS: Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)). RESULTS: The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62–64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02–109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96–141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37–19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70–21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29–24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group. CONCLUSION: In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94465602022-09-07 The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery Sundelin, Maria Ordell Paltved, Charlotte Kingo, Pernille Skjold Kjölhede, Henrik Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy. METHODS: Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)). RESULTS: The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62–64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02–109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96–141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37–19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70–21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29–24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group. CONCLUSION: In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects. BioMed Central 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9446560/ /pubmed/36064750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sundelin, Maria Ordell
Paltved, Charlotte
Kingo, Pernille Skjold
Kjölhede, Henrik
Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard
The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
title The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
title_full The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
title_fullStr The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
title_full_unstemmed The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
title_short The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
title_sort transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sundelinmariaordell thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT paltvedcharlotte thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT kingopernilleskjold thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT kjolhedehenrik thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT jensenjørgenbjerggaard thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT sundelinmariaordell transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT paltvedcharlotte transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT kingopernilleskjold transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT kjolhedehenrik transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery
AT jensenjørgenbjerggaard transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery