Cargando…
The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery
BACKGROUND: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2 |
_version_ | 1784783667846971392 |
---|---|
author | Sundelin, Maria Ordell Paltved, Charlotte Kingo, Pernille Skjold Kjölhede, Henrik Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard |
author_facet | Sundelin, Maria Ordell Paltved, Charlotte Kingo, Pernille Skjold Kjölhede, Henrik Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard |
author_sort | Sundelin, Maria Ordell |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy. METHODS: Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)). RESULTS: The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62–64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02–109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96–141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37–19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70–21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29–24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group. CONCLUSION: In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9446560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94465602022-09-07 The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery Sundelin, Maria Ordell Paltved, Charlotte Kingo, Pernille Skjold Kjölhede, Henrik Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Within the last decades, robotic surgery has gained popularity. Most robotic surgeons have changed their main surgical activity from open or laparoscopic without prior formal robotic training. With the current practice, it is of great interest to know whether there is a transfer of surgical skills. In visualization, motion scaling, and freedom of motion, robotic surgery resembles open surgery far more than laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, our hypothesis is that open-trained surgeons have more transfer of surgical skills to robotic surgery, compared to surgeons trained in laparoscopy. METHODS: Thirty-six surgically inexperienced medical students were randomized into three groups for intensive simulation training in an assigned modality: open surgery, laparoscopy, or robot-assisted laparoscopy. The training period was, for all study subjects, followed by performing a robot-assisted bowel anastomosis in a pig model. As surrogate markers of surgical quality, the anastomoses were tested for resistance to pressure, and video recordings of the procedure were evaluated by two blinded expert robotic surgeons, using a global rating scale of robotic operative performance (Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)). RESULTS: The mean leak pressure of bowel anastomosis was 36.25 (7.62–64.89) mmHg in the laparoscopic training group and 69.01 (28.02–109.99) mmHg in the open surgery group, and the mean leak pressure for the robotic training group was 108.45 (74.96–141.94) mmHg. The same pattern was found with GEARS as surrogate markers of surgical quality. GEARS score was 15.71 (12.37–19.04) in the laparoscopic training group, 18.14 (14.70–21.58) in the open surgery group, and 22.04 (19.29–24.79) in the robotic training group. In comparison with the laparoscopic training group, the robotic training group had a statistically higher leak pressure (p = 0.0015) and GEARS score (p = 0.0023). No significant difference, for neither leak pressure nor GEARS, between the open and the robotic training group. CONCLUSION: In our study, training in open surgery was superior to training in laparoscopy when transitioning to robotic surgery in a simulation setting performed by surgically naive study subjects. BioMed Central 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9446560/ /pubmed/36064750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sundelin, Maria Ordell Paltved, Charlotte Kingo, Pernille Skjold Kjölhede, Henrik Jensen, Jørgen Bjerggaard The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
title | The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
title_full | The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
title_fullStr | The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
title_short | The transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
title_sort | transferability of laparoscopic and open surgical skills to robotic surgery |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-022-00223-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sundelinmariaordell thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT paltvedcharlotte thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT kingopernilleskjold thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT kjolhedehenrik thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT jensenjørgenbjerggaard thetransferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT sundelinmariaordell transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT paltvedcharlotte transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT kingopernilleskjold transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT kjolhedehenrik transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery AT jensenjørgenbjerggaard transferabilityoflaparoscopicandopensurgicalskillstoroboticsurgery |