Cargando…

Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images

OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of deep learning models to diagnose vertical root fracture in vivo on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CBCT images of 276 teeth (138 VRF teeth and 138 non-VRF teeth) were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic resu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Ziyang, Cao, Dantong, Hu, Yanni, Wang, Baixin, Zhang, Yifan, Tang, Rong, Zhuang, Jia, Gao, Antian, Chen, Ying, Lin, Zitong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02422-9
_version_ 1784783719609925632
author Hu, Ziyang
Cao, Dantong
Hu, Yanni
Wang, Baixin
Zhang, Yifan
Tang, Rong
Zhuang, Jia
Gao, Antian
Chen, Ying
Lin, Zitong
author_facet Hu, Ziyang
Cao, Dantong
Hu, Yanni
Wang, Baixin
Zhang, Yifan
Tang, Rong
Zhuang, Jia
Gao, Antian
Chen, Ying
Lin, Zitong
author_sort Hu, Ziyang
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of deep learning models to diagnose vertical root fracture in vivo on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CBCT images of 276 teeth (138 VRF teeth and 138 non-VRF teeth) were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic results of these teeth were confirmed by two chief radiologists. There were two experimental groups: auto-selection group and manual selection group. A total of 552 regions of interest of teeth were cropped in manual selection group and 1118 regions of interest of teeth were cropped in auto-selection group. Three deep learning networks (ResNet50, VGG19 and DenseNet169) were used for diagnosis (3:1 for training and testing). The diagnostic efficiencies (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC)) of three networks were calculated in two experiment groups. Meanwhile, 552 teeth images in manual selection group were diagnosed by a radiologist. The diagnostic efficiencies of the three deep learning network models in two experiment groups and the radiologist were calculated. RESULTS: In manual selection group, ResNet50 presented highest accuracy and sensitivity for diagnosing VRF teeth. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC was 97.8%, 97.0%, 98.5%, and 0.99, the radiologist presented accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity as 95.3%, 96.4 and 94.2%. In auto-selection group, ResNet50 presented highest accuracy and sensitivity for diagnosing VRF teeth, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC was 91.4%, 92.1%, 90.7% and 0.96. CONCLUSION: In manual selection group, ResNet50 presented higher diagnostic efficiency in diagnosis of in vivo VRF teeth than VGG19, DensenNet169 and radiologist with 2 years of experience. In auto-selection group, Resnet50 also presented higher diagnostic efficiency in diagnosis of in vivo VRF teeth than VGG19 and DensenNet169. This makes it a promising auxiliary diagnostic technique to screen for VRF teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9446797
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94467972022-09-07 Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images Hu, Ziyang Cao, Dantong Hu, Yanni Wang, Baixin Zhang, Yifan Tang, Rong Zhuang, Jia Gao, Antian Chen, Ying Lin, Zitong BMC Oral Health Research OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the diagnostic efficiency of deep learning models to diagnose vertical root fracture in vivo on cone-beam CT (CBCT) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The CBCT images of 276 teeth (138 VRF teeth and 138 non-VRF teeth) were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. The diagnostic results of these teeth were confirmed by two chief radiologists. There were two experimental groups: auto-selection group and manual selection group. A total of 552 regions of interest of teeth were cropped in manual selection group and 1118 regions of interest of teeth were cropped in auto-selection group. Three deep learning networks (ResNet50, VGG19 and DenseNet169) were used for diagnosis (3:1 for training and testing). The diagnostic efficiencies (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC)) of three networks were calculated in two experiment groups. Meanwhile, 552 teeth images in manual selection group were diagnosed by a radiologist. The diagnostic efficiencies of the three deep learning network models in two experiment groups and the radiologist were calculated. RESULTS: In manual selection group, ResNet50 presented highest accuracy and sensitivity for diagnosing VRF teeth. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC was 97.8%, 97.0%, 98.5%, and 0.99, the radiologist presented accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity as 95.3%, 96.4 and 94.2%. In auto-selection group, ResNet50 presented highest accuracy and sensitivity for diagnosing VRF teeth, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUC was 91.4%, 92.1%, 90.7% and 0.96. CONCLUSION: In manual selection group, ResNet50 presented higher diagnostic efficiency in diagnosis of in vivo VRF teeth than VGG19, DensenNet169 and radiologist with 2 years of experience. In auto-selection group, Resnet50 also presented higher diagnostic efficiency in diagnosis of in vivo VRF teeth than VGG19 and DensenNet169. This makes it a promising auxiliary diagnostic technique to screen for VRF teeth. BioMed Central 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9446797/ /pubmed/36064682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02422-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Ziyang
Cao, Dantong
Hu, Yanni
Wang, Baixin
Zhang, Yifan
Tang, Rong
Zhuang, Jia
Gao, Antian
Chen, Ying
Lin, Zitong
Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images
title Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images
title_full Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images
title_fullStr Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images
title_short Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images
title_sort diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam ct images
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9446797/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36064682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02422-9
work_keys_str_mv AT huziyang diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT caodantong diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT huyanni diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT wangbaixin diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT zhangyifan diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT tangrong diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT zhuangjia diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT gaoantian diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT chenying diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages
AT linzitong diagnosisofinvivoverticalrootfractureusingdeeplearningonconebeamctimages