Cargando…

Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour, which may have increased among GPs due to increasing use of telemedicine, is associated with many illnesses and increased all-cause mortality. AIM: To explore levels of sedentary behaviour among GPs and General Practice Specialty Trainees (GPSTs). DESIGN & SETTIN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayne, Richard S, Hart, Nigel D, Tully, Mark A, Wilson, Jason J, Brønd, Jan C, Heron, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0196
_version_ 1784783829280489472
author Mayne, Richard S
Hart, Nigel D
Tully, Mark A
Wilson, Jason J
Brønd, Jan C
Heron, Neil
author_facet Mayne, Richard S
Hart, Nigel D
Tully, Mark A
Wilson, Jason J
Brønd, Jan C
Heron, Neil
author_sort Mayne, Richard S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour, which may have increased among GPs due to increasing use of telemedicine, is associated with many illnesses and increased all-cause mortality. AIM: To explore levels of sedentary behaviour among GPs and General Practice Specialty Trainees (GPSTs). DESIGN & SETTING: Sequential, cross-sectional design (initial online sedentary behaviour questionnaire and subsequent thigh-worn accelerometer substudy) of GPs and GPSTs in Northern Ireland. METHOD: Self-reported questionnaire data were aggregated and compared with device-measured accelerometry data. RESULTS: Data from 353 participants (17.7% of GPs and GPSTs in Northern Ireland) revealed doctors in general practice self-reported higher workday sedentary time (10.33 hours, SD 2.97) than those in secondary care (7.9 hours, SD 3.43 [mean difference {MD} 2.43 hours; P<0.001]). An active workstation (for example, sit-stand desk), was used by 5.6% of participants in general practice, while 86.0% of those without one would consider using one in future. Active workstation users self-reported lower workday sedentary time (7.88 hours, SD 3.2) than non-users (10.47 hours, SD 2.88 [MD –2.58 hours, P = 0.001]). Accelerometer substudy participants underestimated their workday sedentary time by 0.17 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] = –1.86 to 2.20; P = 0.865), and non-workday sedentary time by 2.67 hours (95% CI = 0.99 to 4.35; P = 0.003). Most GPs (80.7%) reported increased workday sitting time compared to prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, while 87.0% would prefer less workday sitting time. CONCLUSION: GPs have high levels of workday sedentary time, which may be detrimental to their health. It is imperative to develop methods to address sedentary behaviour among GPs on workdays, both for their own health and the health of their patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9447309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Royal College of General Practitioners
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94473092022-09-19 Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study Mayne, Richard S Hart, Nigel D Tully, Mark A Wilson, Jason J Brønd, Jan C Heron, Neil BJGP Open Research BACKGROUND: Sedentary behaviour, which may have increased among GPs due to increasing use of telemedicine, is associated with many illnesses and increased all-cause mortality. AIM: To explore levels of sedentary behaviour among GPs and General Practice Specialty Trainees (GPSTs). DESIGN & SETTING: Sequential, cross-sectional design (initial online sedentary behaviour questionnaire and subsequent thigh-worn accelerometer substudy) of GPs and GPSTs in Northern Ireland. METHOD: Self-reported questionnaire data were aggregated and compared with device-measured accelerometry data. RESULTS: Data from 353 participants (17.7% of GPs and GPSTs in Northern Ireland) revealed doctors in general practice self-reported higher workday sedentary time (10.33 hours, SD 2.97) than those in secondary care (7.9 hours, SD 3.43 [mean difference {MD} 2.43 hours; P<0.001]). An active workstation (for example, sit-stand desk), was used by 5.6% of participants in general practice, while 86.0% of those without one would consider using one in future. Active workstation users self-reported lower workday sedentary time (7.88 hours, SD 3.2) than non-users (10.47 hours, SD 2.88 [MD –2.58 hours, P = 0.001]). Accelerometer substudy participants underestimated their workday sedentary time by 0.17 hours (95% confidence interval [CI] = –1.86 to 2.20; P = 0.865), and non-workday sedentary time by 2.67 hours (95% CI = 0.99 to 4.35; P = 0.003). Most GPs (80.7%) reported increased workday sitting time compared to prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, while 87.0% would prefer less workday sitting time. CONCLUSION: GPs have high levels of workday sedentary time, which may be detrimental to their health. It is imperative to develop methods to address sedentary behaviour among GPs on workdays, both for their own health and the health of their patients. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9447309/ /pubmed/34880031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0196 Text en Copyright © 2022, The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Research
Mayne, Richard S
Hart, Nigel D
Tully, Mark A
Wilson, Jason J
Brønd, Jan C
Heron, Neil
Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study
title Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study
title_full Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study
title_short Exploration of sedentary behaviour among GPs: a cross-sectional study
title_sort exploration of sedentary behaviour among gps: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34880031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2021.0196
work_keys_str_mv AT maynerichards explorationofsedentarybehaviouramonggpsacrosssectionalstudy
AT hartnigeld explorationofsedentarybehaviouramonggpsacrosssectionalstudy
AT tullymarka explorationofsedentarybehaviouramonggpsacrosssectionalstudy
AT wilsonjasonj explorationofsedentarybehaviouramonggpsacrosssectionalstudy
AT brøndjanc explorationofsedentarybehaviouramonggpsacrosssectionalstudy
AT heronneil explorationofsedentarybehaviouramonggpsacrosssectionalstudy