Cargando…

VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines

INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most preventable complication in hospitalized patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the adherence of current clinical practice to the established guidelines at a Palestinian teaching hospital. METHODS: This cross-sectional, retro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abukhalil, Abdallah Damin, Nasser, Alisse, Khader, Hadeel, Albandak, Miral, Madia, Raed, Al-Shami, Ni’meh, Naseef, Hani A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082196
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S382050
_version_ 1784783848204140544
author Abukhalil, Abdallah Damin
Nasser, Alisse
Khader, Hadeel
Albandak, Miral
Madia, Raed
Al-Shami, Ni’meh
Naseef, Hani A
author_facet Abukhalil, Abdallah Damin
Nasser, Alisse
Khader, Hadeel
Albandak, Miral
Madia, Raed
Al-Shami, Ni’meh
Naseef, Hani A
author_sort Abukhalil, Abdallah Damin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most preventable complication in hospitalized patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the adherence of current clinical practice to the established guidelines at a Palestinian teaching hospital. METHODS: This cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study was conducted at a Palestinian Teaching Hospital. The medical records of patients admitted to the medical floor over 18 years of age and hospitalized for longer than 24 hours between January 1 and May 31, 2019, were included. Patients taking anticoagulants with incomplete or duplicated medical records were excluded from the study. A data collection sheet was developed, and clotting and bleeding risks were assessed using the Padua and IMPROVE risk assessment models (scores). The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS (version 25). RESULTS: In total, 408 patients were included in the study, 222 of whom received thromboprophylaxis (54.4%). Of the hospitalized patients, 112 (27.5%) had a high risk of developing VTE (Padua score ≥ 4), and 73 patients were eligible for VTE pharmacological prophylaxis; however, only 44 (60.3%) received the appropriate prophylaxis. In addition, 296 patients had low Padua scores, indicating that pharmacological prophylaxis was not indicated. However, 144 (48.6%) patients received prophylaxis. The mean Padua and IMPROVE risk scores were 2.25 ± 2.08 and 4.44 ± 2.72, respectively. Among the patients, 17.6% had a high risk of bleeding (IMPROVE score ≥ 7). CONCLUSION: VTE prophylaxis among hospitalized medically ill patients was mostly inappropriate; 80.18% of the patients received inappropriate prophylaxis, and only 60.3% of eligible patients received appropriate prophylaxis. Adapting assessment models or checklists in clinical practice based on clinical guidelines for VTE risk stratification is a practical and effective method to improve VTE prophylaxis management and select the appropriate therapy to prevent toxicity or complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9447404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94474042022-09-07 VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines Abukhalil, Abdallah Damin Nasser, Alisse Khader, Hadeel Albandak, Miral Madia, Raed Al-Shami, Ni’meh Naseef, Hani A Vasc Health Risk Manag Original Research INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most preventable complication in hospitalized patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the adherence of current clinical practice to the established guidelines at a Palestinian teaching hospital. METHODS: This cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study was conducted at a Palestinian Teaching Hospital. The medical records of patients admitted to the medical floor over 18 years of age and hospitalized for longer than 24 hours between January 1 and May 31, 2019, were included. Patients taking anticoagulants with incomplete or duplicated medical records were excluded from the study. A data collection sheet was developed, and clotting and bleeding risks were assessed using the Padua and IMPROVE risk assessment models (scores). The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS (version 25). RESULTS: In total, 408 patients were included in the study, 222 of whom received thromboprophylaxis (54.4%). Of the hospitalized patients, 112 (27.5%) had a high risk of developing VTE (Padua score ≥ 4), and 73 patients were eligible for VTE pharmacological prophylaxis; however, only 44 (60.3%) received the appropriate prophylaxis. In addition, 296 patients had low Padua scores, indicating that pharmacological prophylaxis was not indicated. However, 144 (48.6%) patients received prophylaxis. The mean Padua and IMPROVE risk scores were 2.25 ± 2.08 and 4.44 ± 2.72, respectively. Among the patients, 17.6% had a high risk of bleeding (IMPROVE score ≥ 7). CONCLUSION: VTE prophylaxis among hospitalized medically ill patients was mostly inappropriate; 80.18% of the patients received inappropriate prophylaxis, and only 60.3% of eligible patients received appropriate prophylaxis. Adapting assessment models or checklists in clinical practice based on clinical guidelines for VTE risk stratification is a practical and effective method to improve VTE prophylaxis management and select the appropriate therapy to prevent toxicity or complication. Dove 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9447404/ /pubmed/36082196 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S382050 Text en © 2022 Abukhalil et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Abukhalil, Abdallah Damin
Nasser, Alisse
Khader, Hadeel
Albandak, Miral
Madia, Raed
Al-Shami, Ni’meh
Naseef, Hani A
VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines
title VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines
title_full VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines
title_fullStr VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines
title_short VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines
title_sort vte prophylaxis therapy: clinical practice vs clinical guidelines
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082196
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S382050
work_keys_str_mv AT abukhalilabdallahdamin vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines
AT nasseralisse vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines
AT khaderhadeel vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines
AT albandakmiral vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines
AT madiaraed vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines
AT alshaminimeh vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines
AT naseefhania vteprophylaxistherapyclinicalpracticevsclinicalguidelines