Cargando…

Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in dental care globally, in part due to the potential for contaminated aerosol to be generated by dental activities. This systematic review assesses the literature for changes in aerosol-contamination levels when rotary instruments are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-yaseen, Waraf, Jones, Rhiannon, McGregor, Scott, Wade, William, Gallagher, Jennifer, Harris, Rebecca, Johnson, Ilona, KC, Sukriti, Robertson, Mark, Innes, Nicola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4
_version_ 1784783964945252352
author Al-yaseen, Waraf
Jones, Rhiannon
McGregor, Scott
Wade, William
Gallagher, Jennifer
Harris, Rebecca
Johnson, Ilona
KC, Sukriti
Robertson, Mark
Innes, Nicola
author_facet Al-yaseen, Waraf
Jones, Rhiannon
McGregor, Scott
Wade, William
Gallagher, Jennifer
Harris, Rebecca
Johnson, Ilona
KC, Sukriti
Robertson, Mark
Innes, Nicola
author_sort Al-yaseen, Waraf
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in dental care globally, in part due to the potential for contaminated aerosol to be generated by dental activities. This systematic review assesses the literature for changes in aerosol-contamination levels when rotary instruments are used, (1) as distance increases from patient’s mouth; (2) as time passes after the procedure; and (3) when using different types of handpieces. METHODS: The review methods and reporting are in line with PRISMA statements. A structured search was conducted over five platforms (September 2021). Studies were assessed independently by two reviewers. To be eligible studies had to assess changes in levels of aerosol contamination over different distances, and time points, with rotary hand instruments. Studies’ methodologies and the sensitivity of the contamination-measurement approaches were evaluated. Results are presented descriptively. RESULTS: From 422 papers identified, 23 studies were eligible. All investigated restorative procedures using rotary instruments and one study additionally looked at orthodontic bracket adhesive material removal. The results suggest contamination is significantly reduced over time and distance. However, for almost all studies that investigated these two factors, the sizes of the contaminated particles were not considered, and there were inconclusive findings regarding whether electric-driven handpieces generate lower levels of contaminated particles. CONCLUSION: Aerosol contamination levels reduce as distances, and post-procedure times increase. However, there was sparce and inconsistent evidence on the clearing time and no conclusions could be drawn. High-speed handpieces produce significantly higher levels of contamination than slow-speed ones, and to a lesser extent, micro-motor handpieces. However, when micro-motor handpieces were used with water, the contamination levels rose and were similar to high-speed handpiece contamination levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9447949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94479492022-09-06 Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review Al-yaseen, Waraf Jones, Rhiannon McGregor, Scott Wade, William Gallagher, Jennifer Harris, Rebecca Johnson, Ilona KC, Sukriti Robertson, Mark Innes, Nicola BDJ Open Article INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in dental care globally, in part due to the potential for contaminated aerosol to be generated by dental activities. This systematic review assesses the literature for changes in aerosol-contamination levels when rotary instruments are used, (1) as distance increases from patient’s mouth; (2) as time passes after the procedure; and (3) when using different types of handpieces. METHODS: The review methods and reporting are in line with PRISMA statements. A structured search was conducted over five platforms (September 2021). Studies were assessed independently by two reviewers. To be eligible studies had to assess changes in levels of aerosol contamination over different distances, and time points, with rotary hand instruments. Studies’ methodologies and the sensitivity of the contamination-measurement approaches were evaluated. Results are presented descriptively. RESULTS: From 422 papers identified, 23 studies were eligible. All investigated restorative procedures using rotary instruments and one study additionally looked at orthodontic bracket adhesive material removal. The results suggest contamination is significantly reduced over time and distance. However, for almost all studies that investigated these two factors, the sizes of the contaminated particles were not considered, and there were inconclusive findings regarding whether electric-driven handpieces generate lower levels of contaminated particles. CONCLUSION: Aerosol contamination levels reduce as distances, and post-procedure times increase. However, there was sparce and inconsistent evidence on the clearing time and no conclusions could be drawn. High-speed handpieces produce significantly higher levels of contamination than slow-speed ones, and to a lesser extent, micro-motor handpieces. However, when micro-motor handpieces were used with water, the contamination levels rose and were similar to high-speed handpiece contamination levels. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9447949/ /pubmed/36068221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Al-yaseen, Waraf
Jones, Rhiannon
McGregor, Scott
Wade, William
Gallagher, Jennifer
Harris, Rebecca
Johnson, Ilona
KC, Sukriti
Robertson, Mark
Innes, Nicola
Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
title Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
title_full Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
title_fullStr Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
title_short Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
title_sort aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4
work_keys_str_mv AT alyaseenwaraf aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT jonesrhiannon aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT mcgregorscott aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT wadewilliam aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT gallagherjennifer aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT harrisrebecca aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT johnsonilona aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT kcsukriti aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT robertsonmark aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview
AT innesnicola aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview