Cargando…
Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in dental care globally, in part due to the potential for contaminated aerosol to be generated by dental activities. This systematic review assesses the literature for changes in aerosol-contamination levels when rotary instruments are...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4 |
_version_ | 1784783964945252352 |
---|---|
author | Al-yaseen, Waraf Jones, Rhiannon McGregor, Scott Wade, William Gallagher, Jennifer Harris, Rebecca Johnson, Ilona KC, Sukriti Robertson, Mark Innes, Nicola |
author_facet | Al-yaseen, Waraf Jones, Rhiannon McGregor, Scott Wade, William Gallagher, Jennifer Harris, Rebecca Johnson, Ilona KC, Sukriti Robertson, Mark Innes, Nicola |
author_sort | Al-yaseen, Waraf |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in dental care globally, in part due to the potential for contaminated aerosol to be generated by dental activities. This systematic review assesses the literature for changes in aerosol-contamination levels when rotary instruments are used, (1) as distance increases from patient’s mouth; (2) as time passes after the procedure; and (3) when using different types of handpieces. METHODS: The review methods and reporting are in line with PRISMA statements. A structured search was conducted over five platforms (September 2021). Studies were assessed independently by two reviewers. To be eligible studies had to assess changes in levels of aerosol contamination over different distances, and time points, with rotary hand instruments. Studies’ methodologies and the sensitivity of the contamination-measurement approaches were evaluated. Results are presented descriptively. RESULTS: From 422 papers identified, 23 studies were eligible. All investigated restorative procedures using rotary instruments and one study additionally looked at orthodontic bracket adhesive material removal. The results suggest contamination is significantly reduced over time and distance. However, for almost all studies that investigated these two factors, the sizes of the contaminated particles were not considered, and there were inconclusive findings regarding whether electric-driven handpieces generate lower levels of contaminated particles. CONCLUSION: Aerosol contamination levels reduce as distances, and post-procedure times increase. However, there was sparce and inconsistent evidence on the clearing time and no conclusions could be drawn. High-speed handpieces produce significantly higher levels of contamination than slow-speed ones, and to a lesser extent, micro-motor handpieces. However, when micro-motor handpieces were used with water, the contamination levels rose and were similar to high-speed handpiece contamination levels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9447949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94479492022-09-06 Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review Al-yaseen, Waraf Jones, Rhiannon McGregor, Scott Wade, William Gallagher, Jennifer Harris, Rebecca Johnson, Ilona KC, Sukriti Robertson, Mark Innes, Nicola BDJ Open Article INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in dental care globally, in part due to the potential for contaminated aerosol to be generated by dental activities. This systematic review assesses the literature for changes in aerosol-contamination levels when rotary instruments are used, (1) as distance increases from patient’s mouth; (2) as time passes after the procedure; and (3) when using different types of handpieces. METHODS: The review methods and reporting are in line with PRISMA statements. A structured search was conducted over five platforms (September 2021). Studies were assessed independently by two reviewers. To be eligible studies had to assess changes in levels of aerosol contamination over different distances, and time points, with rotary hand instruments. Studies’ methodologies and the sensitivity of the contamination-measurement approaches were evaluated. Results are presented descriptively. RESULTS: From 422 papers identified, 23 studies were eligible. All investigated restorative procedures using rotary instruments and one study additionally looked at orthodontic bracket adhesive material removal. The results suggest contamination is significantly reduced over time and distance. However, for almost all studies that investigated these two factors, the sizes of the contaminated particles were not considered, and there were inconclusive findings regarding whether electric-driven handpieces generate lower levels of contaminated particles. CONCLUSION: Aerosol contamination levels reduce as distances, and post-procedure times increase. However, there was sparce and inconsistent evidence on the clearing time and no conclusions could be drawn. High-speed handpieces produce significantly higher levels of contamination than slow-speed ones, and to a lesser extent, micro-motor handpieces. However, when micro-motor handpieces were used with water, the contamination levels rose and were similar to high-speed handpiece contamination levels. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9447949/ /pubmed/36068221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Al-yaseen, Waraf Jones, Rhiannon McGregor, Scott Wade, William Gallagher, Jennifer Harris, Rebecca Johnson, Ilona KC, Sukriti Robertson, Mark Innes, Nicola Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
title | Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
title_full | Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
title_short | Aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
title_sort | aerosol and splatter generation with rotary handpieces used in restorative and orthodontic dentistry: a systematic review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9447949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-022-00118-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alyaseenwaraf aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT jonesrhiannon aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT mcgregorscott aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT wadewilliam aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT gallagherjennifer aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT harrisrebecca aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT johnsonilona aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT kcsukriti aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT robertsonmark aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview AT innesnicola aerosolandsplattergenerationwithrotaryhandpiecesusedinrestorativeandorthodonticdentistryasystematicreview |