Cargando…

Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and a key immunosuppressant for improving graft survival in patients with heart transplantation (HTx). However, dose reduction or interruption is occasionally needed due to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Enteric-coa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Kina, Kim, Darae, Choi, Jin-Oh, Cho, Yang Hyun, Sung, Kiick, Oh, Jaewon, Cho, Hyun Jai, Jung, Sung-Ho, Lee, Hae-Young, Park, Jin Joo, Choi, Dong-Ju, Kang, Seok-Min, Kim, Jae-Joong, Jeon, Eun-Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.957299
_version_ 1784784029264904192
author Jeon, Kina
Kim, Darae
Choi, Jin-Oh
Cho, Yang Hyun
Sung, Kiick
Oh, Jaewon
Cho, Hyun Jai
Jung, Sung-Ho
Lee, Hae-Young
Park, Jin Joo
Choi, Dong-Ju
Kang, Seok-Min
Kim, Jae-Joong
Jeon, Eun-Seok
author_facet Jeon, Kina
Kim, Darae
Choi, Jin-Oh
Cho, Yang Hyun
Sung, Kiick
Oh, Jaewon
Cho, Hyun Jai
Jung, Sung-Ho
Lee, Hae-Young
Park, Jin Joo
Choi, Dong-Ju
Kang, Seok-Min
Kim, Jae-Joong
Jeon, Eun-Seok
author_sort Jeon, Kina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and a key immunosuppressant for improving graft survival in patients with heart transplantation (HTx). However, dose reduction or interruption is occasionally needed due to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is an alternative form of MPA delivery to improve GI tolerability. In the present study, the efficacy of EC-MPS compared with MMF in HTx patients was investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) data were used to analyze the efficacy and rejection rate of MMF and EC-MPS. A total of 611 patients was enrolled from 2014 to February of 2021. Patients were divided based on the use of MMF or EC-MPS at 6 months post-HTx. Patients who were not prescribed MMF or EC-MPS were excluded. Graft survival, all-cause mortality, and treated rejection were compared between the two groups. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS; characteristics were compared using Pearson chi-square test and survival rate with Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 510 HTx patients was analyzed (mean age: 51.74 ± 13.16 years, males: 68.2%). At 6 months after HTx, 78 patients were taking EC-MPA (12.8%) and 432 patients were taking MMF (70.7%). The median follow-up was 42.0 months (IQR: 21.7–61.0 months). Post-HTx outcomes including overall survival, all cause mortality, acute cell mediated rejection (ACR), acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR), treated rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) were comparable between the two groups during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Notable differences were not observed in overall survival, all cause mortality, ACR, AMR, treated rejection, and CAV between MMF and EC-MPS groups. Efficacy of EC-MPS was similar to that of MMF in HTx patients during mid-term follow up after HTx.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9448250
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94482502022-09-07 Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium Jeon, Kina Kim, Darae Choi, Jin-Oh Cho, Yang Hyun Sung, Kiick Oh, Jaewon Cho, Hyun Jai Jung, Sung-Ho Lee, Hae-Young Park, Jin Joo Choi, Dong-Ju Kang, Seok-Min Kim, Jae-Joong Jeon, Eun-Seok Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a prodrug of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and a key immunosuppressant for improving graft survival in patients with heart transplantation (HTx). However, dose reduction or interruption is occasionally needed due to gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is an alternative form of MPA delivery to improve GI tolerability. In the present study, the efficacy of EC-MPS compared with MMF in HTx patients was investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective study, the Korean Organ Transplant Registry (KOTRY) data were used to analyze the efficacy and rejection rate of MMF and EC-MPS. A total of 611 patients was enrolled from 2014 to February of 2021. Patients were divided based on the use of MMF or EC-MPS at 6 months post-HTx. Patients who were not prescribed MMF or EC-MPS were excluded. Graft survival, all-cause mortality, and treated rejection were compared between the two groups. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS; characteristics were compared using Pearson chi-square test and survival rate with Kaplan-Meier plot and log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 510 HTx patients was analyzed (mean age: 51.74 ± 13.16 years, males: 68.2%). At 6 months after HTx, 78 patients were taking EC-MPA (12.8%) and 432 patients were taking MMF (70.7%). The median follow-up was 42.0 months (IQR: 21.7–61.0 months). Post-HTx outcomes including overall survival, all cause mortality, acute cell mediated rejection (ACR), acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR), treated rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) were comparable between the two groups during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Notable differences were not observed in overall survival, all cause mortality, ACR, AMR, treated rejection, and CAV between MMF and EC-MPS groups. Efficacy of EC-MPS was similar to that of MMF in HTx patients during mid-term follow up after HTx. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9448250/ /pubmed/36082128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.957299 Text en Copyright © 2022 Jeon, Kim, Choi, Cho, Sung, Oh, Cho, Jung, Lee, Park, Choi, Kang, Kim and Jeon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Jeon, Kina
Kim, Darae
Choi, Jin-Oh
Cho, Yang Hyun
Sung, Kiick
Oh, Jaewon
Cho, Hyun Jai
Jung, Sung-Ho
Lee, Hae-Young
Park, Jin Joo
Choi, Dong-Ju
Kang, Seok-Min
Kim, Jae-Joong
Jeon, Eun-Seok
Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
title Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
title_full Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
title_fullStr Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
title_short Comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
title_sort comparison of mid-term clinical outcome in heart transplantation patients using mycophenolate mofetil vs. enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448250/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36082128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.957299
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonkina comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT kimdarae comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT choijinoh comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT choyanghyun comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT sungkiick comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT ohjaewon comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT chohyunjai comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT jungsungho comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT leehaeyoung comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT parkjinjoo comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT choidongju comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT kangseokmin comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT kimjaejoong comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium
AT jeoneunseok comparisonofmidtermclinicaloutcomeinhearttransplantationpatientsusingmycophenolatemofetilvsentericcoatedmycophenolatesodium