Cargando…

MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests

BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) clinicians commonly experience difficulties in referring patients to inpatient teams for hospital admission. There is limited literature reporting on patient outcomes following these complicated referrals, where ED requests for inpatient admission are rejected –...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Wendell, Wong, Lee Yung, Liu, Jasmine, Sarkar, Soham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081749
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S376419
_version_ 1784784040680751104
author Zhang, Wendell
Wong, Lee Yung
Liu, Jasmine
Sarkar, Soham
author_facet Zhang, Wendell
Wong, Lee Yung
Liu, Jasmine
Sarkar, Soham
author_sort Zhang, Wendell
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) clinicians commonly experience difficulties in referring patients to inpatient teams for hospital admission. There is limited literature reporting on patient outcomes following these complicated referrals, where ED requests for inpatient admission are rejected – which study investigators termed a “knockback”. PURPOSE: To identify disposition outcomes and referral accuracy in ED patients whose admission referral was initially rejected. Secondary objectives were to identify additional patient, clinician and systemic factors associated with knockbacks. SELECTION AND METHODOLOGY: Emergency clinicians prospectively nominated a convenience sample of patients identified as having knockbacks over two time periods (Jan–Feb 2020 and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021) at a tertiary Australian ED. Data were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach and subsequent descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were identified as knockbacks. The referrals were warranted, with 89.0% of cases (n = 97) ultimately requiring a hospital admission. In 60.6% (n = 66) of the admissions, patients were admitted under the inpatient team initially referred to by the ED, suggesting referrals were generally accurate. The number of in-hospital units involved in the admission process and ED length of stay were positively correlated (0.409, p < 0.001). Patient factors associated with knockbacks include pre-existing chronic medical conditions and presenting acutely unwell. Analysis of clinicians’ perspectives yielded recurring themes of disagreements over admission destination and diagnostic uncertainty. CONCLUSION: In this patient sample, emergency referrals for admission were mostly warranted and accurate. Knockbacks increase ED length of stay and may adversely affect patient care. Further focused discussion and clearer referral guidelines between ED clinicians and their inpatient colleagues are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9448349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94483492022-09-07 MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests Zhang, Wendell Wong, Lee Yung Liu, Jasmine Sarkar, Soham Open Access Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Emergency Department (ED) clinicians commonly experience difficulties in referring patients to inpatient teams for hospital admission. There is limited literature reporting on patient outcomes following these complicated referrals, where ED requests for inpatient admission are rejected – which study investigators termed a “knockback”. PURPOSE: To identify disposition outcomes and referral accuracy in ED patients whose admission referral was initially rejected. Secondary objectives were to identify additional patient, clinician and systemic factors associated with knockbacks. SELECTION AND METHODOLOGY: Emergency clinicians prospectively nominated a convenience sample of patients identified as having knockbacks over two time periods (Jan–Feb 2020 and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021) at a tertiary Australian ED. Data were analyzed with a mixed-methods approach and subsequent descriptive and thematic analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were identified as knockbacks. The referrals were warranted, with 89.0% of cases (n = 97) ultimately requiring a hospital admission. In 60.6% (n = 66) of the admissions, patients were admitted under the inpatient team initially referred to by the ED, suggesting referrals were generally accurate. The number of in-hospital units involved in the admission process and ED length of stay were positively correlated (0.409, p < 0.001). Patient factors associated with knockbacks include pre-existing chronic medical conditions and presenting acutely unwell. Analysis of clinicians’ perspectives yielded recurring themes of disagreements over admission destination and diagnostic uncertainty. CONCLUSION: In this patient sample, emergency referrals for admission were mostly warranted and accurate. Knockbacks increase ED length of stay and may adversely affect patient care. Further focused discussion and clearer referral guidelines between ED clinicians and their inpatient colleagues are required. Dove 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9448349/ /pubmed/36081749 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S376419 Text en © 2022 Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Wendell
Wong, Lee Yung
Liu, Jasmine
Sarkar, Soham
MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests
title MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests
title_full MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests
title_fullStr MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests
title_full_unstemmed MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests
title_short MONitoring Knockbacks in EmergencY (MONKEY) – An Audit of Disposition Outcomes in Emergency Patients with Rejected Admission Requests
title_sort monitoring knockbacks in emergency (monkey) – an audit of disposition outcomes in emergency patients with rejected admission requests
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081749
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S376419
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangwendell monitoringknockbacksinemergencymonkeyanauditofdispositionoutcomesinemergencypatientswithrejectedadmissionrequests
AT wongleeyung monitoringknockbacksinemergencymonkeyanauditofdispositionoutcomesinemergencypatientswithrejectedadmissionrequests
AT liujasmine monitoringknockbacksinemergencymonkeyanauditofdispositionoutcomesinemergencypatientswithrejectedadmissionrequests
AT sarkarsoham monitoringknockbacksinemergencymonkeyanauditofdispositionoutcomesinemergencypatientswithrejectedadmissionrequests