Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome

Background: It is important to have a rapid and cost-effective laboratory test for the early diagnosis of respiratory diseases.The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of rapid tests and PCR in patients with suspected influenza. Methods: This study was a cost-effectiveness analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbasi, Mohsen, Tvakoli, Nader, Bagheri Faradonbeh, Saeed, Bakhshayeshi, Azam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128273
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.36.36
_version_ 1784784075473551360
author Abbasi, Mohsen
Tvakoli, Nader
Bagheri Faradonbeh, Saeed
Bakhshayeshi, Azam
author_facet Abbasi, Mohsen
Tvakoli, Nader
Bagheri Faradonbeh, Saeed
Bakhshayeshi, Azam
author_sort Abbasi, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description Background: It is important to have a rapid and cost-effective laboratory test for the early diagnosis of respiratory diseases.The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of rapid tests and PCR in patients with suspected influenza. Methods: This study was a cost-effectiveness analysis from a community perspective that in which patients who were referred to the emergency department of selected hospitals of IUMS university with suspected respiratory symptoms of influenza were studied by convenience sampling method. The intervention and comparator were rapid tests and PCR respectively. effectiveness indicators in this study include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of both tests, and it examines costs from a community perspective. After drawing the decision tree model in the TreeAge software, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and to evaluate the strength of the analysis results, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses on all cost and effectiveness parameters were used. Results: According to the findings of this study, the effectiveness index in rapid test and PCR is equal to 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, and the average cost of the two tests is equal to 62.157 and 201.37$, respectively, the ICERwas 25450.27 and the cost-effectiveness threshold was estimated equal to 6000 according to the per capita GDP of the country. One-way and two-way sensitivity analysis showed that the result of cost-effectiveness analysis did not change, and the rapid test is cost-effective. Conclusion: Rapid test is less costly and effective than PCR, but the cost difference is greater than the difference in effectiveness and in terms of effectiveness indicators, both diagnostic tests are almost similar, and this cost difference has led to the choice of the rapid test as a cost-effective option. Therefore, it is recommended that physicians prioritize rapid tests in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9448497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94484972022-09-19 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome Abbasi, Mohsen Tvakoli, Nader Bagheri Faradonbeh, Saeed Bakhshayeshi, Azam Med J Islam Repub Iran Original Article Background: It is important to have a rapid and cost-effective laboratory test for the early diagnosis of respiratory diseases.The aim of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of rapid tests and PCR in patients with suspected influenza. Methods: This study was a cost-effectiveness analysis from a community perspective that in which patients who were referred to the emergency department of selected hospitals of IUMS university with suspected respiratory symptoms of influenza were studied by convenience sampling method. The intervention and comparator were rapid tests and PCR respectively. effectiveness indicators in this study include sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of both tests, and it examines costs from a community perspective. After drawing the decision tree model in the TreeAge software, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated and to evaluate the strength of the analysis results, one-way and two-way sensitivity analyses on all cost and effectiveness parameters were used. Results: According to the findings of this study, the effectiveness index in rapid test and PCR is equal to 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, and the average cost of the two tests is equal to 62.157 and 201.37$, respectively, the ICERwas 25450.27 and the cost-effectiveness threshold was estimated equal to 6000 according to the per capita GDP of the country. One-way and two-way sensitivity analysis showed that the result of cost-effectiveness analysis did not change, and the rapid test is cost-effective. Conclusion: Rapid test is less costly and effective than PCR, but the cost difference is greater than the difference in effectiveness and in terms of effectiveness indicators, both diagnostic tests are almost similar, and this cost difference has led to the choice of the rapid test as a cost-effective option. Therefore, it is recommended that physicians prioritize rapid tests in the diagnosis of respiratory diseases. Iran University of Medical Sciences 2022-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9448497/ /pubmed/36128273 http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.36.36 Text en © 2022 Iran University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-ShareAlike 1.0 License (CC BY-NC-SA 1.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abbasi, Mohsen
Tvakoli, Nader
Bagheri Faradonbeh, Saeed
Bakhshayeshi, Azam
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rapid Test Compared to Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) in Patients with Acute Respiratory Syndrome
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of rapid test compared to polymerase chain reaction (pcr) in patients with acute respiratory syndrome
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128273
http://dx.doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.36.36
work_keys_str_mv AT abbasimohsen costeffectivenessanalysisofrapidtestcomparedtopolymerasechainreactionpcrinpatientswithacuterespiratorysyndrome
AT tvakolinader costeffectivenessanalysisofrapidtestcomparedtopolymerasechainreactionpcrinpatientswithacuterespiratorysyndrome
AT bagherifaradonbehsaeed costeffectivenessanalysisofrapidtestcomparedtopolymerasechainreactionpcrinpatientswithacuterespiratorysyndrome
AT bakhshayeshiazam costeffectivenessanalysisofrapidtestcomparedtopolymerasechainreactionpcrinpatientswithacuterespiratorysyndrome