Cargando…
Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and morta...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128028 http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.37502 |
_version_ | 1784784112853188608 |
---|---|
author | Caid, Matthew Valk, Josiah Danoff, Jonathan |
author_facet | Caid, Matthew Valk, Josiah Danoff, Jonathan |
author_sort | Caid, Matthew |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and mortality. This clinical review paper will focus on some of the more commonly used irrigation solutions; povidone-iodine (PI), chlorhexidine (CHG), acetic acid (AA), hydrogen peroxide (HP), antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine (PB) SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: Significant research has been performed on the prevention of PJI, including use of intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. Several solutions have been theorized to aid in infection prevention, but no evidence-based practice guidelines in this area of orthopaedics have been established. There is a paucity of prospective randomized control trials to compare the efficacy of these joint irrigation solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a review regarding seven major categories of commonly used intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. The current literature fails to demonstrate a clear consensus for a preferred solution and concentration for povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine. Prospective, randomized control trials directly comparing these different irrigation solutions are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9448655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94486552022-09-19 Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty Caid, Matthew Valk, Josiah Danoff, Jonathan Spartan Med Res J Clinical Review INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and mortality. This clinical review paper will focus on some of the more commonly used irrigation solutions; povidone-iodine (PI), chlorhexidine (CHG), acetic acid (AA), hydrogen peroxide (HP), antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine (PB) SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: Significant research has been performed on the prevention of PJI, including use of intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. Several solutions have been theorized to aid in infection prevention, but no evidence-based practice guidelines in this area of orthopaedics have been established. There is a paucity of prospective randomized control trials to compare the efficacy of these joint irrigation solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a review regarding seven major categories of commonly used intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. The current literature fails to demonstrate a clear consensus for a preferred solution and concentration for povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine. Prospective, randomized control trials directly comparing these different irrigation solutions are needed. MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9448655/ /pubmed/36128028 http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.37502 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Review Caid, Matthew Valk, Josiah Danoff, Jonathan Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title | Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_full | Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_fullStr | Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_full_unstemmed | Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_short | Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty |
title_sort | irrigation solutions in total joint arthroplasty |
topic | Clinical Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128028 http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.37502 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caidmatthew irrigationsolutionsintotaljointarthroplasty AT valkjosiah irrigationsolutionsintotaljointarthroplasty AT danoffjonathan irrigationsolutionsintotaljointarthroplasty |