Cargando…

Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and morta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Caid, Matthew, Valk, Josiah, Danoff, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128028
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.37502
_version_ 1784784112853188608
author Caid, Matthew
Valk, Josiah
Danoff, Jonathan
author_facet Caid, Matthew
Valk, Josiah
Danoff, Jonathan
author_sort Caid, Matthew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and mortality. This clinical review paper will focus on some of the more commonly used irrigation solutions; povidone-iodine (PI), chlorhexidine (CHG), acetic acid (AA), hydrogen peroxide (HP), antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine (PB) SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: Significant research has been performed on the prevention of PJI, including use of intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. Several solutions have been theorized to aid in infection prevention, but no evidence-based practice guidelines in this area of orthopaedics have been established. There is a paucity of prospective randomized control trials to compare the efficacy of these joint irrigation solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a review regarding seven major categories of commonly used intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. The current literature fails to demonstrate a clear consensus for a preferred solution and concentration for povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine. Prospective, randomized control trials directly comparing these different irrigation solutions are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9448655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94486552022-09-19 Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty Caid, Matthew Valk, Josiah Danoff, Jonathan Spartan Med Res J Clinical Review INTRODUCTION: Despite advancements in the field of adult reconstruction, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains a common and devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty. Eradication of these infections can often prove difficult, and they remain a source of considerable morbidity and mortality. This clinical review paper will focus on some of the more commonly used irrigation solutions; povidone-iodine (PI), chlorhexidine (CHG), acetic acid (AA), hydrogen peroxide (HP), antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine (PB) SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE: Significant research has been performed on the prevention of PJI, including use of intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. Several solutions have been theorized to aid in infection prevention, but no evidence-based practice guidelines in this area of orthopaedics have been established. There is a paucity of prospective randomized control trials to compare the efficacy of these joint irrigation solutions. CONCLUSIONS: The authors present a review regarding seven major categories of commonly used intraoperative joint irrigation solutions. The current literature fails to demonstrate a clear consensus for a preferred solution and concentration for povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine, hydrogen peroxide, acetic acid, antibiotic irrigations, taurolidine, and polyhexanide-betaine. Prospective, randomized control trials directly comparing these different irrigation solutions are needed. MSU College of Osteopathic Medicine Statewide Campus System 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9448655/ /pubmed/36128028 http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.37502 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Clinical Review
Caid, Matthew
Valk, Josiah
Danoff, Jonathan
Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_full Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_short Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty
title_sort irrigation solutions in total joint arthroplasty
topic Clinical Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36128028
http://dx.doi.org/10.51894/001c.37502
work_keys_str_mv AT caidmatthew irrigationsolutionsintotaljointarthroplasty
AT valkjosiah irrigationsolutionsintotaljointarthroplasty
AT danoffjonathan irrigationsolutionsintotaljointarthroplasty