Cargando…

Rotational thromboelastometry in critically ill COVID‐19 patients does not predict thrombosis

BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID‐19 patients are in a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of thrombotic complications. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic test with the potential to reflect COVID‐19‐associated hypercoagulability and may therefore be useful to predict thromb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dujardin, Romein W. G., Garcia Rosenbaum, Gabriel, Klercq, Timo C. J., Thachil, Jecko, Nielsen, Nathan D., Juffermans, Nicole P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12798
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Critically ill COVID‐19 patients are in a hypercoagulable state with increased risk of thrombotic complications. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is a viscoelastic test with the potential to reflect COVID‐19‐associated hypercoagulability and may therefore be useful to predict thrombotic complications. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential of ROTEM profiles to predict thrombotic complications in critically ill COVID‐19 patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: Retrospective multicenter cohort study in 113 adult patients with confirmed COVID‐19 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of two large teaching hospitals in the United States and in the Netherlands. ROTEM profiles of the EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM tracings were measured within 72 h of ICU admission. Thrombotic complications encompass both arterial and venous thromboembolic complications, diagnosed with electrocardiogram, ultrasound, or computed tomography. ROTEM profiles were compared between patients with and without thrombosis. Univariable logistic regression followed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis was performed to identify ROTEM parameters associated with thrombosis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of 113 patients, 27 (23.9%) developed a thrombotic event. In the univariable analysis, EXTEM clot amplitude at 10 min (CA10) and EXTEM maximum clot formation (MCF) were associated with thrombosis with a p < 0.2 (p = 0.07 and p = 0.05, respectively). In ROC curve analysis, EXTEM CA10 had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.58 (95% CI 0.47–0.70) and EXTEM MCF had an AUC of 0.60 (95% CI 0.49–0.71). Thereby, ROTEM profiles at ICU admission did not have the potential to differentiate between patients with a high and low risk for thrombotic complications.