Cargando…

Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness

Moral injury has emerged as a topic of significant research and clinical interest over the last decade. However, much work remains to be done to comprehensively define the moral injury construct, with implications for understanding the etiology and maintenance of moral injury, its symptoms, associat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barr, Nicholas, Atuel, Hazel, Saba, Shaddy, Castro, Carl A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883338
_version_ 1784784163959734272
author Barr, Nicholas
Atuel, Hazel
Saba, Shaddy
Castro, Carl A.
author_facet Barr, Nicholas
Atuel, Hazel
Saba, Shaddy
Castro, Carl A.
author_sort Barr, Nicholas
collection PubMed
description Moral injury has emerged as a topic of significant research and clinical interest over the last decade. However, much work remains to be done to comprehensively define the moral injury construct, with implications for understanding the etiology and maintenance of moral injury, its symptoms, associations with and distinctions from traumatic illness, and treatment approaches. We provide a brief overview of the existing moral injury literature and introduce a novel dual process model (DPM) of moral injury and traumatic illness. The DPM posits an event exposure which may satisfy DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A, potential morally injurious event (PMIE) criteria, or both, followed by individual role appraisal as a perpetrator through action or inaction, a witness, a victim, or a combination of the these. Role appraisal influences symptoms and processes across biological, psychological, behavioral, social, spiritual/religious, as well as values, character, and identity domains to support a label of traumatic illness, moral injury, or both. The DPM provides a flexible analytical framework for evaluating symptoms associated with moral injury and traumatic stress and has important implications for treatment. The most thoroughly reviewed evidence-based interventions for traumatic stress hinge on exposure and habituation mechanisms to manage dysregulation of fear and memory systems, but these mechanisms often do not address core domains of moral injury identified in the DPM, including spiritual, religious, values, character, and identity domains as these exist largely outside of the putative fear network. We provide brief vignettes to illustrate the practical application of the DPM and argue that adjunct and stand-alone approaches which address values and character domains, leveraging principles of Stoicism, non-judgment of experience, acceptance, and values-oriented action, are more likely than traditional trauma treatment approaches to positively affect moral injury symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9448886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94488862022-09-08 Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness Barr, Nicholas Atuel, Hazel Saba, Shaddy Castro, Carl A. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Moral injury has emerged as a topic of significant research and clinical interest over the last decade. However, much work remains to be done to comprehensively define the moral injury construct, with implications for understanding the etiology and maintenance of moral injury, its symptoms, associations with and distinctions from traumatic illness, and treatment approaches. We provide a brief overview of the existing moral injury literature and introduce a novel dual process model (DPM) of moral injury and traumatic illness. The DPM posits an event exposure which may satisfy DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criterion A, potential morally injurious event (PMIE) criteria, or both, followed by individual role appraisal as a perpetrator through action or inaction, a witness, a victim, or a combination of the these. Role appraisal influences symptoms and processes across biological, psychological, behavioral, social, spiritual/religious, as well as values, character, and identity domains to support a label of traumatic illness, moral injury, or both. The DPM provides a flexible analytical framework for evaluating symptoms associated with moral injury and traumatic stress and has important implications for treatment. The most thoroughly reviewed evidence-based interventions for traumatic stress hinge on exposure and habituation mechanisms to manage dysregulation of fear and memory systems, but these mechanisms often do not address core domains of moral injury identified in the DPM, including spiritual, religious, values, character, and identity domains as these exist largely outside of the putative fear network. We provide brief vignettes to illustrate the practical application of the DPM and argue that adjunct and stand-alone approaches which address values and character domains, leveraging principles of Stoicism, non-judgment of experience, acceptance, and values-oriented action, are more likely than traditional trauma treatment approaches to positively affect moral injury symptoms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9448886/ /pubmed/36090367 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883338 Text en Copyright © 2022 Barr, Atuel, Saba and Castro. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Barr, Nicholas
Atuel, Hazel
Saba, Shaddy
Castro, Carl A.
Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
title Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
title_full Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
title_fullStr Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
title_full_unstemmed Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
title_short Toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
title_sort toward a dual process model of moral injury and traumatic illness
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090367
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.883338
work_keys_str_mv AT barrnicholas towardadualprocessmodelofmoralinjuryandtraumaticillness
AT atuelhazel towardadualprocessmodelofmoralinjuryandtraumaticillness
AT sabashaddy towardadualprocessmodelofmoralinjuryandtraumaticillness
AT castrocarla towardadualprocessmodelofmoralinjuryandtraumaticillness