Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan was shown to be superior to the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan in terms of reversing heart failure classification (NYHA classification), reducing N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Pei, Han, Yang, Lian, Cheng, Wu, Xinlei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.988117
_version_ 1784784175180546048
author Yang, Pei
Han, Yang
Lian, Cheng
Wu, Xinlei
author_facet Yang, Pei
Han, Yang
Lian, Cheng
Wu, Xinlei
author_sort Yang, Pei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan was shown to be superior to the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan in terms of reversing heart failure classification (NYHA classification), reducing N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level and cardiovascular mortality in many studies. Yet, the efficacy of ARNI did not come from patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We searched databases for research published from inception to July 29, 2022, that reported cardiac reverse remodeling (CRR) or security indices. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Nine studies enrolling 1,369 patients were included to perform a meta-analysis. There were 716 patients in the ARNI group and 653 in the ARB group. RESULTS: ARNI outperformed ARBs in terms of CRR indices, with striking changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (MD: 4.12%, 95%CI: 2.36, 5.88, P < 0.0001), diameter (MD: –3.40 mm, 95%CI: –4.30, –2.94, P < 0.00001, I(2) = 0%) and left atrial diameter (MD: –2.41 mm, 95%CI: –3.85, –0.97, P = 0.001, I(2) = 0%), other indices there showed no significant improvements. The incidences of major adverse cardiac events (RR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.34–0.65, P < 0.00001, I(2) = 0%), the heart failure (RR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.23–0.61, P < 0.0001, I(2) = 0%), readmission (RR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.36–0.80, P = 0.003, I(2) = 29%) in the sacubitril/valsartan group were lower than the ARB group, while the incidences of cardiac death (RR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.28, 1.09, P = 0.09), the myocardial infarction (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.77, P = 0.63), adverse side effects (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.89, 3.13, P = 0.11) showed no difference. CONCLUSION: This research indicated that early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients after AMI was superior to ARBs in reducing the risks of major adverse cardiac events, heart failure, readmission, and enhancing left ventricular EF, decreasing diameter, left atrial diameter. As for the other outcomes (the incidences of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and adverse side effects), sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated no obvious advantage over ARBs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42022307237].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9448932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94489322022-09-08 Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis Yang, Pei Han, Yang Lian, Cheng Wu, Xinlei Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: The angiotensin-receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan was shown to be superior to the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) valsartan in terms of reversing heart failure classification (NYHA classification), reducing N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level and cardiovascular mortality in many studies. Yet, the efficacy of ARNI did not come from patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We searched databases for research published from inception to July 29, 2022, that reported cardiac reverse remodeling (CRR) or security indices. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Nine studies enrolling 1,369 patients were included to perform a meta-analysis. There were 716 patients in the ARNI group and 653 in the ARB group. RESULTS: ARNI outperformed ARBs in terms of CRR indices, with striking changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (MD: 4.12%, 95%CI: 2.36, 5.88, P < 0.0001), diameter (MD: –3.40 mm, 95%CI: –4.30, –2.94, P < 0.00001, I(2) = 0%) and left atrial diameter (MD: –2.41 mm, 95%CI: –3.85, –0.97, P = 0.001, I(2) = 0%), other indices there showed no significant improvements. The incidences of major adverse cardiac events (RR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.34–0.65, P < 0.00001, I(2) = 0%), the heart failure (RR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.23–0.61, P < 0.0001, I(2) = 0%), readmission (RR: 0.54, 95%CI: 0.36–0.80, P = 0.003, I(2) = 29%) in the sacubitril/valsartan group were lower than the ARB group, while the incidences of cardiac death (RR: 0.56, 95%CI: 0.28, 1.09, P = 0.09), the myocardial infarction (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.77, P = 0.63), adverse side effects (RR: 1.67, 95% CI: 0.89, 3.13, P = 0.11) showed no difference. CONCLUSION: This research indicated that early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan in patients after AMI was superior to ARBs in reducing the risks of major adverse cardiac events, heart failure, readmission, and enhancing left ventricular EF, decreasing diameter, left atrial diameter. As for the other outcomes (the incidences of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and adverse side effects), sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated no obvious advantage over ARBs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier [CRD42022307237]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9448932/ /pubmed/36093128 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.988117 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yang, Han, Lian and Wu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Yang, Pei
Han, Yang
Lian, Cheng
Wu, Xinlei
Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs. valsartan in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9448932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093128
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.988117
work_keys_str_mv AT yangpei efficacyandsafetyofsacubitrilvalsartanvsvalsartaninpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionametaanalysis
AT hanyang efficacyandsafetyofsacubitrilvalsartanvsvalsartaninpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionametaanalysis
AT liancheng efficacyandsafetyofsacubitrilvalsartanvsvalsartaninpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionametaanalysis
AT wuxinlei efficacyandsafetyofsacubitrilvalsartanvsvalsartaninpatientswithacutemyocardialinfarctionametaanalysis