Cargando…
Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evalua...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002 |
_version_ | 1784784195738927104 |
---|---|
author | Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Duarte, Alexandre S.M. Bianchini, Walter A. Sarasty, Andrea Bravo di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda Zernotti, Mario Emilio Sartorato, Edi Lúcia Castilho, Arthur Menino |
author_facet | Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Duarte, Alexandre S.M. Bianchini, Walter A. Sarasty, Andrea Bravo di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda Zernotti, Mario Emilio Sartorato, Edi Lúcia Castilho, Arthur Menino |
author_sort | Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX™ EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9449015 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94490152022-09-09 Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Duarte, Alexandre S.M. Bianchini, Walter A. Sarasty, Andrea Bravo di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda Zernotti, Mario Emilio Sartorato, Edi Lúcia Castilho, Arthur Menino Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX™ EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach. Elsevier 2014-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9449015/ /pubmed/25649137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002 Text en © 2014 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Duarte, Alexandre S.M. Bianchini, Walter A. Sarasty, Andrea Bravo di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda Zernotti, Mario Emilio Sartorato, Edi Lúcia Castilho, Arthur Menino Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
title | Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
title_full | Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
title_fullStr | Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
title_full_unstemmed | Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
title_short | Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
title_sort | hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449015/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guimaraesalexandrecaixeta hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT decarvalhoguilhermemachado hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT duartealexandresm hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT bianchiniwaltera hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT sarastyandreabravo hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT digregoriomariafernanda hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT zernottimarioemilio hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT sartoratoedilucia hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation AT castilhoarthurmenino hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation |