Cargando…

Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()

INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta, de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado, Duarte, Alexandre S.M., Bianchini, Walter A., Sarasty, Andrea Bravo, di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda, Zernotti, Mario Emilio, Sartorato, Edi Lúcia, Castilho, Arthur Menino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002
_version_ 1784784195738927104
author Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta
de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
Duarte, Alexandre S.M.
Bianchini, Walter A.
Sarasty, Andrea Bravo
di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda
Zernotti, Mario Emilio
Sartorato, Edi Lúcia
Castilho, Arthur Menino
author_facet Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta
de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
Duarte, Alexandre S.M.
Bianchini, Walter A.
Sarasty, Andrea Bravo
di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda
Zernotti, Mario Emilio
Sartorato, Edi Lúcia
Castilho, Arthur Menino
author_sort Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX™ EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9449015
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94490152022-09-09 Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()() Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado Duarte, Alexandre S.M. Bianchini, Walter A. Sarasty, Andrea Bravo di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda Zernotti, Mario Emilio Sartorato, Edi Lúcia Castilho, Arthur Menino Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Electroacoustic stimulation is an excellent option for people with residual hearing in the low frequencies, who obtain insufficient benefit with hearing aids. To be effective, the subject's residual hearing should be preserved during cochlear implant surgery. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the hearing preservation in patients that underwent implant placement and to compare the results in accordance with the approach to the inner ear. METHODS: 19 subjects underwent a soft surgical technique, and the electrode MED-EL FLEX™ EAS, designed to be atraumatic, was used. We evaluated pre- and postoperative tonal audiometric tests with an average of 18.4 months after implantation, to measure the rate of hearing preservation. RESULTS: 17 patients had total or partial preservation of residual hearing; 5 had total hearing preservation and two individuals had no preservation of hearing. The insertion of the electrode occurred through a cochleostomy in 3 patients, and in 2 of these there was no hearing preservation; the other 16 patients experienced electrode insertion through a round window approach. All patients benefited from the cochlear implant, even those who are only using electrical stimulation. CONCLUSION: The hearing preservation occurred in 89.4% of cases. There was no significant difference between the forms of inner ear approach. Elsevier 2014-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9449015/ /pubmed/25649137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002 Text en © 2014 Associac¸ão Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Guimarães, Alexandre Caixeta
de Carvalho, Guilherme Machado
Duarte, Alexandre S.M.
Bianchini, Walter A.
Sarasty, Andrea Bravo
di Gregorio, Maria Fernanda
Zernotti, Mario Emilio
Sartorato, Edi Lúcia
Castilho, Arthur Menino
Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
title Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
title_full Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
title_fullStr Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
title_full_unstemmed Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
title_short Hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
title_sort hearing preservation and cochlear implants according to inner ear approach: multicentric evaluation()()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449015/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25649137
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2014.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT guimaraesalexandrecaixeta hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT decarvalhoguilhermemachado hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT duartealexandresm hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT bianchiniwaltera hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT sarastyandreabravo hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT digregoriomariafernanda hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT zernottimarioemilio hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT sartoratoedilucia hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation
AT castilhoarthurmenino hearingpreservationandcochlearimplantsaccordingtoinnerearapproachmulticentricevaluation