Cargando…

One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures

BACKGROUND: The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Kyung Suk, Do, Gi Cheol, Shin, Jae Bong, Kim, Min Hyung, Kim, Jun Sik, Kim, Nam Gyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068692
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2022.00164
_version_ 1784784216027824128
author Lee, Kyung Suk
Do, Gi Cheol
Shin, Jae Bong
Kim, Min Hyung
Kim, Jun Sik
Kim, Nam Gyun
author_facet Lee, Kyung Suk
Do, Gi Cheol
Shin, Jae Bong
Kim, Min Hyung
Kim, Jun Sik
Kim, Nam Gyun
author_sort Lee, Kyung Suk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures. METHODS: In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points—the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height—using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods. RESULTS: All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p<0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9449097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94490972022-09-14 One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures Lee, Kyung Suk Do, Gi Cheol Shin, Jae Bong Kim, Min Hyung Kim, Jun Sik Kim, Nam Gyun Arch Craniofac Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The treatment of zygoma complex fractures is of crucial importance in the field of plastic surgery. However, surgical methods to correct zygoma complex fractures, including the number of fixation sites, differ among operators. Although several studies have compared two-point and three-point fixation, no comparative research has yet been conducted on one-point versus two-point fixation using computed tomography scans of surgical results. Therefore, the present study aimed to address this gap in the literature by comparing surgical results between one-point and two-point fixation procedures. METHODS: In this study, we randomly selected patients to undergo surgery using one of two surgical methods. We analyzed patients with unilateral zygoma complex fractures unaccompanied by other fractures according to whether they underwent one-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress or two-point fixation of the zygomaticomaxillary buttress and the zygomaticofrontal suture. We then made measurements at three points—the zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height—using 3-month postoperative computed tomography images and performed statistical analyses to compare the results of the two methods. RESULTS: All three measurements (zygomaticofrontal suture, inferior orbital wall, and malar height) showed significant differences (p<0.05) between one-point and two-point fixation. Highly significant differences were found for the zygomaticofrontal suture and malar height parameters. The difference in the inferior wall measurements was less meaningful, even though it also reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Using three parameters in a statistical analysis of imaging findings, this study demonstrated significant differences in treatment outcomes according to the number of fixations. The results indicate that bone alignment and continuity can be achieved to a greater extent by two-point fixation instead of one-point fixation. Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association 2022-08 2022-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9449097/ /pubmed/36068692 http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2022.00164 Text en Copyright © 2022 Korean Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Kyung Suk
Do, Gi Cheol
Shin, Jae Bong
Kim, Min Hyung
Kim, Jun Sik
Kim, Nam Gyun
One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
title One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
title_full One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
title_fullStr One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
title_full_unstemmed One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
title_short One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
title_sort one-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068692
http://dx.doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2022.00164
work_keys_str_mv AT leekyungsuk onepointversustwopointfixationinthemanagementofzygomacomplexfractures
AT dogicheol onepointversustwopointfixationinthemanagementofzygomacomplexfractures
AT shinjaebong onepointversustwopointfixationinthemanagementofzygomacomplexfractures
AT kimminhyung onepointversustwopointfixationinthemanagementofzygomacomplexfractures
AT kimjunsik onepointversustwopointfixationinthemanagementofzygomacomplexfractures
AT kimnamgyun onepointversustwopointfixationinthemanagementofzygomacomplexfractures