Cargando…

Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()

INTRODUCTION: Considering the variability of results found in the clinical population using a cochlear implant, researchers in the area have been interested in the inclusion of quality of life measures to subjectively assess the benefits of the implantation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sousa, Aline Faria de, Couto, Maria Inês Vieira, Martinho-Carvalho, Ana Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28728951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.005
_version_ 1784784232073134080
author Sousa, Aline Faria de
Couto, Maria Inês Vieira
Martinho-Carvalho, Ana Claudia
author_facet Sousa, Aline Faria de
Couto, Maria Inês Vieira
Martinho-Carvalho, Ana Claudia
author_sort Sousa, Aline Faria de
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Considering the variability of results found in the clinical population using a cochlear implant, researchers in the area have been interested in the inclusion of quality of life measures to subjectively assess the benefits of the implantation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life of adult users of cochlear implant. METHODS: A cross-sectional and clinical study in a group of 26 adults of both genders, with mean duration of cochlear implant use of 6.6 years. The Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire and the generic World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire were sent electronically. RESULTS: The best assessed domain in the quality of life assessment for the cochlear implantation questionnaire was the social domain, whereas for the quality of life questionnaire it was the psychological domain. The variables, gender, time of cochlear implant use and auditory modality did not influence the results of both questionnaires. Only the variable level of education was correlated with the environment domain of the quality of life questionnaire. The variable telephone speech comprehension was associated with a better perception of quality of life for all the domains of the specific questionnaire and for the self-assessment of quality of life in general. CONCLUSION: From the users’ perspective, both questionnaires showed that cochlear implant brought benefits to different aspects related to quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9449166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94491662022-09-09 Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss() Sousa, Aline Faria de Couto, Maria Inês Vieira Martinho-Carvalho, Ana Claudia Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Considering the variability of results found in the clinical population using a cochlear implant, researchers in the area have been interested in the inclusion of quality of life measures to subjectively assess the benefits of the implantation. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life of adult users of cochlear implant. METHODS: A cross-sectional and clinical study in a group of 26 adults of both genders, with mean duration of cochlear implant use of 6.6 years. The Nijmegen Cochlear Implantation Questionnaire and the generic World Health Organization Quality of Life questionnaire were sent electronically. RESULTS: The best assessed domain in the quality of life assessment for the cochlear implantation questionnaire was the social domain, whereas for the quality of life questionnaire it was the psychological domain. The variables, gender, time of cochlear implant use and auditory modality did not influence the results of both questionnaires. Only the variable level of education was correlated with the environment domain of the quality of life questionnaire. The variable telephone speech comprehension was associated with a better perception of quality of life for all the domains of the specific questionnaire and for the self-assessment of quality of life in general. CONCLUSION: From the users’ perspective, both questionnaires showed that cochlear implant brought benefits to different aspects related to quality of life. Elsevier 2017-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9449166/ /pubmed/28728951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.005 Text en © 2017 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sousa, Aline Faria de
Couto, Maria Inês Vieira
Martinho-Carvalho, Ana Claudia
Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
title Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
title_full Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
title_fullStr Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
title_short Quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
title_sort quality of life and cochlear implant: results in adults with postlingual hearing loss()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28728951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT sousaalinefariade qualityoflifeandcochlearimplantresultsinadultswithpostlingualhearingloss
AT coutomariainesvieira qualityoflifeandcochlearimplantresultsinadultswithpostlingualhearingloss
AT martinhocarvalhoanaclaudia qualityoflifeandcochlearimplantresultsinadultswithpostlingualhearingloss