Cargando…
Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique()
INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of the tympanic membrane, termed a type one tympanoplasty is a tried and tested treatment modality. Overlay or underlay technique of tympanoplasty is common. Sandwich tympanoplasty is the combined overlay and underlay grafting of tympanic membrane. OBJECTIVE: To describ...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.03.009 |
_version_ | 1784784248790581248 |
---|---|
author | Nemade, Sanjana Vijay Shinde, Kiran Jaywant Naik, Chetana Shivadas Qadri, Haris |
author_facet | Nemade, Sanjana Vijay Shinde, Kiran Jaywant Naik, Chetana Shivadas Qadri, Haris |
author_sort | Nemade, Sanjana Vijay |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of the tympanic membrane, termed a type one tympanoplasty is a tried and tested treatment modality. Overlay or underlay technique of tympanoplasty is common. Sandwich tympanoplasty is the combined overlay and underlay grafting of tympanic membrane. OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the modified sandwich graft (mediolateral graft) tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia and areolar fascia. To compare the clinical and audiological outcome of modified sandwich tympanoplasty with underlay tympanoplasty. METHODS: A total of 88 patients of chronic otitis media were studied. 48 patients (Group A) underwent type one tympanoplasty with modified sandwich graft. Temporalis fascia was underlaid and the areolar fascia was overlaid. 48 patients (Group B) underwent type one tympanoplasty with underlay technique. We assessed the healing and hearing results. RESULTS: Successful graft take up was accomplished in 47 patients (97.9%) in Group A and in 40 patients (83.3%) Group B. The average Air-Bone gap closure achieved in Group A was 24.4 ± 1.7 dB while in Group B; it was 22.5 ± 3.5 dB. Statistically significant difference was found in graft healing rate. Difference in hearing improvement was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Double layered graft with drum-malleus as a ‘meat’ of sandwich maintains a perfect balance between sufficient stability and adequate acoustic sensitivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9449232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94492322022-09-09 Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() Nemade, Sanjana Vijay Shinde, Kiran Jaywant Naik, Chetana Shivadas Qadri, Haris Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Surgical repair of the tympanic membrane, termed a type one tympanoplasty is a tried and tested treatment modality. Overlay or underlay technique of tympanoplasty is common. Sandwich tympanoplasty is the combined overlay and underlay grafting of tympanic membrane. OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate the modified sandwich graft (mediolateral graft) tympanoplasty using temporalis fascia and areolar fascia. To compare the clinical and audiological outcome of modified sandwich tympanoplasty with underlay tympanoplasty. METHODS: A total of 88 patients of chronic otitis media were studied. 48 patients (Group A) underwent type one tympanoplasty with modified sandwich graft. Temporalis fascia was underlaid and the areolar fascia was overlaid. 48 patients (Group B) underwent type one tympanoplasty with underlay technique. We assessed the healing and hearing results. RESULTS: Successful graft take up was accomplished in 47 patients (97.9%) in Group A and in 40 patients (83.3%) Group B. The average Air-Bone gap closure achieved in Group A was 24.4 ± 1.7 dB while in Group B; it was 22.5 ± 3.5 dB. Statistically significant difference was found in graft healing rate. Difference in hearing improvement was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Double layered graft with drum-malleus as a ‘meat’ of sandwich maintains a perfect balance between sufficient stability and adequate acoustic sensitivity. Elsevier 2017-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9449232/ /pubmed/28476655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.03.009 Text en © 2017 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nemade, Sanjana Vijay Shinde, Kiran Jaywant Naik, Chetana Shivadas Qadri, Haris Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
title | Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
title_full | Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
title_fullStr | Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
title_short | Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
title_sort | comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with modified sandwich technique and underlay technique() |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28476655 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.03.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nemadesanjanavijay comparisonbetweenclinicalandaudiologicalresultsoftympanoplastywithmodifiedsandwichtechniqueandunderlaytechnique AT shindekiranjaywant comparisonbetweenclinicalandaudiologicalresultsoftympanoplastywithmodifiedsandwichtechniqueandunderlaytechnique AT naikchetanashivadas comparisonbetweenclinicalandaudiologicalresultsoftympanoplastywithmodifiedsandwichtechniqueandunderlaytechnique AT qadriharis comparisonbetweenclinicalandaudiologicalresultsoftympanoplastywithmodifiedsandwichtechniqueandunderlaytechnique |