Cargando…

Evaluation of Sequential Head Computed Tomography in Traumatic Brain Injuries

Background: The grading of the severity of head trauma plays a vital role in acute patient management and planning a case-appropriate follow-up protocol. Few studies have been published regarding the Rotterdam scoring. In this study, we have established a correlation between the Rotterdam scores, ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Sachin P, Chandrappa, Anupama, Das, Sudha K, Sen, Kamal K, Kini, Divya V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106236
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27772
Descripción
Sumario:Background: The grading of the severity of head trauma plays a vital role in acute patient management and planning a case-appropriate follow-up protocol. Few studies have been published regarding the Rotterdam scoring. In this study, we have established a correlation between the Rotterdam scores, need for sequential CTs, and the cumulative radiation dose. This correlation has helped develop a preliminary protocol that can be followed for patients hence bringing about better planned and efficient patient care. Materials and methods: From August 2014 to December 2020, 88 cases of traumatic head injury on whom a minimum of one sequential CT was performed, with no surgical intervention, were included and studied. Sequential head CTs of each patient were evaluated by skilled radiologists with a minimum experience of five years, all of whom were blinded to the findings of the initial and previous head CT findings. The serial head CTs were evaluated for the Rotterdam CT score (RCTS).  Results: Among the patients with extradural hemorrhage (EDH), only 28.6% (8) progressed over successive CTs and 75.5% (34) of patients with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) showed significant progression over sequential CTs. Maximum number of serial CTs were obtained for cases presenting with a score of 3 (34 cases) with about three of them requiring up to a total of three CTs. However, no significant change in findings was noted on serial CTs. On the contrary, significant disease progression was noted in patients with baseline scores of 4 (76.9%) and 5 (100%), with statistical significance obtained on further analysis (P = 0.001). Conclusions: We are of the opinion that there is no additional role of sequential CT for the cases with Rotterdam score of 1 or 2 in the initial CT unless there is clinical evidence of deterioration. Rotterdam score 3 needs sequential CT after 24 hours and Rotterdam scores 4 and 5 need sequential CT after 12 hours if surgical intervention is delayed. The Rotterdam score may help predict any further need for a second CT, hence decreasing the unwanted radiation exposure.