Cargando…
The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review
The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) requires more qualified professionals in these fields. However, gender segregation in higher education in this sector is creating a gender gap that means that for some disciplines female representation does not even reach 30...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300 |
_version_ | 1784784328204484608 |
---|---|
author | Verdugo-Castro, Sonia García-Holgado, Alicia Sánchez-Gómez, Mª Cruz |
author_facet | Verdugo-Castro, Sonia García-Holgado, Alicia Sánchez-Gómez, Mª Cruz |
author_sort | Verdugo-Castro, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) requires more qualified professionals in these fields. However, gender segregation in higher education in this sector is creating a gender gap that means that for some disciplines female representation does not even reach 30% of the total. In order to propose measures to address the phenomenon, it is necessary to understand the possible causes of this issue. A systematic literature review and mapping were carried out for the study, following the PRISMA guidelines and flowchart. The research questions to be answered were (RQ1) What studies exist on the gender gap in relation to the choice of higher education in the STEM field; and (RQ2) How do gender roles and stereotypes influence decision-making related to higher education? The review of peer-reviewed scientific articles, conferences texts, books and book chapters on the European education area was applied. A total of 4571 initial results were obtained and, after the process marked by the PRISMA flowchart, the final results were reduced to 26. The results revealed that gender stereotypes are strong drivers of the gender gap in general, and the Leaky Pipeline and Stereotype Threat in particular. To narrow the gender gap, it is necessary to focus on influences from the family, the educational environment, and the peer group, as well as from the culture itself. Positive self-concept, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and self-perception need to be fostered, so that the individual chooses their studies according to their goals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9449562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94495622022-09-08 The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review Verdugo-Castro, Sonia García-Holgado, Alicia Sánchez-Gómez, Mª Cruz Heliyon Review Article The development of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) requires more qualified professionals in these fields. However, gender segregation in higher education in this sector is creating a gender gap that means that for some disciplines female representation does not even reach 30% of the total. In order to propose measures to address the phenomenon, it is necessary to understand the possible causes of this issue. A systematic literature review and mapping were carried out for the study, following the PRISMA guidelines and flowchart. The research questions to be answered were (RQ1) What studies exist on the gender gap in relation to the choice of higher education in the STEM field; and (RQ2) How do gender roles and stereotypes influence decision-making related to higher education? The review of peer-reviewed scientific articles, conferences texts, books and book chapters on the European education area was applied. A total of 4571 initial results were obtained and, after the process marked by the PRISMA flowchart, the final results were reduced to 26. The results revealed that gender stereotypes are strong drivers of the gender gap in general, and the Leaky Pipeline and Stereotype Threat in particular. To narrow the gender gap, it is necessary to focus on influences from the family, the educational environment, and the peer group, as well as from the culture itself. Positive self-concept, self-efficacy, self-confidence, and self-perception need to be fostered, so that the individual chooses their studies according to their goals. Elsevier 2022-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9449562/ /pubmed/36090203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Verdugo-Castro, Sonia García-Holgado, Alicia Sánchez-Gómez, Mª Cruz The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review |
title | The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review |
title_full | The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review |
title_short | The gender gap in higher STEM studies: A systematic literature review |
title_sort | gender gap in higher stem studies: a systematic literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT verdugocastrosonia thegendergapinhigherstemstudiesasystematicliteraturereview AT garciaholgadoalicia thegendergapinhigherstemstudiesasystematicliteraturereview AT sanchezgomezmacruz thegendergapinhigherstemstudiesasystematicliteraturereview AT verdugocastrosonia gendergapinhigherstemstudiesasystematicliteraturereview AT garciaholgadoalicia gendergapinhigherstemstudiesasystematicliteraturereview AT sanchezgomezmacruz gendergapinhigherstemstudiesasystematicliteraturereview |