Cargando…

Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease

Diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In practice, GFR is typically estimated by equations based on creatinine concentration in blood, but creatinine is affected by non‐GFR factors such as age and sex. Alternative f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iversen, Esben, Boesby, Lene, Hansen, Ditte, Houlind, Morten Baltzer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1002
_version_ 1784784383123652608
author Iversen, Esben
Boesby, Lene
Hansen, Ditte
Houlind, Morten Baltzer
author_facet Iversen, Esben
Boesby, Lene
Hansen, Ditte
Houlind, Morten Baltzer
author_sort Iversen, Esben
collection PubMed
description Diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In practice, GFR is typically estimated by equations based on creatinine concentration in blood, but creatinine is affected by non‐GFR factors such as age and sex. Alternative filtration markers such as cystatin C, beta‐trace protein (BTP), and beta‐2 microglobulin (B2M) may be less dependent on age and sex, but equations combining these markers have not been investigated in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this cross‐sectional study of 50 patients with CKD stage 3–4, we compared kidney function estimates based on creatinine, cystatin C, BTP, B2M, or a combination of markers. Compared to the creatinine/cystatin C combination equation, the panel equation yielded a mean difference of only 2.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2), indicating that switching to the panel equation would be unlikely to affect management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9449817
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94498172022-09-09 Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease Iversen, Esben Boesby, Lene Hansen, Ditte Houlind, Morten Baltzer Pharmacol Res Perspect Short Report Diagnosis and management of chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires accurate assessment of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In practice, GFR is typically estimated by equations based on creatinine concentration in blood, but creatinine is affected by non‐GFR factors such as age and sex. Alternative filtration markers such as cystatin C, beta‐trace protein (BTP), and beta‐2 microglobulin (B2M) may be less dependent on age and sex, but equations combining these markers have not been investigated in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In this cross‐sectional study of 50 patients with CKD stage 3–4, we compared kidney function estimates based on creatinine, cystatin C, BTP, B2M, or a combination of markers. Compared to the creatinine/cystatin C combination equation, the panel equation yielded a mean difference of only 2.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2), indicating that switching to the panel equation would be unlikely to affect management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9449817/ /pubmed/36069238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1002 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Pharmacology Research & Perspectives published by British Pharmacological Society and American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Short Report
Iversen, Esben
Boesby, Lene
Hansen, Ditte
Houlind, Morten Baltzer
Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
title Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
title_full Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
title_fullStr Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
title_short Comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
title_sort comparison of 24‐hour urinary creatinine clearance and estimated glomerular filtration rate based on a panel of filtration markers in patients with chronic kidney disease
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449817/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36069238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/prp2.1002
work_keys_str_mv AT iversenesben comparisonof24hoururinarycreatinineclearanceandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratebasedonapaneloffiltrationmarkersinpatientswithchronickidneydisease
AT boesbylene comparisonof24hoururinarycreatinineclearanceandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratebasedonapaneloffiltrationmarkersinpatientswithchronickidneydisease
AT hansenditte comparisonof24hoururinarycreatinineclearanceandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratebasedonapaneloffiltrationmarkersinpatientswithchronickidneydisease
AT houlindmortenbaltzer comparisonof24hoururinarycreatinineclearanceandestimatedglomerularfiltrationratebasedonapaneloffiltrationmarkersinpatientswithchronickidneydisease