Cargando…

CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Updated evidence was required to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Hangcheng, Wang, Yan, Han, Yiqun, Wu, Yun, Wang, Jiayu, Xu, Binghe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.956464
_version_ 1784784390324224000
author Xu, Hangcheng
Wang, Yan
Han, Yiqun
Wu, Yun
Wang, Jiayu
Xu, Binghe
author_facet Xu, Hangcheng
Wang, Yan
Han, Yiqun
Wu, Yun
Wang, Jiayu
Xu, Binghe
author_sort Xu, Hangcheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Updated evidence was required to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted utilizing data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that contained interventions of CDK4/6 inhibitors or PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were primary outcomes of interest. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were used to assess the survival outcomes and safety profiles, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 28 RCTs with 12,129 participants were included. Pooled analysis showed that CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS than PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors (HR, 0.81; 95% CrI, 0.69–0.94), whereas no significant differences were detected regarding OS. After balancing the treatment lines and metastatic sites, the superiority of CDK4/6 inhibitors only appeared in the visceral and non-visceral subgroups. Among CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib was significantly better than others in ≥3 grade neutropenia (OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01–0.15). The incidence of stomatitis and digestive disorders was different among diverse kinds of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Discrepancies appeared regarding TRAEs of hepatotoxicity, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia among different interventions. CONCLUSIONS: CDK4/6 inhibitors showed better efficacy in PFS, but the benefits disappeared when taking treatment line into consideration. Specific and discrepant safety profiles were found in two categories of agents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022321172.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9449843
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94498432022-09-08 CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials Xu, Hangcheng Wang, Yan Han, Yiqun Wu, Yun Wang, Jiayu Xu, Binghe Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Updated evidence was required to compare the efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted utilizing data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that contained interventions of CDK4/6 inhibitors or PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were primary outcomes of interest. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were used to assess the survival outcomes and safety profiles, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 28 RCTs with 12,129 participants were included. Pooled analysis showed that CDK4/6 inhibitors significantly prolonged PFS than PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors (HR, 0.81; 95% CrI, 0.69–0.94), whereas no significant differences were detected regarding OS. After balancing the treatment lines and metastatic sites, the superiority of CDK4/6 inhibitors only appeared in the visceral and non-visceral subgroups. Among CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib was significantly better than others in ≥3 grade neutropenia (OR, 0.04; 95% CrI, 0.01–0.15). The incidence of stomatitis and digestive disorders was different among diverse kinds of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors. Discrepancies appeared regarding TRAEs of hepatotoxicity, diarrhea, and hyperglycemia among different interventions. CONCLUSIONS: CDK4/6 inhibitors showed better efficacy in PFS, but the benefits disappeared when taking treatment line into consideration. Specific and discrepant safety profiles were found in two categories of agents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022321172. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9449843/ /pubmed/36091147 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.956464 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Wang, Han, Wu, Wang and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xu, Hangcheng
Wang, Yan
Han, Yiqun
Wu, Yun
Wang, Jiayu
Xu, Binghe
CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
title CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
title_full CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
title_short CDK4/6 inhibitors versus PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
title_sort cdk4/6 inhibitors versus pi3k/akt/mtor inhibitors in women with hormone receptor-positive, her2-negative metastatic breast cancer: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis of 28 randomized controlled trials
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9449843/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091147
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.956464
work_keys_str_mv AT xuhangcheng cdk46inhibitorsversuspi3kaktmtorinhibitorsinwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativemetastaticbreastcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof28randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangyan cdk46inhibitorsversuspi3kaktmtorinhibitorsinwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativemetastaticbreastcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof28randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hanyiqun cdk46inhibitorsversuspi3kaktmtorinhibitorsinwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativemetastaticbreastcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof28randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuyun cdk46inhibitorsversuspi3kaktmtorinhibitorsinwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativemetastaticbreastcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof28randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangjiayu cdk46inhibitorsversuspi3kaktmtorinhibitorsinwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativemetastaticbreastcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof28randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xubinghe cdk46inhibitorsversuspi3kaktmtorinhibitorsinwomenwithhormonereceptorpositiveher2negativemetastaticbreastcanceranupdatedsystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisof28randomizedcontrolledtrials