Cargando…
Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated
Dogs were the first animal to become domesticated by humans, and they represent a classic model system for unraveling the processes of domestication. We compare Australian dingo eye contact and socialization with Basenji and German Shepherd dog (GSD) breeds. Australian dingoes arrived in Australia 5...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab024 |
_version_ | 1784784467748978688 |
---|---|
author | Ballard, J William O Gardner, Chloe Ellem, Lucille Yadav, Sonu Kemp, Richard I |
author_facet | Ballard, J William O Gardner, Chloe Ellem, Lucille Yadav, Sonu Kemp, Richard I |
author_sort | Ballard, J William O |
collection | PubMed |
description | Dogs were the first animal to become domesticated by humans, and they represent a classic model system for unraveling the processes of domestication. We compare Australian dingo eye contact and socialization with Basenji and German Shepherd dog (GSD) breeds. Australian dingoes arrived in Australia 5,000–8,000 BP, and there is debate whether they were domesticated before their arrival. The Basenji represents a primitive breed that diverged from the remaining breeds early in the domestication process, while GSDs are a breed dog selected from existing domestic dogs in the late 1800s. We conducted a 4-phase study with unfamiliar and familiar investigators either sitting passively or actively calling each canid. We found 75% of dingoes made eye contact in each phase. In contrast, 86% of Basenjis and 96% of GSDs made eye contact. Dingoes also exhibited shorter eye-gaze duration than breed dogs and did not respond to their name being called actively. Sociability, quantified as a canid coming within 1 m of the experimenter, was lowest for dingoes and highest for GSDs. For sociability duration, dingoes spent less time within 1 m of the experimenter than either breed dog. When compared with previous studies, these data show that the dingo is behaviorally intermediate between wild wolves and Basenji dogs and suggest that it was not domesticated before it arrived in Australia. However, it remains possible that the accumulation of mutations since colonization has obscured historical behaviors, and dingoes now exist in a feralized retamed cycle. Additional morphological and genetic data are required to resolve this conundrum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9450177 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94501772022-09-08 Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated Ballard, J William O Gardner, Chloe Ellem, Lucille Yadav, Sonu Kemp, Richard I Curr Zool Articles Dogs were the first animal to become domesticated by humans, and they represent a classic model system for unraveling the processes of domestication. We compare Australian dingo eye contact and socialization with Basenji and German Shepherd dog (GSD) breeds. Australian dingoes arrived in Australia 5,000–8,000 BP, and there is debate whether they were domesticated before their arrival. The Basenji represents a primitive breed that diverged from the remaining breeds early in the domestication process, while GSDs are a breed dog selected from existing domestic dogs in the late 1800s. We conducted a 4-phase study with unfamiliar and familiar investigators either sitting passively or actively calling each canid. We found 75% of dingoes made eye contact in each phase. In contrast, 86% of Basenjis and 96% of GSDs made eye contact. Dingoes also exhibited shorter eye-gaze duration than breed dogs and did not respond to their name being called actively. Sociability, quantified as a canid coming within 1 m of the experimenter, was lowest for dingoes and highest for GSDs. For sociability duration, dingoes spent less time within 1 m of the experimenter than either breed dog. When compared with previous studies, these data show that the dingo is behaviorally intermediate between wild wolves and Basenji dogs and suggest that it was not domesticated before it arrived in Australia. However, it remains possible that the accumulation of mutations since colonization has obscured historical behaviors, and dingoes now exist in a feralized retamed cycle. Additional morphological and genetic data are required to resolve this conundrum. Oxford University Press 2021-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9450177/ /pubmed/36090142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab024 Text en © The Author(s) (2021). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Editorial Office, Current Zoology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Articles Ballard, J William O Gardner, Chloe Ellem, Lucille Yadav, Sonu Kemp, Richard I Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated |
title | Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated |
title_full | Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated |
title_fullStr | Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated |
title_full_unstemmed | Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated |
title_short | Eye contact and sociability data suggests that Australian dingoes were never domesticated |
title_sort | eye contact and sociability data suggests that australian dingoes were never domesticated |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450177/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090142 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ballardjwilliamo eyecontactandsociabilitydatasuggeststhataustraliandingoeswereneverdomesticated AT gardnerchloe eyecontactandsociabilitydatasuggeststhataustraliandingoeswereneverdomesticated AT ellemlucille eyecontactandsociabilitydatasuggeststhataustraliandingoeswereneverdomesticated AT yadavsonu eyecontactandsociabilitydatasuggeststhataustraliandingoeswereneverdomesticated AT kemprichardi eyecontactandsociabilitydatasuggeststhataustraliandingoeswereneverdomesticated |