Cargando…

Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with multiple-level separate plates and conventional long plates by using finite element analysis. METHODS: The following four finite element models were created to simulate v...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Weibo, Tian, Ye, Wang, Hongli, Zou, Fei, Ma, Xiaosheng, Jiang, Jianyuan, Li, Ruoyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05796-7
_version_ 1784784502197846016
author Huang, Weibo
Tian, Ye
Wang, Hongli
Zou, Fei
Ma, Xiaosheng
Jiang, Jianyuan
Li, Ruoyu
author_facet Huang, Weibo
Tian, Ye
Wang, Hongli
Zou, Fei
Ma, Xiaosheng
Jiang, Jianyuan
Li, Ruoyu
author_sort Huang, Weibo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with multiple-level separate plates and conventional long plates by using finite element analysis. METHODS: The following four finite element models were created to simulate various fixations: (1) C4–6 ACDF with multiple plates, (2) C4–6 ACDF with a single plate, (3) C3–6 ACDF with multiple plates, and (4) C3–6 ACDF with a single plate. The maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation, compressive force of the adjacent intervertebral discs and range of motion (ROM) of different segments in the four models were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: For C4–6 ACDF, the maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation was lower in the multiple plate fixation model in all motion states. Similarly, for the C3–6 ACDF models, the peak stress of the C3–4 and C5–6 cages was lower with multiple plates fixation in all motions but the stress of the C4–5 cage in the multiple plates model was slightly higher in flexion, bending and rotation. Besides, applying multiple plates in C3–6 ACDF models resulted in a decreased maximum stress of the fixation under different motions except for bending. In both the C4–6 ACDF and C3–6 ACDF models, the ROM values of the adjacent motion segments were lower in the multiple plates models in extension, bending and rotation. In the C4–6 ACDF models, the peak stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs in the multiple plates models was slightly smaller. In C3–6 ACDF models, the maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs was larger in the single-plate model under flexion, bending and rotation movements. CONCLUSION: Multiple plates fixation has a positive effect on increasing stiffness and maintaining the ROM of adjacent segments, indicating lower risk of construct failure and adjacent segment degeneration. Further studies are required to confirm its efficacy in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9450340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94503402022-09-08 Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study Huang, Weibo Tian, Ye Wang, Hongli Zou, Fei Ma, Xiaosheng Jiang, Jianyuan Li, Ruoyu BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with multiple-level separate plates and conventional long plates by using finite element analysis. METHODS: The following four finite element models were created to simulate various fixations: (1) C4–6 ACDF with multiple plates, (2) C4–6 ACDF with a single plate, (3) C3–6 ACDF with multiple plates, and (4) C3–6 ACDF with a single plate. The maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation, compressive force of the adjacent intervertebral discs and range of motion (ROM) of different segments in the four models were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: For C4–6 ACDF, the maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation was lower in the multiple plate fixation model in all motion states. Similarly, for the C3–6 ACDF models, the peak stress of the C3–4 and C5–6 cages was lower with multiple plates fixation in all motions but the stress of the C4–5 cage in the multiple plates model was slightly higher in flexion, bending and rotation. Besides, applying multiple plates in C3–6 ACDF models resulted in a decreased maximum stress of the fixation under different motions except for bending. In both the C4–6 ACDF and C3–6 ACDF models, the ROM values of the adjacent motion segments were lower in the multiple plates models in extension, bending and rotation. In the C4–6 ACDF models, the peak stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs in the multiple plates models was slightly smaller. In C3–6 ACDF models, the maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs was larger in the single-plate model under flexion, bending and rotation movements. CONCLUSION: Multiple plates fixation has a positive effect on increasing stiffness and maintaining the ROM of adjacent segments, indicating lower risk of construct failure and adjacent segment degeneration. Further studies are required to confirm its efficacy in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9450340/ /pubmed/36071416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05796-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Weibo
Tian, Ye
Wang, Hongli
Zou, Fei
Ma, Xiaosheng
Jiang, Jianyuan
Li, Ruoyu
Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
title Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
title_full Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
title_short Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
title_sort comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071416
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05796-7
work_keys_str_mv AT huangweibo comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy
AT tianye comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy
AT wanghongli comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy
AT zoufei comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy
AT maxiaosheng comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy
AT jiangjianyuan comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy
AT liruoyu comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy