Cargando…
Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with multiple-level separate plates and conventional long plates by using finite element analysis. METHODS: The following four finite element models were created to simulate v...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05796-7 |
_version_ | 1784784502197846016 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Weibo Tian, Ye Wang, Hongli Zou, Fei Ma, Xiaosheng Jiang, Jianyuan Li, Ruoyu |
author_facet | Huang, Weibo Tian, Ye Wang, Hongli Zou, Fei Ma, Xiaosheng Jiang, Jianyuan Li, Ruoyu |
author_sort | Huang, Weibo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with multiple-level separate plates and conventional long plates by using finite element analysis. METHODS: The following four finite element models were created to simulate various fixations: (1) C4–6 ACDF with multiple plates, (2) C4–6 ACDF with a single plate, (3) C3–6 ACDF with multiple plates, and (4) C3–6 ACDF with a single plate. The maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation, compressive force of the adjacent intervertebral discs and range of motion (ROM) of different segments in the four models were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: For C4–6 ACDF, the maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation was lower in the multiple plate fixation model in all motion states. Similarly, for the C3–6 ACDF models, the peak stress of the C3–4 and C5–6 cages was lower with multiple plates fixation in all motions but the stress of the C4–5 cage in the multiple plates model was slightly higher in flexion, bending and rotation. Besides, applying multiple plates in C3–6 ACDF models resulted in a decreased maximum stress of the fixation under different motions except for bending. In both the C4–6 ACDF and C3–6 ACDF models, the ROM values of the adjacent motion segments were lower in the multiple plates models in extension, bending and rotation. In the C4–6 ACDF models, the peak stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs in the multiple plates models was slightly smaller. In C3–6 ACDF models, the maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs was larger in the single-plate model under flexion, bending and rotation movements. CONCLUSION: Multiple plates fixation has a positive effect on increasing stiffness and maintaining the ROM of adjacent segments, indicating lower risk of construct failure and adjacent segment degeneration. Further studies are required to confirm its efficacy in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9450340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94503402022-09-08 Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study Huang, Weibo Tian, Ye Wang, Hongli Zou, Fei Ma, Xiaosheng Jiang, Jianyuan Li, Ruoyu BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the biomechanical differences between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with multiple-level separate plates and conventional long plates by using finite element analysis. METHODS: The following four finite element models were created to simulate various fixations: (1) C4–6 ACDF with multiple plates, (2) C4–6 ACDF with a single plate, (3) C3–6 ACDF with multiple plates, and (4) C3–6 ACDF with a single plate. The maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation, compressive force of the adjacent intervertebral discs and range of motion (ROM) of different segments in the four models were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: For C4–6 ACDF, the maximum Von-mises stress of the cage and fixation was lower in the multiple plate fixation model in all motion states. Similarly, for the C3–6 ACDF models, the peak stress of the C3–4 and C5–6 cages was lower with multiple plates fixation in all motions but the stress of the C4–5 cage in the multiple plates model was slightly higher in flexion, bending and rotation. Besides, applying multiple plates in C3–6 ACDF models resulted in a decreased maximum stress of the fixation under different motions except for bending. In both the C4–6 ACDF and C3–6 ACDF models, the ROM values of the adjacent motion segments were lower in the multiple plates models in extension, bending and rotation. In the C4–6 ACDF models, the peak stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs in the multiple plates models was slightly smaller. In C3–6 ACDF models, the maximum stress on the adjacent intervertebral discs was larger in the single-plate model under flexion, bending and rotation movements. CONCLUSION: Multiple plates fixation has a positive effect on increasing stiffness and maintaining the ROM of adjacent segments, indicating lower risk of construct failure and adjacent segment degeneration. Further studies are required to confirm its efficacy in clinical practice. BioMed Central 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9450340/ /pubmed/36071416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05796-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Huang, Weibo Tian, Ye Wang, Hongli Zou, Fei Ma, Xiaosheng Jiang, Jianyuan Li, Ruoyu Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
title | Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
title_full | Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
title_short | Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071416 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05796-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangweibo comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy AT tianye comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy AT wanghongli comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy AT zoufei comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy AT maxiaosheng comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy AT jiangjianyuan comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy AT liruoyu comparativeanalysisofthebiomechanicsofanteriorcervicaldiscectomyandfusionwithmultiplesegmentalplatesfixationversussinglemultilevelplatefixationafiniteelementstudy |