Cargando…

The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees

BACKGROUND: A key component of patient-oriented research is the engagement of patients as partners in the design and conduct of health research. While there is now national infrastructure and networks to support the engagement of patients as partners, there remain calls for promising practices and s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicholls, Stuart G., Fox, Grace, Monfaredi, Zarah, Poole, Evelyn, Garritty, Chantelle, Maybee, Alies, Presseau, Justin, Shea, Beverley, Fergusson, Dean A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7
_version_ 1784784506902806528
author Nicholls, Stuart G.
Fox, Grace
Monfaredi, Zarah
Poole, Evelyn
Garritty, Chantelle
Maybee, Alies
Presseau, Justin
Shea, Beverley
Fergusson, Dean A.
author_facet Nicholls, Stuart G.
Fox, Grace
Monfaredi, Zarah
Poole, Evelyn
Garritty, Chantelle
Maybee, Alies
Presseau, Justin
Shea, Beverley
Fergusson, Dean A.
author_sort Nicholls, Stuart G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A key component of patient-oriented research is the engagement of patients as partners in the design and conduct of health research. While there is now national infrastructure and networks to support the engagement of patients as partners, there remain calls for promising practices and success stories. In particular, there remains a keen interest in evaluating the impact that patient engagement has on health research studies. We aimed to investigate the impact that patient engagement had on health research conducted in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Our sampling frame was studies that were awarded funding by the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 principal investigators, members of research teams, and patient partners. Interviews explored the role of patient partners, the perceived impact of the patient engagement on the study, challenges faced, and advice for other researchers considering patient engagement. Data were analysed using the thematic analysis method with transcripts coded independently by two members of the study team. All coding and subsequent theme generation were discussed until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: There was variation in the methods used to engage patients and other stakeholders, the roles that patients and stakeholders occupied, and where they had input. Interviewees discussed two major areas of impact of patient engagement on research: impact on the study about which they were being interviewed, which tended to relate to improved relevancy of the research to the study population, and impact on themselves which led to changes in their own practice or approaches to future research. Identified challenges to patient engagement included: identifying and reaching patient advisors or patient partners, time-related challenges, and maintaining engagement over the course of the research. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a need to further build out the concept of relevancy and how it may be operationalised in practice. Further, the longer-term impacts of patient engagement on researchers and research teams remains under-explored and may reveal additional elements for evaluation. Challenges to patient engagement remain, including identifying and maintaining engagement with partners that reflect the diversity of the population of interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9450365
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94503652022-09-08 The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees Nicholls, Stuart G. Fox, Grace Monfaredi, Zarah Poole, Evelyn Garritty, Chantelle Maybee, Alies Presseau, Justin Shea, Beverley Fergusson, Dean A. Res Involv Engagem Research BACKGROUND: A key component of patient-oriented research is the engagement of patients as partners in the design and conduct of health research. While there is now national infrastructure and networks to support the engagement of patients as partners, there remain calls for promising practices and success stories. In particular, there remains a keen interest in evaluating the impact that patient engagement has on health research studies. We aimed to investigate the impact that patient engagement had on health research conducted in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: Our sampling frame was studies that were awarded funding by the Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 principal investigators, members of research teams, and patient partners. Interviews explored the role of patient partners, the perceived impact of the patient engagement on the study, challenges faced, and advice for other researchers considering patient engagement. Data were analysed using the thematic analysis method with transcripts coded independently by two members of the study team. All coding and subsequent theme generation were discussed until consensus was achieved. RESULTS: There was variation in the methods used to engage patients and other stakeholders, the roles that patients and stakeholders occupied, and where they had input. Interviewees discussed two major areas of impact of patient engagement on research: impact on the study about which they were being interviewed, which tended to relate to improved relevancy of the research to the study population, and impact on themselves which led to changes in their own practice or approaches to future research. Identified challenges to patient engagement included: identifying and reaching patient advisors or patient partners, time-related challenges, and maintaining engagement over the course of the research. CONCLUSIONS: There remains a need to further build out the concept of relevancy and how it may be operationalised in practice. Further, the longer-term impacts of patient engagement on researchers and research teams remains under-explored and may reveal additional elements for evaluation. Challenges to patient engagement remain, including identifying and maintaining engagement with partners that reflect the diversity of the population of interest. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7. BioMed Central 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9450365/ /pubmed/36071496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Nicholls, Stuart G.
Fox, Grace
Monfaredi, Zarah
Poole, Evelyn
Garritty, Chantelle
Maybee, Alies
Presseau, Justin
Shea, Beverley
Fergusson, Dean A.
The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees
title The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees
title_full The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees
title_fullStr The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees
title_full_unstemmed The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees
title_short The impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in Ontario, Canada: An interview study with IMPACT awardees
title_sort impact of patient engagement on trials and trialists in ontario, canada: an interview study with impact awardees
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450365/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00381-7
work_keys_str_mv AT nichollsstuartg theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT foxgrace theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT monfaredizarah theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT pooleevelyn theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT garrittychantelle theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT maybeealies theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT presseaujustin theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT sheabeverley theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT fergussondeana theimpactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT nichollsstuartg impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT foxgrace impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT monfaredizarah impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT pooleevelyn impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT garrittychantelle impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT maybeealies impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT presseaujustin impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT sheabeverley impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees
AT fergussondeana impactofpatientengagementontrialsandtrialistsinontariocanadaaninterviewstudywithimpactawardees