Cargando…

Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon

BACKGROUND: Continuous vector surveillance and sustainable interventions are mandatory in order to prevent anopheline proliferation (or spread to new areas) and interrupt malaria transmission. Anopheline abundance and richness were evaluated in urban and peri-urban malaria foci at a medium-sized cit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meireles, Anne Caroline Alves, da Silva, Lucas Rosendo, Simplício, Marlon Ferreira, de Lima, Alzemar Alves, Rios, Flávia Geovana Fontineles, de Menezes, Carla Augusta, Feitoza, Luiz Henrique Maciel, Julião, Genimar Rebouças
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04274-8
_version_ 1784784508721037312
author Meireles, Anne Caroline Alves
da Silva, Lucas Rosendo
Simplício, Marlon Ferreira
de Lima, Alzemar Alves
Rios, Flávia Geovana Fontineles
de Menezes, Carla Augusta
Feitoza, Luiz Henrique Maciel
Julião, Genimar Rebouças
author_facet Meireles, Anne Caroline Alves
da Silva, Lucas Rosendo
Simplício, Marlon Ferreira
de Lima, Alzemar Alves
Rios, Flávia Geovana Fontineles
de Menezes, Carla Augusta
Feitoza, Luiz Henrique Maciel
Julião, Genimar Rebouças
author_sort Meireles, Anne Caroline Alves
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous vector surveillance and sustainable interventions are mandatory in order to prevent anopheline proliferation (or spread to new areas) and interrupt malaria transmission. Anopheline abundance and richness were evaluated in urban and peri-urban malaria foci at a medium-sized city in the Brazilian Amazon, comparing the protected human landing catch technique (PHLC) and alternative sampling methods over different seasonal periods. Additional information was assessed for female feeding behaviour and faunal composition. METHODS: Anophelines were sampled bimonthly in four urban and peri-urban sites in the city of Porto Velho, state of Rondônia, Brazil. The average number of captured mosquitoes was compared between an PHLC (gold standard), a tent trap (Gazetrap), and a barrier screen by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMM), which also included season and environment (peri-urban/urban) as predictors. RESULTS: Overall, 2962 Anopheles individuals belonging to 12 species and one complex were caught; Anopheles darlingi represented 86% of the individuals. More mosquitoes were captured in the peri-urban setting, and the urban setting was more diverse. The model estimates that significantly more anophelines were collected by PHLC than by the Screen method, and Gazetrap captured fewer individuals. However, the Screen technique yielded more blood-engorged females. The peak hours of biting activity were from 6 to 7 p.m. in urban areas and from 7 to 8 p.m. in peri-urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: Although peri-urban settings presented a greater abundance of anophelines, Shannon and Simpson diversities were higher in urban sites. Each technique proved to be useful, depending on the purpose: PHLC was more effective in capturing the highest anopheline densities, Gazetrap caught the greatest number of species, and the barrier screen technique captured more engorged individuals. There was no seasonal effect on Anopheles assemblage structure; however, a more diverse fauna was caught in the transitional season. Biting activity was more intense from 6 to 8 p.m., with a predominance of An. darlingi. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04274-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9450372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94503722022-09-08 Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon Meireles, Anne Caroline Alves da Silva, Lucas Rosendo Simplício, Marlon Ferreira de Lima, Alzemar Alves Rios, Flávia Geovana Fontineles de Menezes, Carla Augusta Feitoza, Luiz Henrique Maciel Julião, Genimar Rebouças Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Continuous vector surveillance and sustainable interventions are mandatory in order to prevent anopheline proliferation (or spread to new areas) and interrupt malaria transmission. Anopheline abundance and richness were evaluated in urban and peri-urban malaria foci at a medium-sized city in the Brazilian Amazon, comparing the protected human landing catch technique (PHLC) and alternative sampling methods over different seasonal periods. Additional information was assessed for female feeding behaviour and faunal composition. METHODS: Anophelines were sampled bimonthly in four urban and peri-urban sites in the city of Porto Velho, state of Rondônia, Brazil. The average number of captured mosquitoes was compared between an PHLC (gold standard), a tent trap (Gazetrap), and a barrier screen by means of generalized linear mixed models (GLMM), which also included season and environment (peri-urban/urban) as predictors. RESULTS: Overall, 2962 Anopheles individuals belonging to 12 species and one complex were caught; Anopheles darlingi represented 86% of the individuals. More mosquitoes were captured in the peri-urban setting, and the urban setting was more diverse. The model estimates that significantly more anophelines were collected by PHLC than by the Screen method, and Gazetrap captured fewer individuals. However, the Screen technique yielded more blood-engorged females. The peak hours of biting activity were from 6 to 7 p.m. in urban areas and from 7 to 8 p.m. in peri-urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: Although peri-urban settings presented a greater abundance of anophelines, Shannon and Simpson diversities were higher in urban sites. Each technique proved to be useful, depending on the purpose: PHLC was more effective in capturing the highest anopheline densities, Gazetrap caught the greatest number of species, and the barrier screen technique captured more engorged individuals. There was no seasonal effect on Anopheles assemblage structure; however, a more diverse fauna was caught in the transitional season. Biting activity was more intense from 6 to 8 p.m., with a predominance of An. darlingi. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-022-04274-8. BioMed Central 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9450372/ /pubmed/36068530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04274-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Meireles, Anne Caroline Alves
da Silva, Lucas Rosendo
Simplício, Marlon Ferreira
de Lima, Alzemar Alves
Rios, Flávia Geovana Fontineles
de Menezes, Carla Augusta
Feitoza, Luiz Henrique Maciel
Julião, Genimar Rebouças
Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon
title Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon
title_full Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon
title_fullStr Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon
title_short Anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the Western Brazilian Amazon
title_sort anopheline diversity in urban and peri-urban malaria foci: comparison between alternative traps and seasonal effects in a city in the western brazilian amazon
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36068530
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-022-04274-8
work_keys_str_mv AT meirelesannecarolinealves anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT dasilvalucasrosendo anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT simpliciomarlonferreira anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT delimaalzemaralves anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT riosflaviageovanafontineles anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT demenezescarlaaugusta anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT feitozaluizhenriquemaciel anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon
AT juliaogenimarreboucas anophelinediversityinurbanandperiurbanmalariafocicomparisonbetweenalternativetrapsandseasonaleffectsinacityinthewesternbrazilianamazon