Cargando…

Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow

ABSTRACT: Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and Inspiratory Peak Nasal Flow (IPNF) are used in order to objectively assess nasal patency. These are expensive not very practical tests, except for IPNF, which is a fast, simple and low cost method. OBJECTIVE: To assess IPNF in healthy individuals com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco, Zappelini, Carlos Eduardo Monteiro, Alves, Fábio Silva, da Costa, Everardo Andrade
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21860974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000400011
_version_ 1784784600445222912
author Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco
Zappelini, Carlos Eduardo Monteiro
Alves, Fábio Silva
da Costa, Everardo Andrade
author_facet Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco
Zappelini, Carlos Eduardo Monteiro
Alves, Fábio Silva
da Costa, Everardo Andrade
author_sort Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and Inspiratory Peak Nasal Flow (IPNF) are used in order to objectively assess nasal patency. These are expensive not very practical tests, except for IPNF, which is a fast, simple and low cost method. OBJECTIVE: To assess IPNF in healthy individuals complaining of nose obstruction caused by allergic rhinitis. METHOD: IPNF use in 78 individuals with and without rhinitis symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Contemporary cross-sectional cohort. RESULTS: IPNF showed significant results for nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, pruritus, sneezes and tearing (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between the presence of nasal septum deviation and IPNF (p = 0.561). We found a positive correlation between IPNF and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for nasal obstruction (p = 0.002). In the multiple linear regression model, there was a statistical significance between the values found in IPNF with allergic rhinitis and age (p = 0.005 and p = 0.023 respectively). CONCLUSION: IPNF proved to be a reliable method to detect changes in nasal patency, by obstructive causes as well as inflammatory causes, with an acceptable level of statistical significance, simple, easy to handle, inexpensive and reproducible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9450779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94507792022-09-09 Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco Zappelini, Carlos Eduardo Monteiro Alves, Fábio Silva da Costa, Everardo Andrade Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article ABSTRACT: Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and Inspiratory Peak Nasal Flow (IPNF) are used in order to objectively assess nasal patency. These are expensive not very practical tests, except for IPNF, which is a fast, simple and low cost method. OBJECTIVE: To assess IPNF in healthy individuals complaining of nose obstruction caused by allergic rhinitis. METHOD: IPNF use in 78 individuals with and without rhinitis symptoms. STUDY DESIGN: Contemporary cross-sectional cohort. RESULTS: IPNF showed significant results for nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, pruritus, sneezes and tearing (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between the presence of nasal septum deviation and IPNF (p = 0.561). We found a positive correlation between IPNF and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for nasal obstruction (p = 0.002). In the multiple linear regression model, there was a statistical significance between the values found in IPNF with allergic rhinitis and age (p = 0.005 and p = 0.023 respectively). CONCLUSION: IPNF proved to be a reliable method to detect changes in nasal patency, by obstructive causes as well as inflammatory causes, with an acceptable level of statistical significance, simple, easy to handle, inexpensive and reproducible. Elsevier 2015-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9450779/ /pubmed/21860974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000400011 Text en . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Teixeira, Rodrigo Ubiratan Franco
Zappelini, Carlos Eduardo Monteiro
Alves, Fábio Silva
da Costa, Everardo Andrade
Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
title Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
title_full Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
title_fullStr Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
title_full_unstemmed Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
title_short Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow Evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
title_sort peak nasal inspiratory flow evaluation as an objective method of measuring nasal airflow
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9450779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21860974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942011000400011
work_keys_str_mv AT teixeirarodrigoubiratanfranco peaknasalinspiratoryflowevaluationasanobjectivemethodofmeasuringnasalairflow
AT zappelinicarloseduardomonteiro peaknasalinspiratoryflowevaluationasanobjectivemethodofmeasuringnasalairflow
AT alvesfabiosilva peaknasalinspiratoryflowevaluationasanobjectivemethodofmeasuringnasalairflow
AT dacostaeverardoandrade peaknasalinspiratoryflowevaluationasanobjectivemethodofmeasuringnasalairflow