Cargando…

Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()

INTRODUCTION: Canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy is commonly used to treat advanced chronic otitis media or cholesteatoma. The advantages of canal wall down mastoidectomy are excellent exposure for disease eradication and postoperative control of residual disease; its disadvantages include the acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uluyol, Sinan, Ugur, Omer, Arslan, Ilker Burak, Yagiz, Ozlem, Gumussoy, Murat, Cukurova, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.07.007
_version_ 1784784892836446208
author Uluyol, Sinan
Ugur, Omer
Arslan, Ilker Burak
Yagiz, Ozlem
Gumussoy, Murat
Cukurova, Ibrahim
author_facet Uluyol, Sinan
Ugur, Omer
Arslan, Ilker Burak
Yagiz, Ozlem
Gumussoy, Murat
Cukurova, Ibrahim
author_sort Uluyol, Sinan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy is commonly used to treat advanced chronic otitis media or cholesteatoma. The advantages of canal wall down mastoidectomy are excellent exposure for disease eradication and postoperative control of residual disease; its disadvantages include the accumulation of debris requiring life-long otological maintenance and cleaning, continuous ear drainage, fungal cavity infections, and the occurrence of dizziness and vertigo by changing temperature or pressure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether cavity-induced problems can be eliminated and patient comfort can be increased with mastoid cavity reconstruction. METHODS: In total, 11 patients who underwent mastoid cavity reconstruction between March 2013 and June 2013 comprised the study group, and 11 patients who had dry, epithelialized CWD cavities were recruited as the control group. The study examined three parameters: epithelial migration, air caloric testing, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Epithelial migration, air caloric testing, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory were evaluated in the study and control groups. RESULTS: The epithelial migration rate was significantly faster in study group (1.63 ± 0.5 mm/week) than control group (0.94 ± 0.37 mm/week) (p = 0.003, p < 0.05). The mean slow component velocity of nystagmus of the study group (13.33 ± 5.36°/s) was significantly lower when compared to control group (32.11 ± 9.12°/s) (p = 0.018). The overall the Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was −7.21, and the general subscale, physical and social health scores were −9.71, −21.09, and +20.35, respectively in the control group. These were +33.93, +35.59, +33.31, and +29.61, respectively in the study group. All but the social health score improved significantly (0.007, 0.008, 0.018, and 0.181, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity reconstruction improves epithelial migration, normalizes caloric responses and increases the quality of life. Thus, cavity rehabilitation eliminates open-cavity-induced problems by restoring the functional anatomy of the ear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9452267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94522672022-09-09 Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy() Uluyol, Sinan Ugur, Omer Arslan, Ilker Burak Yagiz, Ozlem Gumussoy, Murat Cukurova, Ibrahim Braz J Otorhinolaryngol Original Article INTRODUCTION: Canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy is commonly used to treat advanced chronic otitis media or cholesteatoma. The advantages of canal wall down mastoidectomy are excellent exposure for disease eradication and postoperative control of residual disease; its disadvantages include the accumulation of debris requiring life-long otological maintenance and cleaning, continuous ear drainage, fungal cavity infections, and the occurrence of dizziness and vertigo by changing temperature or pressure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether cavity-induced problems can be eliminated and patient comfort can be increased with mastoid cavity reconstruction. METHODS: In total, 11 patients who underwent mastoid cavity reconstruction between March 2013 and June 2013 comprised the study group, and 11 patients who had dry, epithelialized CWD cavities were recruited as the control group. The study examined three parameters: epithelial migration, air caloric testing, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Epithelial migration, air caloric testing, and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory were evaluated in the study and control groups. RESULTS: The epithelial migration rate was significantly faster in study group (1.63 ± 0.5 mm/week) than control group (0.94 ± 0.37 mm/week) (p = 0.003, p < 0.05). The mean slow component velocity of nystagmus of the study group (13.33 ± 5.36°/s) was significantly lower when compared to control group (32.11 ± 9.12°/s) (p = 0.018). The overall the Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was −7.21, and the general subscale, physical and social health scores were −9.71, −21.09, and +20.35, respectively in the control group. These were +33.93, +35.59, +33.31, and +29.61, respectively in the study group. All but the social health score improved significantly (0.007, 0.008, 0.018, and 0.181, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cavity reconstruction improves epithelial migration, normalizes caloric responses and increases the quality of life. Thus, cavity rehabilitation eliminates open-cavity-induced problems by restoring the functional anatomy of the ear. Elsevier 2017-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9452267/ /pubmed/28867651 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.07.007 Text en © 2017 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Uluyol, Sinan
Ugur, Omer
Arslan, Ilker Burak
Yagiz, Ozlem
Gumussoy, Murat
Cukurova, Ibrahim
Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
title Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
title_full Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
title_fullStr Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
title_full_unstemmed Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
title_short Effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
title_sort effects of cavity reconstruction on morbidity and quality of life after canal wall down tympanomastoidectomy()
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28867651
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2017.07.007
work_keys_str_mv AT uluyolsinan effectsofcavityreconstructiononmorbidityandqualityoflifeaftercanalwalldowntympanomastoidectomy
AT uguromer effectsofcavityreconstructiononmorbidityandqualityoflifeaftercanalwalldowntympanomastoidectomy
AT arslanilkerburak effectsofcavityreconstructiononmorbidityandqualityoflifeaftercanalwalldowntympanomastoidectomy
AT yagizozlem effectsofcavityreconstructiononmorbidityandqualityoflifeaftercanalwalldowntympanomastoidectomy
AT gumussoymurat effectsofcavityreconstructiononmorbidityandqualityoflifeaftercanalwalldowntympanomastoidectomy
AT cukurovaibrahim effectsofcavityreconstructiononmorbidityandqualityoflifeaftercanalwalldowntympanomastoidectomy