Cargando…

Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery after 1 year using the elastic index (EI) and volume. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study of 41 patients, with lymphedema, who underwent LVA surgery between July 2018 and June 2020. Limb circumference, used to dete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jayoung, Kim, Soojin, Woo, Kyongje, Bae, Hasuk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071002
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.22063
_version_ 1784784898735734784
author Lee, Jayoung
Kim, Soojin
Woo, Kyongje
Bae, Hasuk
author_facet Lee, Jayoung
Kim, Soojin
Woo, Kyongje
Bae, Hasuk
author_sort Lee, Jayoung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery after 1 year using the elastic index (EI) and volume. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study of 41 patients, with lymphedema, who underwent LVA surgery between July 2018 and June 2020. Limb circumference, used to determine the volume of the limb with lymphedema, and EI, which reflects tissue stiffness and measured using ultrasonography were measured for each patient before and 1 year after LVA surgery. To examine the effect of LVA, differences in the preoperative and 1-year postoperative volumes and EIs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean volume and EI of the dominant site in upper-extremity lymphedema were 2,309.4 cm(3) and 1.4, respectively, preoperatively and 2,237.1 cm(3) and 0.9, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. The mean volume and EI difference of the dominant site 1 year after surgery was −16.6 cm(3) (p=0.22) and −0.5 (p<0.001). The mean volume and EI of dominant site in lower-extremity lymphedema were 6,137.0 cm(3) and 1.2, respectively, preoperatively, and 5,832.6 cm(3) and 1.1, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. The mean volume and EI difference of the dominant site 1 year postoperatively were −320.9 cm(3) (p=0.04) and −0.2 (p=0.09), respectively. CONCLUSION: LVA surgery is more effective in reducing pressure than in reducing volume, which may be helpful in preventing the progression of lymphedema.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9452291
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94522912022-09-14 Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective Lee, Jayoung Kim, Soojin Woo, Kyongje Bae, Hasuk Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effects of lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery after 1 year using the elastic index (EI) and volume. METHODS: This study was a retrospective study of 41 patients, with lymphedema, who underwent LVA surgery between July 2018 and June 2020. Limb circumference, used to determine the volume of the limb with lymphedema, and EI, which reflects tissue stiffness and measured using ultrasonography were measured for each patient before and 1 year after LVA surgery. To examine the effect of LVA, differences in the preoperative and 1-year postoperative volumes and EIs were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The mean volume and EI of the dominant site in upper-extremity lymphedema were 2,309.4 cm(3) and 1.4, respectively, preoperatively and 2,237.1 cm(3) and 0.9, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. The mean volume and EI difference of the dominant site 1 year after surgery was −16.6 cm(3) (p=0.22) and −0.5 (p<0.001). The mean volume and EI of dominant site in lower-extremity lymphedema were 6,137.0 cm(3) and 1.2, respectively, preoperatively, and 5,832.6 cm(3) and 1.1, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively. The mean volume and EI difference of the dominant site 1 year postoperatively were −320.9 cm(3) (p=0.04) and −0.2 (p=0.09), respectively. CONCLUSION: LVA surgery is more effective in reducing pressure than in reducing volume, which may be helpful in preventing the progression of lymphedema. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2022-08 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9452291/ /pubmed/36071002 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.22063 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jayoung
Kim, Soojin
Woo, Kyongje
Bae, Hasuk
Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective
title Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective
title_full Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective
title_fullStr Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective
title_short Effects of Lymphovenous Anastomosis Surgery Using Ultrasonography in Lymphedema From a Pressure Perspective
title_sort effects of lymphovenous anastomosis surgery using ultrasonography in lymphedema from a pressure perspective
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452291/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071002
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.22063
work_keys_str_mv AT leejayoung effectsoflymphovenousanastomosissurgeryusingultrasonographyinlymphedemafromapressureperspective
AT kimsoojin effectsoflymphovenousanastomosissurgeryusingultrasonographyinlymphedemafromapressureperspective
AT wookyongje effectsoflymphovenousanastomosissurgeryusingultrasonographyinlymphedemafromapressureperspective
AT baehasuk effectsoflymphovenousanastomosissurgeryusingultrasonographyinlymphedemafromapressureperspective