Cargando…
Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
OBJECTIVES: Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9 |
_version_ | 1784784947438944256 |
---|---|
author | Fradet, Guillaume Ayde, Reina Bottois, Hugo El Harchaoui, Mohamed Khaled, Wassef Drapé, Jean-Luc Pilleul, Frank Bouhamama, Amine Beuf, Olivier Leporq, Benjamin |
author_facet | Fradet, Guillaume Ayde, Reina Bottois, Hugo El Harchaoui, Mohamed Khaled, Wassef Drapé, Jean-Luc Pilleul, Frank Bouhamama, Amine Beuf, Olivier Leporq, Benjamin |
author_sort | Fradet, Guillaume |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. METHODS: Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. RESULTS: The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 ± 0.11 (95% CI 0.65−1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 ± 0.12 (95% CI 0.59−1) and 0.99 ± 0.02 (95% CI 0.95−1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9452614 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94526142022-09-09 Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning Fradet, Guillaume Ayde, Reina Bottois, Hugo El Harchaoui, Mohamed Khaled, Wassef Drapé, Jean-Luc Pilleul, Frank Bouhamama, Amine Beuf, Olivier Leporq, Benjamin Eur Radiol Exp Original Article OBJECTIVES: Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. METHODS: Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. RESULTS: The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 ± 0.11 (95% CI 0.65−1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 ± 0.12 (95% CI 0.59−1) and 0.99 ± 0.02 (95% CI 0.95−1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9. Springer Vienna 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9452614/ /pubmed/36071368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fradet, Guillaume Ayde, Reina Bottois, Hugo El Harchaoui, Mohamed Khaled, Wassef Drapé, Jean-Luc Pilleul, Frank Bouhamama, Amine Beuf, Olivier Leporq, Benjamin Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
title | Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
title_full | Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
title_fullStr | Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
title_short | Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
title_sort | prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on mri: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452614/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fradetguillaume predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT aydereina predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT bottoishugo predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT elharchaouimohamed predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT khaledwassef predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT drapejeanluc predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT pilleulfrank predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT bouhamamaamine predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT beufolivier predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning AT leporqbenjamin predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning |