Cargando…

Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning

OBJECTIVES: Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fradet, Guillaume, Ayde, Reina, Bottois, Hugo, El Harchaoui, Mohamed, Khaled, Wassef, Drapé, Jean-Luc, Pilleul, Frank, Bouhamama, Amine, Beuf, Olivier, Leporq, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9
_version_ 1784784947438944256
author Fradet, Guillaume
Ayde, Reina
Bottois, Hugo
El Harchaoui, Mohamed
Khaled, Wassef
Drapé, Jean-Luc
Pilleul, Frank
Bouhamama, Amine
Beuf, Olivier
Leporq, Benjamin
author_facet Fradet, Guillaume
Ayde, Reina
Bottois, Hugo
El Harchaoui, Mohamed
Khaled, Wassef
Drapé, Jean-Luc
Pilleul, Frank
Bouhamama, Amine
Beuf, Olivier
Leporq, Benjamin
author_sort Fradet, Guillaume
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. METHODS: Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. RESULTS: The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 ± 0.11 (95% CI 0.65−1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 ± 0.12 (95% CI 0.59−1) and 0.99 ± 0.02 (95% CI 0.95−1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9452614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Vienna
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94526142022-09-09 Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning Fradet, Guillaume Ayde, Reina Bottois, Hugo El Harchaoui, Mohamed Khaled, Wassef Drapé, Jean-Luc Pilleul, Frank Bouhamama, Amine Beuf, Olivier Leporq, Benjamin Eur Radiol Exp Original Article OBJECTIVES: Malignancy of lipomatous soft-tissue tumours diagnosis is suspected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and requires a biopsy. The aim of this study is to compare the performances of MRI radiomic machine learning (ML) analysis with deep learning (DL) to predict malignancy in patients with lipomas oratypical lipomatous tumours. METHODS: Cohort include 145 patients affected by lipomatous soft tissue tumours with histology and fat-suppressed gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI pulse sequence. Images were collected between 2010 and 2019 over 78 centres with non-uniform protocols (three different magnetic field strengths (1.0, 1.5 and 3.0 T) on 16 MR systems commercialised by four vendors (General Electric, Siemens, Philips, Toshiba)). Two approaches have been compared: (i) ML from radiomic features with and without batch correction; and (ii) DL from images. Performances were assessed using 10 cross-validation folds from a test set and next in external validation data. RESULTS: The best DL model was obtained using ResNet50 (resulting into an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 ± 0.11 (95% CI 0.65−1). For ML/radiomics, performances reached AUCs equal to 0.83 ± 0.12 (95% CI 0.59−1) and 0.99 ± 0.02 (95% CI 0.95−1) on test cohort using gradient boosting without and with batch effect correction, respectively. On the external cohort, the AUC of the gradient boosting model was equal to 0.80 and for an optimised decision threshold sensitivity and specificity were equal to 100% and 32% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this context of limited observations, batch-effect corrected ML/radiomics approaches outperformed DL-based models. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9. Springer Vienna 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9452614/ /pubmed/36071368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Fradet, Guillaume
Ayde, Reina
Bottois, Hugo
El Harchaoui, Mohamed
Khaled, Wassef
Drapé, Jean-Luc
Pilleul, Frank
Bouhamama, Amine
Beuf, Olivier
Leporq, Benjamin
Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
title Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
title_full Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
title_fullStr Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
title_short Prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on MRI: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
title_sort prediction of lipomatous soft tissue malignancy on mri: comparison between machine learning applied to radiomics and deep learning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36071368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00295-9
work_keys_str_mv AT fradetguillaume predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT aydereina predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT bottoishugo predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT elharchaouimohamed predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT khaledwassef predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT drapejeanluc predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT pilleulfrank predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT bouhamamaamine predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT beufolivier predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning
AT leporqbenjamin predictionoflipomatoussofttissuemalignancyonmricomparisonbetweenmachinelearningappliedtoradiomicsanddeeplearning