Cargando…

Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence

The vast majority of women who experience physical intimate partner violence (IPV) will likely suffer a brain injury (BI) as a result of the abuse. Accurate screening of IPV–BI can ensure survivors have access to appropriate health care and other supports, but screening results may also impact them...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boyle, Quinn, Illes, Judy, Simonetto, Deana, van Donkelaar, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac023
_version_ 1784784963856498688
author Boyle, Quinn
Illes, Judy
Simonetto, Deana
van Donkelaar, Paul
author_facet Boyle, Quinn
Illes, Judy
Simonetto, Deana
van Donkelaar, Paul
author_sort Boyle, Quinn
collection PubMed
description The vast majority of women who experience physical intimate partner violence (IPV) will likely suffer a brain injury (BI) as a result of the abuse. Accurate screening of IPV–BI can ensure survivors have access to appropriate health care and other supports, but screening results may also impact them receiving fair and equitable treatment in the legal system, and the justice they deserve. We used semi-structured interviews, combined with a contrastive vignette that described a realistic but hypothetical scenario involving IPV with or without BI, to explore the impact of BI on parenting disputes. Participants were lawyers (n = 12) whose focus is family law. Results highlight the potential adverse consequences of a positive BI screen that are influenced by the legal responsibility of counsel, the legal aid status of the woman, ongoing family dynamics, and the expectations of society while the focus on the best interests of the child is retained. Taken together, the findings reflect the legal vulnerability of women in decision-making about their capacity to parent after a BI. We conclude with recommendations for the future of IPV–BI screening aimed at mitigating risk and equipping women to navigate a legal system that has disadvantaged them, both historically and in the current context.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9452684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94526842022-09-08 Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence Boyle, Quinn Illes, Judy Simonetto, Deana van Donkelaar, Paul J Law Biosci Original Article The vast majority of women who experience physical intimate partner violence (IPV) will likely suffer a brain injury (BI) as a result of the abuse. Accurate screening of IPV–BI can ensure survivors have access to appropriate health care and other supports, but screening results may also impact them receiving fair and equitable treatment in the legal system, and the justice they deserve. We used semi-structured interviews, combined with a contrastive vignette that described a realistic but hypothetical scenario involving IPV with or without BI, to explore the impact of BI on parenting disputes. Participants were lawyers (n = 12) whose focus is family law. Results highlight the potential adverse consequences of a positive BI screen that are influenced by the legal responsibility of counsel, the legal aid status of the woman, ongoing family dynamics, and the expectations of society while the focus on the best interests of the child is retained. Taken together, the findings reflect the legal vulnerability of women in decision-making about their capacity to parent after a BI. We conclude with recommendations for the future of IPV–BI screening aimed at mitigating risk and equipping women to navigate a legal system that has disadvantaged them, both historically and in the current context. Oxford University Press 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9452684/ /pubmed/36092774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac023 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Boyle, Quinn
Illes, Judy
Simonetto, Deana
van Donkelaar, Paul
Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
title Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
title_full Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
title_fullStr Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
title_full_unstemmed Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
title_short Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
title_sort ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac023
work_keys_str_mv AT boylequinn ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence
AT illesjudy ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence
AT simonettodeana ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence
AT vandonkelaarpaul ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence