Cargando…
Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence
The vast majority of women who experience physical intimate partner violence (IPV) will likely suffer a brain injury (BI) as a result of the abuse. Accurate screening of IPV–BI can ensure survivors have access to appropriate health care and other supports, but screening results may also impact them...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac023 |
_version_ | 1784784963856498688 |
---|---|
author | Boyle, Quinn Illes, Judy Simonetto, Deana van Donkelaar, Paul |
author_facet | Boyle, Quinn Illes, Judy Simonetto, Deana van Donkelaar, Paul |
author_sort | Boyle, Quinn |
collection | PubMed |
description | The vast majority of women who experience physical intimate partner violence (IPV) will likely suffer a brain injury (BI) as a result of the abuse. Accurate screening of IPV–BI can ensure survivors have access to appropriate health care and other supports, but screening results may also impact them receiving fair and equitable treatment in the legal system, and the justice they deserve. We used semi-structured interviews, combined with a contrastive vignette that described a realistic but hypothetical scenario involving IPV with or without BI, to explore the impact of BI on parenting disputes. Participants were lawyers (n = 12) whose focus is family law. Results highlight the potential adverse consequences of a positive BI screen that are influenced by the legal responsibility of counsel, the legal aid status of the woman, ongoing family dynamics, and the expectations of society while the focus on the best interests of the child is retained. Taken together, the findings reflect the legal vulnerability of women in decision-making about their capacity to parent after a BI. We conclude with recommendations for the future of IPV–BI screening aimed at mitigating risk and equipping women to navigate a legal system that has disadvantaged them, both historically and in the current context. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9452684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94526842022-09-08 Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence Boyle, Quinn Illes, Judy Simonetto, Deana van Donkelaar, Paul J Law Biosci Original Article The vast majority of women who experience physical intimate partner violence (IPV) will likely suffer a brain injury (BI) as a result of the abuse. Accurate screening of IPV–BI can ensure survivors have access to appropriate health care and other supports, but screening results may also impact them receiving fair and equitable treatment in the legal system, and the justice they deserve. We used semi-structured interviews, combined with a contrastive vignette that described a realistic but hypothetical scenario involving IPV with or without BI, to explore the impact of BI on parenting disputes. Participants were lawyers (n = 12) whose focus is family law. Results highlight the potential adverse consequences of a positive BI screen that are influenced by the legal responsibility of counsel, the legal aid status of the woman, ongoing family dynamics, and the expectations of society while the focus on the best interests of the child is retained. Taken together, the findings reflect the legal vulnerability of women in decision-making about their capacity to parent after a BI. We conclude with recommendations for the future of IPV–BI screening aimed at mitigating risk and equipping women to navigate a legal system that has disadvantaged them, both historically and in the current context. Oxford University Press 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9452684/ /pubmed/36092774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac023 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Boyle, Quinn Illes, Judy Simonetto, Deana van Donkelaar, Paul Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
title | Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
title_full | Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
title_fullStr | Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
title_short | Ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
title_sort | ethicolegal considerations of screening for brain injury in women who have experienced intimate partner violence |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boylequinn ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence AT illesjudy ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence AT simonettodeana ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence AT vandonkelaarpaul ethicolegalconsiderationsofscreeningforbraininjuryinwomenwhohaveexperiencedintimatepartnerviolence |