Cargando…
Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease
BACKGROUND: Sit-To-Stand (STS) tests are reported as feasible alternatives for the assessment of functional fitness but the reliability of these tests in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been reported. This study explored the test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups vali...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093135 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.841453 |
_version_ | 1784784978094063616 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Zheng Yan, Jianhua Meng, Shu Li, Jiajia Yu, Yi Zhang, Tingting Tsang, Raymond C. C. El-Ansary, Doa Han, Jia Jones, Alice Y. M. |
author_facet | Wang, Zheng Yan, Jianhua Meng, Shu Li, Jiajia Yu, Yi Zhang, Tingting Tsang, Raymond C. C. El-Ansary, Doa Han, Jia Jones, Alice Y. M. |
author_sort | Wang, Zheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sit-To-Stand (STS) tests are reported as feasible alternatives for the assessment of functional fitness but the reliability of these tests in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been reported. This study explored the test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity of the five times, 30-sec and 1-min sit-to-stand test (FTSTS test, 30-s STS test and 1-min STS test respectively) in patients with CAD. The feasibility of applying these tests to distinguish the level of risk for cardiovascular events in CAD patients was also investigated. METHODS: Patients with stable CAD performed a 6MWT and 3 STS tests in random order on the same day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted using STS test data to differentiate patients with low or high risk of cardiovascular events based on the risk level determined by distance covered in the 6MWT as > or ≤ 419 m. Thirty patients repeated the 3 STS tests on the following day. RESULTS: 112 subjects with diagnoses of atherosclerosis or post-percutaneous coronary intervention, or post-acute myocardial infarction (post-AMI) participated in the validity analysis. All 3 STS tests demonstrated moderate and significant correlation with the 6MWT (coefficient values r for the FTSTS, 30-s STS and 1-min STS tests were−0.53, 0.57 and 0.55 respectively). Correlations between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and all STS tests and between 6MWT and LVEF were only weak (r values ranged from 0.27 to 0.31). Subgroup analysis showed participants in the post-AMI group performed worse in all tests compared to non-myocardial infarction (non-MI) group. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.80 for FTSTS (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 73.8%, optimal cut-off: >11.7 sec), and the AUC, sensitivity, specificity and optimal cut-off for 30-s STS and 1-min STS test were 0.83, 75.0%, 76.2%, ≤ 12 repetitions and 0.80, 71.4%, 73.8%, ≤ 23 repetitions respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for repeated measurements of the FTSTS, 30-s STS and 1-min STS tests were 0.96, 0.95 and 0.96 respectively, with the minimal detectable change (MDC(95)) computed to be 1.1 sec 1.8 repetitions and 3.9 repetitions respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All STS tests demonstrated good test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity. STS tests may discriminate low from high levels of risk for a cardiovascular event in patients with CAD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9452740 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94527402022-09-09 Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease Wang, Zheng Yan, Jianhua Meng, Shu Li, Jiajia Yu, Yi Zhang, Tingting Tsang, Raymond C. C. El-Ansary, Doa Han, Jia Jones, Alice Y. M. Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Sit-To-Stand (STS) tests are reported as feasible alternatives for the assessment of functional fitness but the reliability of these tests in people with coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been reported. This study explored the test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity of the five times, 30-sec and 1-min sit-to-stand test (FTSTS test, 30-s STS test and 1-min STS test respectively) in patients with CAD. The feasibility of applying these tests to distinguish the level of risk for cardiovascular events in CAD patients was also investigated. METHODS: Patients with stable CAD performed a 6MWT and 3 STS tests in random order on the same day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted using STS test data to differentiate patients with low or high risk of cardiovascular events based on the risk level determined by distance covered in the 6MWT as > or ≤ 419 m. Thirty patients repeated the 3 STS tests on the following day. RESULTS: 112 subjects with diagnoses of atherosclerosis or post-percutaneous coronary intervention, or post-acute myocardial infarction (post-AMI) participated in the validity analysis. All 3 STS tests demonstrated moderate and significant correlation with the 6MWT (coefficient values r for the FTSTS, 30-s STS and 1-min STS tests were−0.53, 0.57 and 0.55 respectively). Correlations between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and all STS tests and between 6MWT and LVEF were only weak (r values ranged from 0.27 to 0.31). Subgroup analysis showed participants in the post-AMI group performed worse in all tests compared to non-myocardial infarction (non-MI) group. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.80 for FTSTS (sensitivity: 75.0%, specificity: 73.8%, optimal cut-off: >11.7 sec), and the AUC, sensitivity, specificity and optimal cut-off for 30-s STS and 1-min STS test were 0.83, 75.0%, 76.2%, ≤ 12 repetitions and 0.80, 71.4%, 73.8%, ≤ 23 repetitions respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for repeated measurements of the FTSTS, 30-s STS and 1-min STS tests were 0.96, 0.95 and 0.96 respectively, with the minimal detectable change (MDC(95)) computed to be 1.1 sec 1.8 repetitions and 3.9 repetitions respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All STS tests demonstrated good test-retest reliability, convergent and known-groups validity. STS tests may discriminate low from high levels of risk for a cardiovascular event in patients with CAD. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9452740/ /pubmed/36093135 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.841453 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Yan, Meng, Li, Yu, Zhang, Tsang, El-Ansary, Han and Jones. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Wang, Zheng Yan, Jianhua Meng, Shu Li, Jiajia Yu, Yi Zhang, Tingting Tsang, Raymond C. C. El-Ansary, Doa Han, Jia Jones, Alice Y. M. Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
title | Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
title_full | Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
title_fullStr | Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
title_short | Reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
title_sort | reliability and validity of sit-to-stand test protocols in patients with coronary artery disease |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452740/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093135 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.841453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangzheng reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT yanjianhua reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT mengshu reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT lijiajia reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT yuyi reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT zhangtingting reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT tsangraymondcc reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT elansarydoa reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT hanjia reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease AT jonesaliceym reliabilityandvalidityofsittostandtestprotocolsinpatientswithcoronaryarterydisease |