Cargando…

Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones

Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Renjie, Liu, Jialin, Li, Huizhen, Zeng, Qingteng, Wu, Shenfeng, Tian, Hengyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.949452
_version_ 1784785003568168960
author Zhang, Renjie
Liu, Jialin
Li, Huizhen
Zeng, Qingteng
Wu, Shenfeng
Tian, Hengyu
author_facet Zhang, Renjie
Liu, Jialin
Li, Huizhen
Zeng, Qingteng
Wu, Shenfeng
Tian, Hengyu
author_sort Zhang, Renjie
collection PubMed
description Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therapeutic efficacy and safety of ERCP and LTCBDE approaches were retrospectively compared. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical economics was performed to analyze and evaluate the two approaches. Results: There was no significant difference in the success rate of surgery and bile stone residue between ERCP and LTCBDE group. The incidence of postoperative complications in ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group; while the incidence of pancreatitis in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in biliary infection, bile leakage and sepsis between ERCP and LTCBDE groups. In terms of cost, the costs of surgery and nursing were significantly lower, the costs of treatment and sanitary materials were significantly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in the costs of medical examination, laboratory test, medicine cost and total cost between ERCP group and LTCBDE group. The total length of hospital stay, length of hospital stay before surgery and duration of surgery in the ERCP group were significantly lower than that in the LTCBDE group; there was no significant difference in length of hospital stay after surgery between the ERCP and LTCBDE group. The cost-effectiveness ratio of ERCP group was 34171.25, and the cost-effectiveness of LTCBDE group was 34524.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two groups was 51415. Conclusion: ERCP and LTCBDE approaches had similar therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of CBDS. The safety of LTCBDE approach is superior to that of ERCP approach for the treatment of CBDS. ERCP approach is more economical in the treatment of CBDS than LTCBDE approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9452837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94528372022-09-09 Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones Zhang, Renjie Liu, Jialin Li, Huizhen Zeng, Qingteng Wu, Shenfeng Tian, Hengyu Front Physiol Physiology Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therapeutic efficacy and safety of ERCP and LTCBDE approaches were retrospectively compared. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical economics was performed to analyze and evaluate the two approaches. Results: There was no significant difference in the success rate of surgery and bile stone residue between ERCP and LTCBDE group. The incidence of postoperative complications in ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group; while the incidence of pancreatitis in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in biliary infection, bile leakage and sepsis between ERCP and LTCBDE groups. In terms of cost, the costs of surgery and nursing were significantly lower, the costs of treatment and sanitary materials were significantly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in the costs of medical examination, laboratory test, medicine cost and total cost between ERCP group and LTCBDE group. The total length of hospital stay, length of hospital stay before surgery and duration of surgery in the ERCP group were significantly lower than that in the LTCBDE group; there was no significant difference in length of hospital stay after surgery between the ERCP and LTCBDE group. The cost-effectiveness ratio of ERCP group was 34171.25, and the cost-effectiveness of LTCBDE group was 34524.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two groups was 51415. Conclusion: ERCP and LTCBDE approaches had similar therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of CBDS. The safety of LTCBDE approach is superior to that of ERCP approach for the treatment of CBDS. ERCP approach is more economical in the treatment of CBDS than LTCBDE approach. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9452837/ /pubmed/36091409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.949452 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Liu, Li, Zeng, Wu and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Zhang, Renjie
Liu, Jialin
Li, Huizhen
Zeng, Qingteng
Wu, Shenfeng
Tian, Hengyu
Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
title Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
title_full Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
title_fullStr Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
title_short Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
title_sort evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ercp and ltcbde in the treatment of common bile duct stones
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091409
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.949452
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangrenjie evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones
AT liujialin evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones
AT lihuizhen evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones
AT zengqingteng evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones
AT wushenfeng evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones
AT tianhengyu evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones