Cargando…
Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones
Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.949452 |
_version_ | 1784785003568168960 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Renjie Liu, Jialin Li, Huizhen Zeng, Qingteng Wu, Shenfeng Tian, Hengyu |
author_facet | Zhang, Renjie Liu, Jialin Li, Huizhen Zeng, Qingteng Wu, Shenfeng Tian, Hengyu |
author_sort | Zhang, Renjie |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therapeutic efficacy and safety of ERCP and LTCBDE approaches were retrospectively compared. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical economics was performed to analyze and evaluate the two approaches. Results: There was no significant difference in the success rate of surgery and bile stone residue between ERCP and LTCBDE group. The incidence of postoperative complications in ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group; while the incidence of pancreatitis in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in biliary infection, bile leakage and sepsis between ERCP and LTCBDE groups. In terms of cost, the costs of surgery and nursing were significantly lower, the costs of treatment and sanitary materials were significantly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in the costs of medical examination, laboratory test, medicine cost and total cost between ERCP group and LTCBDE group. The total length of hospital stay, length of hospital stay before surgery and duration of surgery in the ERCP group were significantly lower than that in the LTCBDE group; there was no significant difference in length of hospital stay after surgery between the ERCP and LTCBDE group. The cost-effectiveness ratio of ERCP group was 34171.25, and the cost-effectiveness of LTCBDE group was 34524.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two groups was 51415. Conclusion: ERCP and LTCBDE approaches had similar therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of CBDS. The safety of LTCBDE approach is superior to that of ERCP approach for the treatment of CBDS. ERCP approach is more economical in the treatment of CBDS than LTCBDE approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9452837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94528372022-09-09 Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones Zhang, Renjie Liu, Jialin Li, Huizhen Zeng, Qingteng Wu, Shenfeng Tian, Hengyu Front Physiol Physiology Objectives: This study further compared the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE) approaches in the treatment of common bile duct stones (CBDS) from the perspective of efficacy, safety and economy. Methods: The therapeutic efficacy and safety of ERCP and LTCBDE approaches were retrospectively compared. Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinical economics was performed to analyze and evaluate the two approaches. Results: There was no significant difference in the success rate of surgery and bile stone residue between ERCP and LTCBDE group. The incidence of postoperative complications in ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group; while the incidence of pancreatitis in the ERCP group was significantly higher than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in biliary infection, bile leakage and sepsis between ERCP and LTCBDE groups. In terms of cost, the costs of surgery and nursing were significantly lower, the costs of treatment and sanitary materials were significantly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LTCBDE group. There was no significant difference in the costs of medical examination, laboratory test, medicine cost and total cost between ERCP group and LTCBDE group. The total length of hospital stay, length of hospital stay before surgery and duration of surgery in the ERCP group were significantly lower than that in the LTCBDE group; there was no significant difference in length of hospital stay after surgery between the ERCP and LTCBDE group. The cost-effectiveness ratio of ERCP group was 34171.25, and the cost-effectiveness of LTCBDE group was 34524.25. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the two groups was 51415. Conclusion: ERCP and LTCBDE approaches had similar therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of CBDS. The safety of LTCBDE approach is superior to that of ERCP approach for the treatment of CBDS. ERCP approach is more economical in the treatment of CBDS than LTCBDE approach. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9452837/ /pubmed/36091409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.949452 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Liu, Li, Zeng, Wu and Tian. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Zhang, Renjie Liu, Jialin Li, Huizhen Zeng, Qingteng Wu, Shenfeng Tian, Hengyu Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
title | Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
title_full | Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
title_short | Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ERCP and LTCBDE in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
title_sort | evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, safety and economy of ercp and ltcbde in the treatment of common bile duct stones |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9452837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091409 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.949452 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangrenjie evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones AT liujialin evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones AT lihuizhen evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones AT zengqingteng evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones AT wushenfeng evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones AT tianhengyu evaluationoftherapeuticefficacysafetyandeconomyofercpandltcbdeinthetreatmentofcommonbileductstones |