Cargando…
Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
BACKGROUND: The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of dist...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007 |
_version_ | 1784785059762405376 |
---|---|
author | Deora, Surender Sharma, Shubham Kumar Choudhary, Rahul Kaushik, Atul Garg, Pawan Kumar Khera, Pushpinder Singh Singh, Kuldeep Shah, Sanjay Patel, Tejas M. |
author_facet | Deora, Surender Sharma, Shubham Kumar Choudhary, Rahul Kaushik, Atul Garg, Pawan Kumar Khera, Pushpinder Singh Singh, Kuldeep Shah, Sanjay Patel, Tejas M. |
author_sort | Deora, Surender |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of distal radial artery. METHODS: Total of 1004 patients of >18 years of age undergoing coronary catheterization were included in the study. The vessel diameter was measured from media to media in the anatomical snuff box a day prior to coronary catheterization. RESULTS: The mean diameter of right radial artery at conventional access site was 2.56 ± 0.35 mm and at distal access site 2.23 ± 0.39 mm (p < 0.001). Females had significantly smaller radial artery diameter as compared to males at right conventional access site (2.42 ± 0.36 mm vs 2.60 ± 0.34 mm; p < 0.001) and distal access site (2.09 ± 0.38 mm vs 2.27 ± 0.39 mm; p < 0.001). The diameter of the right dRA was not significantly correlated with age (r(2) linear = 0.002, p = 0.0475) but was positively correlated with height and weight (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = <0.001 and r(2) linear = 0.005, p = <0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the size of right dRA 2.27 + 0.39 mm in males and 2.09 + 0.38 mm in females. Diabetes, hypertension, height and weight are important predictors of dRA diameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9453060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94530602022-09-09 Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization Deora, Surender Sharma, Shubham Kumar Choudhary, Rahul Kaushik, Atul Garg, Pawan Kumar Khera, Pushpinder Singh Singh, Kuldeep Shah, Sanjay Patel, Tejas M. Indian Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of distal radial artery. METHODS: Total of 1004 patients of >18 years of age undergoing coronary catheterization were included in the study. The vessel diameter was measured from media to media in the anatomical snuff box a day prior to coronary catheterization. RESULTS: The mean diameter of right radial artery at conventional access site was 2.56 ± 0.35 mm and at distal access site 2.23 ± 0.39 mm (p < 0.001). Females had significantly smaller radial artery diameter as compared to males at right conventional access site (2.42 ± 0.36 mm vs 2.60 ± 0.34 mm; p < 0.001) and distal access site (2.09 ± 0.38 mm vs 2.27 ± 0.39 mm; p < 0.001). The diameter of the right dRA was not significantly correlated with age (r(2) linear = 0.002, p = 0.0475) but was positively correlated with height and weight (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = <0.001 and r(2) linear = 0.005, p = <0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the size of right dRA 2.27 + 0.39 mm in males and 2.09 + 0.38 mm in females. Diabetes, hypertension, height and weight are important predictors of dRA diameter. Elsevier 2022 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9453060/ /pubmed/35728657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007 Text en © 2022 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Deora, Surender Sharma, Shubham Kumar Choudhary, Rahul Kaushik, Atul Garg, Pawan Kumar Khera, Pushpinder Singh Singh, Kuldeep Shah, Sanjay Patel, Tejas M. Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
title | Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
title_full | Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
title_fullStr | Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
title_short | Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
title_sort | assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deorasurender assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT sharmashubhamkumar assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT choudharyrahul assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT kaushikatul assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT gargpawankumar assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT kherapushpindersingh assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT singhkuldeep assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT shahsanjay assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization AT pateltejasm assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization |