Cargando…

Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization

BACKGROUND: The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of dist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deora, Surender, Sharma, Shubham Kumar, Choudhary, Rahul, Kaushik, Atul, Garg, Pawan Kumar, Khera, Pushpinder Singh, Singh, Kuldeep, Shah, Sanjay, Patel, Tejas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007
_version_ 1784785059762405376
author Deora, Surender
Sharma, Shubham Kumar
Choudhary, Rahul
Kaushik, Atul
Garg, Pawan Kumar
Khera, Pushpinder Singh
Singh, Kuldeep
Shah, Sanjay
Patel, Tejas M.
author_facet Deora, Surender
Sharma, Shubham Kumar
Choudhary, Rahul
Kaushik, Atul
Garg, Pawan Kumar
Khera, Pushpinder Singh
Singh, Kuldeep
Shah, Sanjay
Patel, Tejas M.
author_sort Deora, Surender
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of distal radial artery. METHODS: Total of 1004 patients of >18 years of age undergoing coronary catheterization were included in the study. The vessel diameter was measured from media to media in the anatomical snuff box a day prior to coronary catheterization. RESULTS: The mean diameter of right radial artery at conventional access site was 2.56 ± 0.35 mm and at distal access site 2.23 ± 0.39 mm (p < 0.001). Females had significantly smaller radial artery diameter as compared to males at right conventional access site (2.42 ± 0.36 mm vs 2.60 ± 0.34 mm; p < 0.001) and distal access site (2.09 ± 0.38 mm vs 2.27 ± 0.39 mm; p < 0.001). The diameter of the right dRA was not significantly correlated with age (r(2) linear = 0.002, p = 0.0475) but was positively correlated with height and weight (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = <0.001 and r(2) linear = 0.005, p = <0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the size of right dRA 2.27 + 0.39 mm in males and 2.09 + 0.38 mm in females. Diabetes, hypertension, height and weight are important predictors of dRA diameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9453060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94530602022-09-09 Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization Deora, Surender Sharma, Shubham Kumar Choudhary, Rahul Kaushik, Atul Garg, Pawan Kumar Khera, Pushpinder Singh Singh, Kuldeep Shah, Sanjay Patel, Tejas M. Indian Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of distal radial artery. METHODS: Total of 1004 patients of >18 years of age undergoing coronary catheterization were included in the study. The vessel diameter was measured from media to media in the anatomical snuff box a day prior to coronary catheterization. RESULTS: The mean diameter of right radial artery at conventional access site was 2.56 ± 0.35 mm and at distal access site 2.23 ± 0.39 mm (p < 0.001). Females had significantly smaller radial artery diameter as compared to males at right conventional access site (2.42 ± 0.36 mm vs 2.60 ± 0.34 mm; p < 0.001) and distal access site (2.09 ± 0.38 mm vs 2.27 ± 0.39 mm; p < 0.001). The diameter of the right dRA was not significantly correlated with age (r(2) linear = 0.002, p = 0.0475) but was positively correlated with height and weight (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = <0.001 and r(2) linear = 0.005, p = <0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI (r(2) linear = 0.076, p = 0.519). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown the size of right dRA 2.27 + 0.39 mm in males and 2.09 + 0.38 mm in females. Diabetes, hypertension, height and weight are important predictors of dRA diameter. Elsevier 2022 2022-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9453060/ /pubmed/35728657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007 Text en © 2022 Cardiological Society of India. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India, Pvt. Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Deora, Surender
Sharma, Shubham Kumar
Choudhary, Rahul
Kaushik, Atul
Garg, Pawan Kumar
Khera, Pushpinder Singh
Singh, Kuldeep
Shah, Sanjay
Patel, Tejas M.
Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
title Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
title_full Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
title_fullStr Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
title_full_unstemmed Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
title_short Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
title_sort assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35728657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007
work_keys_str_mv AT deorasurender assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT sharmashubhamkumar assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT choudharyrahul assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT kaushikatul assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT gargpawankumar assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT kherapushpindersingh assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT singhkuldeep assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT shahsanjay assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization
AT pateltejasm assessmentandcomparisonofdistalradialarterydiameterinanatomicalsnuffboxwithconventionalradialarterybeforecoronarycatheterization