Cargando…

Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block

AIM: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Atalı, Onur, Özçelik, Elif, Gönül, Onur, Garip, Hasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4206275
_version_ 1784785065989898240
author Atalı, Onur
Özçelik, Elif
Gönül, Onur
Garip, Hasan
author_facet Atalı, Onur
Özçelik, Elif
Gönül, Onur
Garip, Hasan
author_sort Atalı, Onur
collection PubMed
description AIM: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculotemporal nerve block (ANB) and Gow-Gates (GG) mandibular anesthesia techniques on patient comfort in an arthrocentesis procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed this study on 40 patients who underwent TMJ arthrocentesis with ANB (n = 20) or GG (n = 20) mandibular anesthesia techniques at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between 2016 and 2019. The predictor variable was the type of an anesthesia technique, and the outcome variables included were pain, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and protrusive movement (PM). They were compared at the preoperative period and 3(rd) and 6(th) month periods. Statistical analysis included means with standard deviations, a one-way ANOVA for continuous data, and the results were evaluated at the significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the VAS values, MMO, and PM averages of preoperative, 3(rd) and 6(th) months of ANB and GG (p=0.142, p=0.209, and p=0.148). CONCLUSION: Both anesthesia techniques have provided effective results in terms of pain and functional jaw movements in the postoperative period in arthrocentesis treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9453085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94530852022-09-09 Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block Atalı, Onur Özçelik, Elif Gönül, Onur Garip, Hasan Pain Res Manag Research Article AIM: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are clinical situations that are characterized by pain, sound, and irregular movements of the temporomandibular joints. The most common method in the treatment of TMDs is arthrocentesis. This study aims to compare the effect of conventional extraoral auriculotemporal nerve block (ANB) and Gow-Gates (GG) mandibular anesthesia techniques on patient comfort in an arthrocentesis procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed this study on 40 patients who underwent TMJ arthrocentesis with ANB (n = 20) or GG (n = 20) mandibular anesthesia techniques at the Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry between 2016 and 2019. The predictor variable was the type of an anesthesia technique, and the outcome variables included were pain, maximum mouth opening (MMO), and protrusive movement (PM). They were compared at the preoperative period and 3(rd) and 6(th) month periods. Statistical analysis included means with standard deviations, a one-way ANOVA for continuous data, and the results were evaluated at the significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the VAS values, MMO, and PM averages of preoperative, 3(rd) and 6(th) months of ANB and GG (p=0.142, p=0.209, and p=0.148). CONCLUSION: Both anesthesia techniques have provided effective results in terms of pain and functional jaw movements in the postoperative period in arthrocentesis treatment. Hindawi 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9453085/ /pubmed/36090766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4206275 Text en Copyright © 2022 Onur Atalı et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Atalı, Onur
Özçelik, Elif
Gönül, Onur
Garip, Hasan
Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
title Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
title_full Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
title_fullStr Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
title_short Evaluation of Patient Comfort and Impact of Different Anesthesia Techniques on the Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis Applications by Comparing Gow-Gates Mandibular Block Anesthesia with Auriculotemporal Nerve Block
title_sort evaluation of patient comfort and impact of different anesthesia techniques on the temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis applications by comparing gow-gates mandibular block anesthesia with auriculotemporal nerve block
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/4206275
work_keys_str_mv AT atalıonur evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock
AT ozcelikelif evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock
AT gonulonur evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock
AT gariphasan evaluationofpatientcomfortandimpactofdifferentanesthesiatechniquesonthetemporomandibularjointarthrocentesisapplicationsbycomparinggowgatesmandibularblockanesthesiawithauriculotemporalnerveblock