Cargando…

Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care

BACKGROUND: In South Africa (SA), approximately 16 000 stillbirths occur annually. Most are classified as unexplained and occur in district hospitals. Many of these deaths may be caused by undetected foetal growth restriction. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery (CWDU-UmA) is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hlongwane, Tsakane M., Botha, Tanita, Nkosi, Bongani S., Pattinson, Robert C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36073106
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v64i1.5487
_version_ 1784785075659866112
author Hlongwane, Tsakane M.
Botha, Tanita
Nkosi, Bongani S.
Pattinson, Robert C.
author_facet Hlongwane, Tsakane M.
Botha, Tanita
Nkosi, Bongani S.
Pattinson, Robert C.
author_sort Hlongwane, Tsakane M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In South Africa (SA), approximately 16 000 stillbirths occur annually. Most are classified as unexplained and occur in district hospitals. Many of these deaths may be caused by undetected foetal growth restriction. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery (CWDU-UmA) is a simple method for assessing placental function. This screening method may detect the foetus at risk of dying and growth-restricted foetuses, allowing for appropriate management. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted across South Africa. Pregnant women attending primary health care clinics at 28–34 weeks gestation were screened using CWDU-UmA. Women not screened at those antenatal clinics served as control group 1. Control group 2 consisted of the subset of control group 1 with women detected with antenatal complications excluded. Women with foetuses identified with an abnormal CWDU-UmA test were referred and managed according to a standardised protocol. A comparison between the study and control groups was performed. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 6536 pregnancies, and there were 66 stillbirths (stillbirth rate [SBR]: 10.1/1000 births). In control group 1, there were 193 stillbirths in 10 832 women (SBR: 17.8/1000 births), and in control group 2, 152 stillbirths in 9811 women (SBR: 15.5/1000 births) (risk ratio: 0.57, 95% confidence intervals: 0.29–0.85 and 0.65, 0.36–0.94, respectively). CONCLUSION: Screening a low-risk pregnant population identified the low-risk mother with a high-risk foetus, and acting on the information as described was associated with a significant reduction (35% – 43%) in stillbirths. This demonstrates a step-change reduction in stillbirths and warrants screening in SA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9453129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94531292022-09-09 Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care Hlongwane, Tsakane M. Botha, Tanita Nkosi, Bongani S. Pattinson, Robert C. S Afr Fam Pract (2004) Original Research BACKGROUND: In South Africa (SA), approximately 16 000 stillbirths occur annually. Most are classified as unexplained and occur in district hospitals. Many of these deaths may be caused by undetected foetal growth restriction. Continuous wave Doppler ultrasound of the umbilical artery (CWDU-UmA) is a simple method for assessing placental function. This screening method may detect the foetus at risk of dying and growth-restricted foetuses, allowing for appropriate management. METHODS: A cohort study was conducted across South Africa. Pregnant women attending primary health care clinics at 28–34 weeks gestation were screened using CWDU-UmA. Women not screened at those antenatal clinics served as control group 1. Control group 2 consisted of the subset of control group 1 with women detected with antenatal complications excluded. Women with foetuses identified with an abnormal CWDU-UmA test were referred and managed according to a standardised protocol. A comparison between the study and control groups was performed. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 6536 pregnancies, and there were 66 stillbirths (stillbirth rate [SBR]: 10.1/1000 births). In control group 1, there were 193 stillbirths in 10 832 women (SBR: 17.8/1000 births), and in control group 2, 152 stillbirths in 9811 women (SBR: 15.5/1000 births) (risk ratio: 0.57, 95% confidence intervals: 0.29–0.85 and 0.65, 0.36–0.94, respectively). CONCLUSION: Screening a low-risk pregnant population identified the low-risk mother with a high-risk foetus, and acting on the information as described was associated with a significant reduction (35% – 43%) in stillbirths. This demonstrates a step-change reduction in stillbirths and warrants screening in SA. AOSIS 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9453129/ /pubmed/36073106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v64i1.5487 Text en © 2022. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Hlongwane, Tsakane M.
Botha, Tanita
Nkosi, Bongani S.
Pattinson, Robert C.
Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care
title Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care
title_full Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care
title_fullStr Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care
title_full_unstemmed Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care
title_short Preventing antenatal stillbirths: An innovative approach for primary health care
title_sort preventing antenatal stillbirths: an innovative approach for primary health care
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36073106
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/safp.v64i1.5487
work_keys_str_mv AT hlongwanetsakanem preventingantenatalstillbirthsaninnovativeapproachforprimaryhealthcare
AT bothatanita preventingantenatalstillbirthsaninnovativeapproachforprimaryhealthcare
AT nkosibonganis preventingantenatalstillbirthsaninnovativeapproachforprimaryhealthcare
AT pattinsonrobertc preventingantenatalstillbirthsaninnovativeapproachforprimaryhealthcare