Cargando…
Discrepancy between non-invasive prenatal testing result and fetal karyotype caused by rare confined placental mosaicism: A case report
BACKGROUND: Confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is one of the major reasons for discrepancies between the results of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and fetal karyotype analysis. CASE SUMMARY: We encountered a primiparous singleton pregnant woman with a rare CPM consisting of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY;...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157819 http://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8641 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Confined placental mosaicism (CPM) is one of the major reasons for discrepancies between the results of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and fetal karyotype analysis. CASE SUMMARY: We encountered a primiparous singleton pregnant woman with a rare CPM consisting of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY; and 46,XY, who obtained a false-positive result on NIPT with a high risk for trisomy 21. Copy-number variation sequencing on amniotic fluid cells, fetal tissue, and placental biopsies showed that the fetal karyotype was 47,XXY, while the placenta was a rare mosaic of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY; and 46,XY. CONCLUSION: The patient had a rare CPM consisting of 47,XY,+21; 47,XXY; and 46,XY, which caused a discrepancy between the result of NIPT and the actual fetal karyotype. It is important to remember that NIPT is a screening test, not a diagnostic test. Any positive result should be confirmed with invasive testing, and routine ultrasound examination is still necessary after a negative result. |
---|