Cargando…
The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review
PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in the diagnosis of meta-static lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to present a systematic review of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091653 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118914 |
_version_ | 1784785149109469184 |
---|---|
author | Gui, Benedetta Russo, Luca Minordi, Laura Miccò, Maura Persiani, Salvatore Avesani, Giacomo Rufini, Vittoria Fuoco, Valentina Autorino, Rosa Ferrandina, Gabriella Scambia, Giovanni Manfredi, Riccardo |
author_facet | Gui, Benedetta Russo, Luca Minordi, Laura Miccò, Maura Persiani, Salvatore Avesani, Giacomo Rufini, Vittoria Fuoco, Valentina Autorino, Rosa Ferrandina, Gabriella Scambia, Giovanni Manfredi, Riccardo |
author_sort | Gui, Benedetta |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in the diagnosis of meta-static lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to present a systematic review of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams of patients with LACC were retrospectively eva-luated. Mean ADC, relative ADC (rADC), and correct ADC (cADC) values of enlarged LNs were measured and compared between positron emission tomography (PET)-positive and PET-negative LNs. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Student’s t-test. ROC curves were generated for each parameter to identify the optimal cut-off value for differentiation of the LNs. A systematic search in the literature was performed, exploring several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Embase. RESULTS: A total of 105 LNs in 34 patients were analysed. The median ADC value of PET-positive LNs (0.907 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [0.780-1.080]) was lower than that in PET-negative LNs (1.275 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [1.063-1.525]) (p < 0.05). rADC and cADC values were lower in PET-positive LNs (rADC: 0.120 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [–0.060-0.270]; cADC: 1.130 [0.980-1.420]) than in PET-negative LNs (rADC: 0.435 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [0.225-0.673]; cADC: 1.615 [1.210-1.993]) LNs (p < 0.05). ADC showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.808). CONCLUSIONS: Mean ADC, rADC, and cADC were significantly lower in the PET-positive group than in the PET-negative group. The ADC cut-off value of 1.149 × 10-3 mm(2)/s showed the highest sensitivity. These results confirm the usefulness of ADC in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic LNs in LACC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9453471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94534712022-09-10 The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review Gui, Benedetta Russo, Luca Minordi, Laura Miccò, Maura Persiani, Salvatore Avesani, Giacomo Rufini, Vittoria Fuoco, Valentina Autorino, Rosa Ferrandina, Gabriella Scambia, Giovanni Manfredi, Riccardo Pol J Radiol Original Paper PURPOSE: To evaluate the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value measurement in the diagnosis of meta-static lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and to present a systematic review of the literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams of patients with LACC were retrospectively eva-luated. Mean ADC, relative ADC (rADC), and correct ADC (cADC) values of enlarged LNs were measured and compared between positron emission tomography (PET)-positive and PET-negative LNs. Comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Student’s t-test. ROC curves were generated for each parameter to identify the optimal cut-off value for differentiation of the LNs. A systematic search in the literature was performed, exploring several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Embase. RESULTS: A total of 105 LNs in 34 patients were analysed. The median ADC value of PET-positive LNs (0.907 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [0.780-1.080]) was lower than that in PET-negative LNs (1.275 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [1.063-1.525]) (p < 0.05). rADC and cADC values were lower in PET-positive LNs (rADC: 0.120 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [–0.060-0.270]; cADC: 1.130 [0.980-1.420]) than in PET-negative LNs (rADC: 0.435 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s [0.225-0.673]; cADC: 1.615 [1.210-1.993]) LNs (p < 0.05). ADC showed the highest area under the curve (AUC 0.808). CONCLUSIONS: Mean ADC, rADC, and cADC were significantly lower in the PET-positive group than in the PET-negative group. The ADC cut-off value of 1.149 × 10-3 mm(2)/s showed the highest sensitivity. These results confirm the usefulness of ADC in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic LNs in LACC. Termedia Publishing House 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9453471/ /pubmed/36091653 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118914 Text en © Pol J Radiol 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Gui, Benedetta Russo, Luca Minordi, Laura Miccò, Maura Persiani, Salvatore Avesani, Giacomo Rufini, Vittoria Fuoco, Valentina Autorino, Rosa Ferrandina, Gabriella Scambia, Giovanni Manfredi, Riccardo The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
title | The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
title_full | The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
title_fullStr | The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
title_short | The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
title_sort | role of apparent diffusion coefficient (adc) in the evaluation of lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: our experience and a review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091653 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2022.118914 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guibenedetta theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT russoluca theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT minordilaura theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT miccomaura theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT persianisalvatore theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT avesanigiacomo theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT rufinivittoria theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT fuocovalentina theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT autorinorosa theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT ferrandinagabriella theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT scambiagiovanni theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT manfrediriccardo theroleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT guibenedetta roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT russoluca roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT minordilaura roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT miccomaura roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT persianisalvatore roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT avesanigiacomo roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT rufinivittoria roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT fuocovalentina roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT autorinorosa roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT ferrandinagabriella roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT scambiagiovanni roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview AT manfrediriccardo roleofapparentdiffusioncoefficientadcintheevaluationoflymphnodestatusinpatientswithlocallyadvancedcervicalcancerourexperienceandareview |