Cargando…
Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Health utility assessments have been developed for various conditions, including chronic liver disease. Health utility scores are required for socio-economic evaluations, which can aid the distribution of national budgets. However, the standard health utility assessment scores for specif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4442 |
_version_ | 1784785211869888512 |
---|---|
author | Ishinuki, Tomohiro Ota, Shigenori Harada, Kohei Kawamoto, Masaki Meguro, Makoto Kutomi, Goro Tatsumi, Hiroomi Harada, Keisuke Miyanishi, Koji Kato, Toru Ohyanagi, Toshio Hui, Thomas T Mizuguchi, Toru |
author_facet | Ishinuki, Tomohiro Ota, Shigenori Harada, Kohei Kawamoto, Masaki Meguro, Makoto Kutomi, Goro Tatsumi, Hiroomi Harada, Keisuke Miyanishi, Koji Kato, Toru Ohyanagi, Toshio Hui, Thomas T Mizuguchi, Toru |
author_sort | Ishinuki, Tomohiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Health utility assessments have been developed for various conditions, including chronic liver disease. Health utility scores are required for socio-economic evaluations, which can aid the distribution of national budgets. However, the standard health utility assessment scores for specific health conditions are largely unknown. AIM: To summarize the health utility scores, including the EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol-visual analogue scale, short from-36 (SF-36), RAND-36, and Health Utilities Index (HUI)-Mark2/Mark3 scores, for the normal population and chronic liver disease patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE, including the Cochrane Library, was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software. Multiple means and standard deviations were combined using the StatsToDo online web program. RESULTS: The EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 can be used for health utility evaluations during antiviral therapy for hepatitis C. HUI-Mark2/Mark3 indicated that the health utility scores of hepatitis B patients are roughly 30% better than those of hepatitis C patients. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D-5L is the most popular questionnaire for health utility assessments. Health assessments that allow free registration would be useful for evaluating health utility in patients with liver disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9453766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94537662022-09-23 Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis Ishinuki, Tomohiro Ota, Shigenori Harada, Kohei Kawamoto, Masaki Meguro, Makoto Kutomi, Goro Tatsumi, Hiroomi Harada, Keisuke Miyanishi, Koji Kato, Toru Ohyanagi, Toshio Hui, Thomas T Mizuguchi, Toru World J Gastroenterol Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Health utility assessments have been developed for various conditions, including chronic liver disease. Health utility scores are required for socio-economic evaluations, which can aid the distribution of national budgets. However, the standard health utility assessment scores for specific health conditions are largely unknown. AIM: To summarize the health utility scores, including the EuroQOL 5-dimensions 5-levels (EQ-5D-5L), EuroQol-visual analogue scale, short from-36 (SF-36), RAND-36, and Health Utilities Index (HUI)-Mark2/Mark3 scores, for the normal population and chronic liver disease patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE, including the Cochrane Library, was performed. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software. Multiple means and standard deviations were combined using the StatsToDo online web program. RESULTS: The EQ-5D-5L and SF-36 can be used for health utility evaluations during antiviral therapy for hepatitis C. HUI-Mark2/Mark3 indicated that the health utility scores of hepatitis B patients are roughly 30% better than those of hepatitis C patients. CONCLUSION: The EQ-5D-5L is the most popular questionnaire for health utility assessments. Health assessments that allow free registration would be useful for evaluating health utility in patients with liver disease. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-08-21 2022-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9453766/ /pubmed/36159009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4442 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Meta-Analysis Ishinuki, Tomohiro Ota, Shigenori Harada, Kohei Kawamoto, Masaki Meguro, Makoto Kutomi, Goro Tatsumi, Hiroomi Harada, Keisuke Miyanishi, Koji Kato, Toru Ohyanagi, Toshio Hui, Thomas T Mizuguchi, Toru Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis |
title | Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis |
title_full | Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis |
title_short | Current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: A meta-analysis |
title_sort | current standard values of health utility scores for evaluating cost-effectiveness in liver disease: a meta-analysis |
topic | Meta-Analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9453766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36159009 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i31.4442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ishinukitomohiro currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT otashigenori currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT haradakohei currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT kawamotomasaki currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT meguromakoto currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT kutomigoro currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT tatsumihiroomi currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT haradakeisuke currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT miyanishikoji currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT katotoru currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT ohyanagitoshio currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT huithomast currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis AT mizuguchitoru currentstandardvaluesofhealthutilityscoresforevaluatingcosteffectivenessinliverdiseaseametaanalysis |