Cargando…

Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes

SIMPLE SUMMARY: This observational study on 407 patients experiencing biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) reveals that 33% of men were managed with active observation without risk of prostate-related death (0%), at an average of 7.5 years follow-up. These findings suppo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Erica, Huynh, Linda My, Tran, Joshua, Gordon, Adam M., Chandhoke, Ryan, Morales, Blanca, Skarecky, Douglas, Ahlering, Thomas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174078
_version_ 1784785398711451648
author Huang, Erica
Huynh, Linda My
Tran, Joshua
Gordon, Adam M.
Chandhoke, Ryan
Morales, Blanca
Skarecky, Douglas
Ahlering, Thomas E.
author_facet Huang, Erica
Huynh, Linda My
Tran, Joshua
Gordon, Adam M.
Chandhoke, Ryan
Morales, Blanca
Skarecky, Douglas
Ahlering, Thomas E.
author_sort Huang, Erica
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: This observational study on 407 patients experiencing biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) reveals that 33% of men were managed with active observation without risk of prostate-related death (0%), at an average of 7.5 years follow-up. These findings support that a significant portion of men following RP develop a benign recurrence that does not require treatment intervention. ABSTRACT: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is an unreliable predictor of prostate cancer (PC) progression. This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data (407/1895) of men with BCR at a tertiary referral center. Patients were assessed for active observation (AO) compared with a treatment group (TG) utilizing doubling time (DT) kinetics. Risk assessment was based on the initial DT (>12 vs. <12 months), then based on the DT pattern (changed over time). Those with unstable, rapidly decreasing DTs received treatment. Those with increasing and slowly decreasing DTs prompted observation. The primary outcome was PC mortality, safety, and efficacy of observations based on DT kinetics. The secondary outcome was BCR patients managed with or without treatment. The median follow-up was 7.5 years (IQR 3.9–10.7). The PCSM in TG and AO was 10.7% and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). The initial DT was >12 months in 73.6% of AO versus 22.6% of TG (p < 0.001). An increasing DT pattern was observed in 71.5% of AO versus 32.7% of TG (p < 0.001). Utilizing the Cleveland Clinic’s PCSM nomogram, at 10 years, predicted and observed PCSM was 8.6% and 9.5% (p = 0.78), respectively. In conclusion, one-third of patients with BCR post-RP were managed without treatment using DT kinetics, avoiding treatment-related complications, quality-of-life issues, and expenses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9454648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94546482022-09-09 Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes Huang, Erica Huynh, Linda My Tran, Joshua Gordon, Adam M. Chandhoke, Ryan Morales, Blanca Skarecky, Douglas Ahlering, Thomas E. Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: This observational study on 407 patients experiencing biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) reveals that 33% of men were managed with active observation without risk of prostate-related death (0%), at an average of 7.5 years follow-up. These findings support that a significant portion of men following RP develop a benign recurrence that does not require treatment intervention. ABSTRACT: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is an unreliable predictor of prostate cancer (PC) progression. This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data (407/1895) of men with BCR at a tertiary referral center. Patients were assessed for active observation (AO) compared with a treatment group (TG) utilizing doubling time (DT) kinetics. Risk assessment was based on the initial DT (>12 vs. <12 months), then based on the DT pattern (changed over time). Those with unstable, rapidly decreasing DTs received treatment. Those with increasing and slowly decreasing DTs prompted observation. The primary outcome was PC mortality, safety, and efficacy of observations based on DT kinetics. The secondary outcome was BCR patients managed with or without treatment. The median follow-up was 7.5 years (IQR 3.9–10.7). The PCSM in TG and AO was 10.7% and 0%, respectively (p < 0.001). The initial DT was >12 months in 73.6% of AO versus 22.6% of TG (p < 0.001). An increasing DT pattern was observed in 71.5% of AO versus 32.7% of TG (p < 0.001). Utilizing the Cleveland Clinic’s PCSM nomogram, at 10 years, predicted and observed PCSM was 8.6% and 9.5% (p = 0.78), respectively. In conclusion, one-third of patients with BCR post-RP were managed without treatment using DT kinetics, avoiding treatment-related complications, quality-of-life issues, and expenses. MDPI 2022-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9454648/ /pubmed/36077615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174078 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Erica
Huynh, Linda My
Tran, Joshua
Gordon, Adam M.
Chandhoke, Ryan
Morales, Blanca
Skarecky, Douglas
Ahlering, Thomas E.
Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes
title Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes
title_full Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes
title_fullStr Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes
title_short Active Observation of Biochemical Recurrence without Treatment following Radical Prostatectomy: Long-Term Analysis of Outcomes
title_sort active observation of biochemical recurrence without treatment following radical prostatectomy: long-term analysis of outcomes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077615
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174078
work_keys_str_mv AT huangerica activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT huynhlindamy activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT tranjoshua activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT gordonadamm activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT chandhokeryan activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT moralesblanca activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT skareckydouglas activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes
AT ahleringthomase activeobservationofbiochemicalrecurrencewithouttreatmentfollowingradicalprostatectomylongtermanalysisofoutcomes