Cargando…

Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice

How many RBPMS(+) retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) does a standard C57BL/6 laboratory mouse have on average and is this number substrain- or sex-dependent? Do RGCs of (European) C57BL/6J and -N mice show a different intrinsic vulnerability upon glaucomatous injury? Global RGC numbers and densities of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Claes, Marie, Moons, Lieve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172689
_version_ 1784785412249616384
author Claes, Marie
Moons, Lieve
author_facet Claes, Marie
Moons, Lieve
author_sort Claes, Marie
collection PubMed
description How many RBPMS(+) retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) does a standard C57BL/6 laboratory mouse have on average and is this number substrain- or sex-dependent? Do RGCs of (European) C57BL/6J and -N mice show a different intrinsic vulnerability upon glaucomatous injury? Global RGC numbers and densities of common laboratory mice were previously determined via axon counts, retrograde tracing or BRN3A immunohistochemistry. Here, we report the global RGC number and density by exploiting the freely available tool RGCode to automatically count RGC numbers and densities on entire retinal wholemounts immunostained for the pan-RGC marker RBPMS. The intrinsic vulnerability of RGCs from different substrains to glaucomatous injury was evaluated upon introduction of the microbead occlusion model, followed by RBPMS counts, retrograde tracing and electroretinography five weeks post-injury. We demonstrate that the global RGC number and density varies between substrains, yet is not sex-dependent. C57BL/6J mice have on average 46K ± 2K RBPMS(+) RGCs per retina, representing a global RGC density of 3268 ± 177 RGCs/mm(2). C57BL/6N mice, on the other hand, have on average less RBPMS(+) RGCs (41K ± 3K RGCs) and a lower density (3018 ± 189 RGCs/mm(2)). The vulnerability of the RGC population of the two C57BL/6 substrains to glaucomatous injury did, however, not differ in any of the interrogated parameters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9454702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94547022022-09-09 Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice Claes, Marie Moons, Lieve Cells Communication How many RBPMS(+) retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) does a standard C57BL/6 laboratory mouse have on average and is this number substrain- or sex-dependent? Do RGCs of (European) C57BL/6J and -N mice show a different intrinsic vulnerability upon glaucomatous injury? Global RGC numbers and densities of common laboratory mice were previously determined via axon counts, retrograde tracing or BRN3A immunohistochemistry. Here, we report the global RGC number and density by exploiting the freely available tool RGCode to automatically count RGC numbers and densities on entire retinal wholemounts immunostained for the pan-RGC marker RBPMS. The intrinsic vulnerability of RGCs from different substrains to glaucomatous injury was evaluated upon introduction of the microbead occlusion model, followed by RBPMS counts, retrograde tracing and electroretinography five weeks post-injury. We demonstrate that the global RGC number and density varies between substrains, yet is not sex-dependent. C57BL/6J mice have on average 46K ± 2K RBPMS(+) RGCs per retina, representing a global RGC density of 3268 ± 177 RGCs/mm(2). C57BL/6N mice, on the other hand, have on average less RBPMS(+) RGCs (41K ± 3K RGCs) and a lower density (3018 ± 189 RGCs/mm(2)). The vulnerability of the RGC population of the two C57BL/6 substrains to glaucomatous injury did, however, not differ in any of the interrogated parameters. MDPI 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9454702/ /pubmed/36078097 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172689 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Claes, Marie
Moons, Lieve
Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice
title Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice
title_full Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice
title_fullStr Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice
title_full_unstemmed Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice
title_short Retinal Ganglion Cells: Global Number, Density and Vulnerability to Glaucomatous Injury in Common Laboratory Mice
title_sort retinal ganglion cells: global number, density and vulnerability to glaucomatous injury in common laboratory mice
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078097
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172689
work_keys_str_mv AT claesmarie retinalganglioncellsglobalnumberdensityandvulnerabilitytoglaucomatousinjuryincommonlaboratorymice
AT moonslieve retinalganglioncellsglobalnumberdensityandvulnerabilitytoglaucomatousinjuryincommonlaboratorymice