Cargando…

Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy is concerning but does not accurately predict cancer progression or death. In our patients with a biochemical recurrence, we explore whether PSA doubling time kinetics can safely guide avoidance of treatment, preventing unwanted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Erica, Tran, Joshua, Huynh, Linda My, Skarecky, Douglas, Wilson, Robert H., Ahlering, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174087
_version_ 1784785415298875392
author Huang, Erica
Tran, Joshua
Huynh, Linda My
Skarecky, Douglas
Wilson, Robert H.
Ahlering, Thomas
author_facet Huang, Erica
Tran, Joshua
Huynh, Linda My
Skarecky, Douglas
Wilson, Robert H.
Ahlering, Thomas
author_sort Huang, Erica
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy is concerning but does not accurately predict cancer progression or death. In our patients with a biochemical recurrence, we explore whether PSA doubling time kinetics can safely guide avoidance of treatment, preventing unwanted side effects and costs. In our study, initial PSADT and subsequent DT patterns were the only predictors of no need for treatment. Gleason grade group, pathological stage, preoperative PSA, and age were not significant predictors of treatment. Approximately one-third of BCRs observed in this cohort following RP were determined to be low-risk and able to be safely followed without treatment using PSADT kinetics, with a 100% cancer-specific survival after 7.6 years of follow-up. ABSTRACT: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) has a limited ability to predict prostate cancer (PC) progression, leading to overtreatment, decreased quality of life, and additional expenses. Previously, we established that one-third of men with BCR in our group experienced low-risk recurrences that were safely observed without treatment. Our retrospective cohort analysis of 407 BCR patients post RP validates the use of PSA doubling time (DT) kinetics to direct active observation (AO) versus treatment following RP. The primary outcome was no need for treatment according to the predictive value of models of ROC analysis. The secondary outcome was PC-specific mortality (PCSM) according to Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 1864 men underwent RP (June 2002–September 2019); 407 experienced BCR (PSA > 0.2 ng/dL, ×2), with a median follow-up of 7.6 years. In adjusted regression analysis, initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT were significant predictors for AO (p < 0.001). This model (initial PSADT and DT change) was an excellent predictor of AO in ROC analysis (AUC = 0.83). No patients with initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT experienced PCSM. In conclusion, the combination of PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT was an excellent predictor of AO. This is the first demonstration that one-third of BCRs are at low risk of PCSM and can be managed without treatment via DT kinetics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9454714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94547142022-09-09 Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences Huang, Erica Tran, Joshua Huynh, Linda My Skarecky, Douglas Wilson, Robert H. Ahlering, Thomas Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy is concerning but does not accurately predict cancer progression or death. In our patients with a biochemical recurrence, we explore whether PSA doubling time kinetics can safely guide avoidance of treatment, preventing unwanted side effects and costs. In our study, initial PSADT and subsequent DT patterns were the only predictors of no need for treatment. Gleason grade group, pathological stage, preoperative PSA, and age were not significant predictors of treatment. Approximately one-third of BCRs observed in this cohort following RP were determined to be low-risk and able to be safely followed without treatment using PSADT kinetics, with a 100% cancer-specific survival after 7.6 years of follow-up. ABSTRACT: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP) has a limited ability to predict prostate cancer (PC) progression, leading to overtreatment, decreased quality of life, and additional expenses. Previously, we established that one-third of men with BCR in our group experienced low-risk recurrences that were safely observed without treatment. Our retrospective cohort analysis of 407 BCR patients post RP validates the use of PSA doubling time (DT) kinetics to direct active observation (AO) versus treatment following RP. The primary outcome was no need for treatment according to the predictive value of models of ROC analysis. The secondary outcome was PC-specific mortality (PCSM) according to Kaplan–Meier analysis. A total of 1864 men underwent RP (June 2002–September 2019); 407 experienced BCR (PSA > 0.2 ng/dL, ×2), with a median follow-up of 7.6 years. In adjusted regression analysis, initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT were significant predictors for AO (p < 0.001). This model (initial PSADT and DT change) was an excellent predictor of AO in ROC analysis (AUC = 0.83). No patients with initial PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT experienced PCSM. In conclusion, the combination of PSADT > 12 months and increasing DT was an excellent predictor of AO. This is the first demonstration that one-third of BCRs are at low risk of PCSM and can be managed without treatment via DT kinetics. MDPI 2022-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9454714/ /pubmed/36077624 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174087 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Huang, Erica
Tran, Joshua
Huynh, Linda My
Skarecky, Douglas
Wilson, Robert H.
Ahlering, Thomas
Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences
title Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences
title_full Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences
title_fullStr Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences
title_full_unstemmed Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences
title_short Prostate-Specific Antigen Doubling Time Kinetics following Radical Prostatectomy to Guide Need for Treatment Intervention: Validation of Low-Risk Recurrences
title_sort prostate-specific antigen doubling time kinetics following radical prostatectomy to guide need for treatment intervention: validation of low-risk recurrences
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077624
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174087
work_keys_str_mv AT huangerica prostatespecificantigendoublingtimekineticsfollowingradicalprostatectomytoguideneedfortreatmentinterventionvalidationoflowriskrecurrences
AT tranjoshua prostatespecificantigendoublingtimekineticsfollowingradicalprostatectomytoguideneedfortreatmentinterventionvalidationoflowriskrecurrences
AT huynhlindamy prostatespecificantigendoublingtimekineticsfollowingradicalprostatectomytoguideneedfortreatmentinterventionvalidationoflowriskrecurrences
AT skareckydouglas prostatespecificantigendoublingtimekineticsfollowingradicalprostatectomytoguideneedfortreatmentinterventionvalidationoflowriskrecurrences
AT wilsonroberth prostatespecificantigendoublingtimekineticsfollowingradicalprostatectomytoguideneedfortreatmentinterventionvalidationoflowriskrecurrences
AT ahleringthomas prostatespecificantigendoublingtimekineticsfollowingradicalprostatectomytoguideneedfortreatmentinterventionvalidationoflowriskrecurrences